Now that Musk owns Twitter

[Dog 2.0]

I am not bothered because when I Google the info you assert, the results come up without any mainstream sourcing. So naturally, you are entitled to believe whatever you want but don't expect people to flock to agree with wrong conclusions.

Bullshit ... Try the NYT, WAPO, CBS or CNN

 

[Dog 2.0]

And yet there is no actual, factual evidence of this. It's amazing what masterminds those Democrats are!

Yes there is.

 

[Steam Flyer]

And yet there is no actual, factual evidence of this. ...

Yes there is.

So, it should be easy to cite then. Convincing, easy to prove, difficult to refute...

Instead your Bullshit Brigade has been thrown out of court and had legal penalties countless times, for bringing "no evidence" to the case. When will you face fact? Never, I'm guessing.

 

[Dog 2.0]

So, it should be easy to cite then. Convincing, easy to prove, difficult to refute...

Have done many times.

 

[Bus Driver]

So, it should be easy to cite then. Convincing, easy to prove, difficult to refute...

Instead your Bullshit Brigade has been thrown out of court and had legal penalties countless times, for bringing "no evidence" to the case. When will you face fact? Never, I'm guessing.

Maybe there IS evidence, but they don't want to share it. Did you ever think about that?

 

[phillysailor]

Trump’s Own Appointees Reportedly Opened Criminal Investigation Into Him As Part Of Durham Russia Probe​

Take your complaints to Durham. When Durham and Barr started talking about the special investigation leading to possible criminal charges, this was why.

Poor doggy

Yes you did ... post 3541

I was just relaying what Durham & Barr had to investigate after they investigated your cockamamie conspiracy theory.

Sorry you don’t like the direction their probe had to take. Take it up with them.

Try as you might, this ain’t about me or liberals. This is Trumps defenders having to investigate Trump for financial crimes. They covered it up, whatever it was, and so we only know they had to investigate. So glad you don’t find any of this concerning.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I was just relaying what Durham & Barr had to investigate after they investigated your cockamamie conspiracy theory.

Sorry you don’t like the direction their probe had to take. Take it up with them.

Try as you might, this ain’t about me or liberals. This is Trumps defenders having to investigate Trump for financial crimes. They covered it up, whatever it was, and so we only know they had to investigate. So glad you don’t find any of this concerning.

So back to my question ... what were the financial crimes you contend were revealed?

 

[Steam Flyer]

So back to my question ... what were the financial crimes you contend were revealed?

Bank fraud, to the tune of billions, tax fraud on those billions. Blatant and ongoing, amazing it hasn't been prosecuted before.

Makes you wonder how much else is going on, there are many people richer than Trump.

So, it should be easy to cite then. Convincing, easy to prove, difficult to refute...

Have done many times.

You mean, like all the court cases that got dismissed for lack of evidence? All the lawyers facing sanction/disbarment by trying to bullshit?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Maybe there IS evidence, but they don't want to share it. Did you ever think about that?

Maybe there is evidence ... Jesus. In the Clinesmith example there has been a conviction and you still will not believe it.

 

[phillysailor]

So back to my question ... what were the financial crimes you contend were revealed?

I contend nothing of the sort, my reading impaired friend.

I’m saying allies of Trump investigated your dumbass theory, and ended up pursuing Trump for financial crimes but didn’t tell the public about why.

They just announced the Durham Investigation had turned into a criminal investigation.

Did you understand this time?

 

[Steam Flyer]

Maybe there is evidence ... Jesus. In the Clinesmith example there has been a conviction and you still will not believe it.

Oooo stand back, 1 conviction... is that related to Mark Meadows, -and- his wife? DeSantis punishing the ex-cons that his elections board told were OK then suddenly weren't? Kobach's Federal commission on voter fraud, which was disbanded because they were embarrassing even Trump?

Meanwhile, leading the charge for bullshitting about voter fraud, The Heritage Foundation claims 1200+ convictions but they tend to skimp on details....

Oddly enough, what appear on the web site to be links to further detaisl, are not.

 

[Bus Driver]

Oooo stand back, 1 conviction... is that related to Mark Meadows, -and- his wife? DeSantis punishing the ex-cons that his elections board told were OK then suddenly weren't? Kobach's Federal commission on voter fraud, which was disbanded because they were embarrassing even Trump?

Meanwhile, leading the charge for bullshitting about voter fraud, The Heritage Foundation claims 1200+ convictions but they tend to skimp on details....

View attachment 572956

Oddly enough, what appear on the web site to be links to further detaisl, are not.

Easy, now. Dog's got himself a bone. Don't try to wrest it away. Mad dogs are dangerous.

Never mind the scores of lawsuits filed on behalf of the defeated ex-President, alleging the election was fraudulent/stolen, only to be dismissed for lack of (actually "absence of") evidence.

 

[Grrr...]

Maybe there is evidence ... Jesus. In the Clinesmith example there has been a conviction and you still will not believe it.

Clinesmith admitted in Washington, D.C. federal court in August 2020 that he altered an email that was included in information presented in 2017 to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court concerning whether or not then-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had been a "source" for the CIA. Clinesmith said he believed he was conveying accurate information to the court and had no intent to deceive it.

And yet in the last two presidential elections the meddling has been on behalf of the Democratic candidate.

Could you please give us some evidence of this meddling on the part of democratic candidates?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Clinesmith admitted in Washington, D.C. federal court in August 2020 that he altered an email that was included in information presented in 2017 to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court concerning whether or not then-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page had been a "source" for the CIA. Clinesmith said he believed he was conveying accurate information to the court and had no intent to deceive it.



Could you please give us some evidence of this meddling on the part of democratic candidates?

Right ... he changed the email from reading that Carter Page had worked for the FBI to read that he had not worked for the FBI. Don't you get tired of being led around by the nose.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I contend nothing of the sort, my reading impaired friend.

Yes you did.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Easy, now. Dog's got himself a bone. Don't try to wrest it away. Mad dogs are dangerous.

Never mind the scores of lawsuits filed on behalf of the defeated ex-President, alleging the election was fraudulent/stolen, only to be dismissed for lack of (actually "absence of") evidence.

That's an interesting topic too.

 

[Dog 2.0]

That's an interesting topic too. Are you raising it to avoid this one?

 

[phillysailor]

Yes you did.

Because you say so? No. Truth doesn’t work that way.

I wrote that investigations into a fake conspiracy you endorse turned into Barr and Durham investigating Trump for financial crimes. And I supported it with a story based on the NYT exposé on the perfectly-awful-in-every-way Durham shitshow.

You’re a lying shit.

 

[Bus Driver]

That's an interesting topic too.

I tried responding to your self-reply (Post #3,578), in which you added a question.

The field appeared blank. So....

We were discussing evidence, and the lack thereof, that support the many, many allegations from your elk of fraud and stolen elections, and whatever. I was simply pointing out the habit of folks on your team to level allegations and fail/refuse to provide evidence to back it up.

Put down my answer to your question as being "No. I am citing repeated behaviors."

Do try and keep up.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I tried responding to your self-reply (Post #3,578), in which you added a question.

The field appeared blank. So....

We were discussing evidence, and the lack thereof, that support the many, many allegations from your elk of fraud and stolen elections, and whatever. I was simply pointing out the habit of folks on your team to level allegations and fail/refuse to provide evidence to back it up.

Put down my answer to your question as being "No. I am citing repeated behaviors."

Do try and keep up.

Do you believe the FBI planted a false story about the Hunter Biden laptop being "Russian disinformation" in the days before the 2020 election?