Dog 2.0
Super Anarchist
- 4,068
- 614
I have a problem with RWNJ'S like you trying to frame this as a free speech issue. Free speech has nothing to do with private companies censoring content.
I have a problem with RWNJ'S like you trying to frame this as a free speech issue. Free speech has nothing to do with private companies censoring content.
They are moochers. Trump at least attempted his own platform but of course that was a big flop.I have a problem with RWNJ'S like you trying to frame this as a free speech issue. Free speech has nothing to do with private companies censoring content.
That a private company can censor free speech does not mean that private companies censoring free speech is not a free speech issue.I have a problem with RWNJ'S like you trying to frame this as a free speech issue. Free speech has nothing to do with private companies censoring content.
If free speech at a private company is not an issue, why all the bed wetting over Musk buying Twitter.
That bed-wetting is nothing compared to the bed-wetting you've been displaying, of late.If free speech at a private company is not an issue, why all the bed wetting over Musk buying Twitter.
Hate speech is the issue.If free speech at a private company is not an issue, why all the bed wetting over Musk buying Twitter.
Please, the left is in a meltdown over Musk buying Twitter and the prosect that Twitter will not be censoring free speech in the way it has been.The only person wetting their bed about this would be you.
You have found the bed wetter and it is you.
Please, the left is in a meltdown over Musk buying Twitter and the prosect that Twitter will not be censoring free speech in the way it has been.
Please, the left is in a meltdown over Musk buying Twitter...
Please, the left is in a meltdown over Musk buying Twitter and the prosect that Twitter will not be censoring free speech in the way it has been.
Sounds like you agree that how companies handle free speech is a legitimate issue.Some people were troubled at the prospect of so much unmoderated hate speech and misinformation.
But now progressives are realizing that it is good for the long game. You guys will spread misinformation about voting and stop each other from voting. You guys will spread misinformation about health and vaccines and kill yourselves off. You guys will give a platform to Holocaust deniers, fascists and racists, and generally show who you really are.
This is exactly why I stopped arguing with Trumpers about the vaccine. "If he lives, he lives, if he dies, he dies". Shrug. Let Darwin sort them out.Some people were troubled at the prospect of so much unmoderated hate speech and misinformation.
But now progressives are realizing that it is good for the long game. You guys will spread misinformation about voting and stop each other from voting. You guys will spread misinformation about health and vaccines and kill yourselves off. You guys will give a platform to Holocaust deniers, fascists and racists, and generally show who you really are.
Couldn't be those bots Musk once cited as a justification for trying to back out of the deal, could it?In related news...
![]()
Republicans are Gaining Twitter Followers All of a Sudden — And It’s Not Exactly Clear Why - The Stream
Republican politicians have gained Twitter followers in the hundreds of thousands while Democrats saw plummeting followers after billionaire and Tesla founder Elon Musk took over the social media platform, according to The Washington Post.stream.org
Companies do not handle free speechSounds like you agree that how companies handle free speech is a legitimate issue.