Now that Musk owns Twitter

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
Typing out I believe dozens of intel professionals is what I did.

They say it is "Russian disinformation", but you know better. They are willing to stake their reputations on a position. You prefer to take the word of others.

From the article I cited -

The New York Times raised questions on Sunday about the rigor of the Post’s reporting process, revealing that several of its reporters had refused to put their name on the Biden stories because they were concerned about the authenticity of the materials. The Post stood by its reporting, saying it was vetted before publication.

Now, what is it that you keep saying about "unnamed sources"?
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,995
604
Typing out I believe dozens of intel professionals is what I did.

They say it is "Russian disinformation", but you know better. They are willing to stake their reputations on a position. You prefer to take the word of others.

From the article I cited -

The New York Times raised questions on Sunday about the rigor of the Post’s reporting process, revealing that several of its reporters had refused to put their name on the Biden stories because they were concerned about the authenticity of the materials. The Post stood by its reporting, saying it was vetted before publication.

Now, what is it that you keep saying about "unnamed sources"?
You still believe the hoax ... Amazing.
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,995
604
I believe that YOU believe it is a hoax. Dozens of intel experts disagree with you.

Who to believe?
But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.
 

Grrr...

▰▰▰▰▰▰▰▰▰▰ 100%
10,444
2,800
Detroit
But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.
What is it that you are claiming those newspapers "believe"?
 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
9,312
4,085
But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.
Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership?
 

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
But do they really? Even if they did in October 2020 (doubtful) do they still believe it. The NYT, WAPO, CBS, NBC, NYP, CNN, Politico all don't. And now Hunter is threatening legal action against those trafficking his data. He denies that's amounts to an admission that the laptop is legit, but it is.
If you took a laptop in for a repair and your personal data was copied, tampered with, and distributed, what would YOU do?
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,995
604
If you took a laptop in for a repair and your personal data was copied, tampered with, and distributed, what would YOU do?
I would probably threaten legal action which would be tantamount to an admission that the laptop was mine.
 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
9,312
4,085
That's an open question. Mr. Isaac contends that since the laptop was not collected in the time dictated by the contract, it became his.
That’s not my question.

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership of the laptop?

I’d love to see you justify the argument that if an individual’s personal data appears on an electronic storage device, they own that device.

I’ll wait 🍿
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,995
604
That’s not my question.

Does the presence of personal information on a laptop determine ownership of the laptop?

I’d love to see you justify the argument that if an individual’s personal data appears on an electronic storage device, they own that device.

I’ll wait 🍿
Of course not, in this case Hunter's personal information is on a computer that now belongs to Mr. Isaacs.
 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
9,312
4,085
Of course not, in this case Hunter's personal information is on a computer that now belongs to Mr. Isaacs.
Glad to see you agree that just because Hunters personal data was on a computer doesn’t mean all the data on the laptop was his, nor that the laptop was ever his property.
 
Top