tane
Anarchist
- 951
- 274
reduction of caloric intake (past a certain amount) is one way to guarantee weight gain - & a lot of literature, studies, anecdotal evidence (& plain logic) backs this up.
The moment your body sees a reduction in food it is going to hang on to it's reserves tenaciously while cutting down on expended calories = slowing down metabolism.
(Now this does NOT mean one should continue couching & stuffing oneself with chips if one is overweight!)
BUT: looking at thin people (& myself) I clearly see: a high degree of physical activity PLUS a lot of ("healthy"!!!) food has not made us fat. The idea is to stoke metabolism up as much as possible (a,...yes: one has to like, really LIKE, physical activity! & by "physical activity" I do NOT mean "walkies" after dinner, but going to your very limits - where it hurts! - at least once a day!
example: in my lose group of mountainbike friends the thinnest, very powerful, guy (body fat must be somewhere 6-7%) always has to eat a sweet snack after 45min or so of ride & sure is not following a regime of restricted caloric intake. He is >50 years.
I, at 66, am not quite that skinny, but I sure eat as much as I want (even though people call my "diet" of bread, dairy products, fruit & a tuna-tin-a-week peculiar...+ coffe & cake) sweets included & at nearly 6' & 149lbs am generally called "skinny"
"Dieting" is one of the sure-fire ways to gain weight!
THE problem that I see: if physical activity (not "walkies"!) is abhorred - usually one is on a "slippery slope" towards overweight. As one ages metabolism is slowing down by itself without any further "help" by reduced physical activity, & caloric intake reduction further slows it down.
Caveat:
Now while I enjoy strenuous mountainbiking every other day & weigh-lifting on the days in between:
the possible "gain" in lifetime (which I will yet have to see...) most certainly will be much less than the time spent exercising. I actually enjoy my "regime" very much, but the "time balance" for somebody exercising only for the gain in life-expectancy will be negative! If I die today I will still be on the positive side, because I enjoyed my sports, but if somebody would do it despite hating it....the gain in lifetime will be much less than the time expended doing the hated sports.
There is one aspect though: "quality of life" is much higher when one is "fit"...
The moment your body sees a reduction in food it is going to hang on to it's reserves tenaciously while cutting down on expended calories = slowing down metabolism.
(Now this does NOT mean one should continue couching & stuffing oneself with chips if one is overweight!)
BUT: looking at thin people (& myself) I clearly see: a high degree of physical activity PLUS a lot of ("healthy"!!!) food has not made us fat. The idea is to stoke metabolism up as much as possible (a,...yes: one has to like, really LIKE, physical activity! & by "physical activity" I do NOT mean "walkies" after dinner, but going to your very limits - where it hurts! - at least once a day!
example: in my lose group of mountainbike friends the thinnest, very powerful, guy (body fat must be somewhere 6-7%) always has to eat a sweet snack after 45min or so of ride & sure is not following a regime of restricted caloric intake. He is >50 years.
I, at 66, am not quite that skinny, but I sure eat as much as I want (even though people call my "diet" of bread, dairy products, fruit & a tuna-tin-a-week peculiar...+ coffe & cake) sweets included & at nearly 6' & 149lbs am generally called "skinny"
"Dieting" is one of the sure-fire ways to gain weight!
THE problem that I see: if physical activity (not "walkies"!) is abhorred - usually one is on a "slippery slope" towards overweight. As one ages metabolism is slowing down by itself without any further "help" by reduced physical activity, & caloric intake reduction further slows it down.
Caveat:
Now while I enjoy strenuous mountainbiking every other day & weigh-lifting on the days in between:
the possible "gain" in lifetime (which I will yet have to see...) most certainly will be much less than the time spent exercising. I actually enjoy my "regime" very much, but the "time balance" for somebody exercising only for the gain in life-expectancy will be negative! If I die today I will still be on the positive side, because I enjoyed my sports, but if somebody would do it despite hating it....the gain in lifetime will be much less than the time expended doing the hated sports.
There is one aspect though: "quality of life" is much higher when one is "fit"...