Now that Musk owns Twitter

[Bus Driver]

3583

Typing out I believe dozens of intel professionals is what I did.

They say it is "Russian disinformation", but you know better. They are willing to stake their reputations on a position. You prefer to take the word of others.

From the article I cited -

The New York Times raised questions on Sunday about the rigor of the Post’s reporting process, revealing that several of its reporters had refused to put their name on the Biden stories because they were concerned about the authenticity of the materials. The Post stood by its reporting, saying it was vetted before publication.

Now, what is it that you keep saying about "unnamed sources"?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Typing out I believe dozens of intel professionals is what I did.

They say it is "Russian disinformation", but you know better. They are willing to stake their reputations on a position. You prefer to take the word of others.

From the article I cited -

The New York Times raised questions on Sunday about the rigor of the Post’s reporting process, revealing that several of its reporters had refused to put their name on the Biden stories because they were concerned about the authenticity of the materials. The Post stood by its reporting, saying it was vetted before publication.

Now, what is it that you keep saying about "unnamed sources"?

You still believe the hoax ... Amazing.

 

[Bus Driver]

You still believe the hoax ... Amazing.

I believe that YOU believe it is a hoax. Dozens of intel experts disagree with you.

Who to believe?

 

[another 505 sailor]

I believe that YOU believe it is a hoax. Dozens of intel experts disagree with you.

Who to believe?

The architect that draws ADA compliant restrooms.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I believe that YOU believe it is a hoax. Dozens of intel experts disagree with you.

Who to believe?

But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.

 

[Grrr...]

But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.

What is it that you are claiming those newspapers "believe"?

 

[phillysailor]

But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership?

 

[Ishmael]

Don't feed the troll.

 

[Bus Driver]

But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.

If you took a laptop in for a repair and your personal data was copied, tampered with, and distributed, what would YOU do?

 

[Dog 2.0]

If you took a laptop in for a repair and your personal data was copied, tampered with, and distributed, what would YOU do?

I would probably threaten legal action which would be tantamount to an admission that the laptop was mine.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership?

That's an open question. Mr. Isaac contends that since the laptop was not collected in the time dictated by the contract, it became his.

 

[phillysailor]

That's an open question. Mr. Isaac contends that since the laptop was not collected in the time dictated by the contract, it became his.

That’s not my question.

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership of the laptop?

I’d love to see you justify the argument that if an individual’s personal data appears on an electronic storage device, they own that device.

I’ll wait 🍿

 

[Bus Driver]

That's an open question. Mr. Isaac contends that since the laptop was not collected in the time dictated by the contract, it became his.

Even if the laptop did become his, did the personal data become his? Hell, that could be access to financial accounts.

 

[phillysailor]

Hello? Paging @Dog 2.0

Does personal data on a computer or other storage device indicate ownership?

 

[Dog 2.0]

That’s not my question.

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership of the laptop?

I’d love to see you justify the argument that if an individual’s personal data appears on an electronic storage device, they own that device.

I’ll wait 🍿

Of course not, in this case Hunter's personal information is on a computer that now belongs to Mr. Isaacs.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Even if the laptop did become his, did the personal data become his? Hell, that could be access to financial accounts.

That's the open question.

 

[phillysailor]

Of course not, in this case Hunter's personal information is on a computer that now belongs to Mr. Isaacs.

Glad to see you agree that just because Hunters personal data was on a computer doesn’t mean all the data on the laptop was his, nor that the laptop was ever his property.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Glad to see you agree that just because Hunters personal data was on a computer doesn’t mean all the data on the laptop was his, nor that the laptop was ever his property.

But the laptop was his property.

 

[phillysailor]

But the laptop was his property.

So a guy says. YOU don’t know more than that.

 

[Bus Driver]

So a guy says. YOU don’t know more than that.

He "knows" what Musk wants him to "know".

Requires faith.