Olson 30 vs New Modern 30' Boats

Not for nothing

Super Anarchist
3,884
975
jupiter

2013 Pogo Pogo 3030ft​

(US$153,075)

30' Olson 30​



Year​
Length​
Beam​
Draft​
Location​
Price​
1979
30'
9'6'
6'
Oregon
$9,000
I'll stick with the Olson
 
i have raced singlehanded, doublehanded and fully crewed on my pogo 30 in all conditions, its a comfortable boat and sometimes even wins races. I cant imagine sailing on an uncomfortable boat anymore but i am over 60. I have hit speeds of 16 on my own and 14 fully crewed. enuf sed
Dedicated Olson 30 owner and enthusiast. Can say almost exactly the same as above about our Olson. I agree though, it's a physical, not really comfortable boat, for older people (moi) especially. 14kt in an Olson 30 isn't hard to do, and there aren't (m)any competitors to an O30 in the 'bang for the buck in a 30-footer' category.

The "BFB" quotient probably doesn't increase much with 'turbo-ing'? A nice set of sails, a smooth bottom and a well sorted rig and stiff deck/interior structure is really what you need. It's possible to make the boat a bit more comfortable but you can't change the camber to the deck. There have been a few boats modded with an open transom cockpit which does arguably improve ergonomics. There are rudders available that will drive the boat more stably in a lot of breeze (but hurt performance in very light wind which for an O30 seems an odd giveaway, well sailed they are almost unbeatable boats on handicap in light breeze). But I don't think you can make the boat a whole lot better - it's such a well designed sailboat that anything you do to 'turbo' it is going to upset what's already a nearly perfect sailing package. Keep her heeled and the camber doesn't bother!
 

Hale Moana

Member
143
118
Morro Bay
The rudders on the first couple of boats could be spun around and you could scull the boat backwards with the rudder. These rudders were a little heavy on the helm so the rudder was changed.
Another interesting thing on Mas Rapido was the very tip of the bow had been knocked off by a faction of an inch. My friends asked about it and were told it was done to make the boat be just under 30' LOA. Don't know why that was important. Or if it was BS.

Lots of good memories sailing on the Mouse as we called her.
 

sam_crocker

Super Anarchist
1,567
127
PNW
Does anybody sail a Farr/Mumm 30 shorthanded? This would seem like the ride, assuming you can find one for sale at a non-exhorbitant price.

I haven't been on the Farr 30, but I did talk to a successful owner of one. He said they were tweaky, you lost a half knot of boat speed if the trimmer went to the low side to adjust trim. It might be hard to sail one to it's rating shorthanded.
 

Alaris

Super Anarchist
1,939
799
Annapolis
Since this a short handed thread. Hendo may have flatter decks but you try single handing that beast to its rating. The beauty of the Olson is every thing is within a reasonable reach for the helms-person and one person can keep the boat moving well. Has a Hendo ever won the SH race to Hawaii?
I have singlehanded the hendo but I wouldn’t recommend it.

I am not endorsing the hendo specifically. The thread asked about modern designs. Take the Melges 32, which is very similar to the hendo but faster and without runners, and 1000% would take it over the Olson.
 

Snowden

Super Anarchist
1,230
699
UK
Does anybody sail a Farr/Mumm 30 shorthanded? This would seem like the ride, assuming you can find one for sale at a non-exhorbitant price.

There's one sailed solo / 2H here in the Solent (Akarana IV). It looks like great fun but hard work. They have posted some handy results over the years, IIRC they don't go offshore

1670590095172.png
 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
48,079
11,728
Eastern NC
There's one sailed solo / 2H here in the Solent (Akarana IV). It looks like great fun but hard work. They have posted some handy results over the years, IIRC they don't go offshore

View attachment 558770

They don't look worried, they're not even both hiking. I think one of these would be fun, but obviously it's not going to sail to the same handicap as with a bunch of self-propelled ballast... and they are rather tweaky boats. My experience with them is both long ago and quite limited (I was one pay grade above self-propelled ballast) but they seem to be quite dependent on micro-adjustment of rig-tweakers.
 

pqbon

Anarchist
552
277
Cambridge UK
I haven't been on the Farr 30, but I did talk to a successful owner of one. He said they were tweaky, you lost a half knot of boat speed if the trimmer went to the low side to adjust trim. It might be hard to sail one to it's rating shorthanded.
The problem with most of the boats in the past 20-30years is that they require a lot of crew weight on the rail. The boats that do well short handed have form stability and ballast ratios to carry the right sails in the right wind.
 

[email protected]

Super Anarchist
1,301
725
43 south
I'll pipe in with my bias, uninformed opinion, having never even seen an Olson 30... Mt Gay 30s are no longer modern ~1/4 century old... not as much form stability as the current crop, but in mixed conditions will beat a J99 or SF3300 as often as not -at a small fraction of the cost... unfortunately they're hard to come by.
 

beercanned

Member
121
131
'fornia
I crew regularly on a Farr30. It's a stupidly fun boat to sail, but it's hunting for power in 7 knots of wind and fully powered up in 8 knots. It's a very abrupt transition.

The one posted by Snowden is a 'turbo' version with an added sprit, and all asymmetric, all furler headsails. It's not a boat that's at all easy to sail shorthanded in its one-design set-up.

But modded for asymmetric headsails, with a modified main halyard and a main configured for easier reefing and control lines led to the cockpit it is a very sporty short-hander.

The stock boat is basically a 30' dinghy.
 

beercanned

Member
121
131
'fornia
I haven't been on the Farr 30, but I did talk to a successful owner of one. He said they were tweaky, you lost a half knot of boat speed if the trimmer went to the low side to adjust trim. It might be hard to sail one to it's rating shorthanded.
But you seldom need to go down.

The mainsail controls are double ended and on the rails, (fine sheet, backstay, traveler, vang). The jib is trimmed with a double-ended jib car line also taken to the rail. To ease the jib we slide the car back, to trim in again, pull it forward. All from the high side.

And yes, the boat wants everyone on the high side in any decent amount of wind. It's a tender boat.
 

Snatch Block

Member
63
9
Canada
How much better; bang for buck, seconds over ground is a 200k plus new 30' shorthanded race boat is it better than an Olson 30? Would a completely refreshed and modernized turbo'd Olson 30 with a new rig, sails, keel change and rudder be that much slower or uncomfortable for 100k less?

Simpler North Americans sailors who don't attend OD races and generally sail shorthanded day races could argue maybe not...
I looked at the Henderson 30, Mumm 30, Flying Tiger and all 3 look totally inappropriate for short handed...and I alway come back to the Olson 30 because it has the 3 "P's - Price, performance and great PHRF rating.
 

Alaris

Super Anarchist
1,939
799
Annapolis
I looked at the Henderson 30, Mumm 30, Flying Tiger and all 3 look totally inappropriate for short handed...and I alway come back to the Olson 30 because it has the 3 "P's - Price, performance and great PHRF rating.
So the Hendo is out because of runners, the Mumm is out because of the pole, what is the mark against the FT?

How about the Melges 32 or J/92?

Wildcard non-30 footer: Antrim 27…
 
Top