John Drake
Banned
- Banned
- #1,461
And then there is the whole hell of a lot of folks who just don't go about stepping in front of the on coming train.
Maltese, while insinuating that CB and I are butt buddies probably makes you feel more manly it has little to do with the issue. I doubt that you are man enough to say it to my face. You all have the right to speculate and draw your own conclusions, I have a right to form my conclusions having talked to the captain and crew. Saving the people on board was his primary responsibility. If the boat sank in the storm that came through the following days, would you change your tune about leaving to soon? I don't know that CB has accepted any of the job offers, I just know that he is in the Carib sailing with his friends. Most all of the people that hire a captain for their yacht are wealthy, if you can't deal with them you will not be employed very long, it is not a bad trait.Jaybird,I'm glad your boyfriend CB has learned from his mistakes and is on to his next project feeling the breeze in his face and judging by your comments something else from the rear.....NoStrings, I hate to burst your bubble, but I don't think that CB is feeling any grief over what is said here. Hiis computer is still on Rainmaker. He doesn't give a shit what any of you think or speculate about this event. He gave the interview as an avenue to get the story out to his friends and family. They will not question his version of what happened because they know him. He has processed it, learned a lot, and moved on. All of his friends in the sailing community have been very supportive, particularly the GunBoat family. So carry on with all of the babble knowing that he is sailing and feeling the salt spray while you all are glued to your computers waiting for Clean to release part three.Clean might not like the thrashing his friend is taking, but he's largely responsible for it. Had he actually written and released the thing in a timely manner his buddy might have been saved a world of grief. It isn't like SA (and a lot of pilots forums) are renknown for their quality of mercy.Clean,
Well played. You are serializing this across what - maybe a week - and keeping everyone tuned in and coming back for more. Good for the hit counts for sure. I am sure you will catch a few people out - or maybe more than a few - that come up with theory A only to find out B or C happened B)
Now if you honestly want us to think it hasn't been all typed up ages ago .... :lol: :lol:
From personal experience I can tell you that when you get into the circle of working for these wealthy clients as a captain it takes a major screw up to get blacklisted.... (I'm talking like trying to bone the owners daughter or something). Saving the owner and his family's ass, no matter the cause or urgency, only probably gets you a pay raise in that world. What I'm getting at is that this doesn't mean that his continued employment should be viewed as some badge of honor or undeniable proof that his choices were all the right ones. It just means that he's got a tight relationship to the GB community and knows how to deal with the wealthy clientele they attract.... I agree a lot of the commentary about this whole episode has been overhyped and sometimes mean spirited but that is what SA is about so get over it. No need to play the knight in shining armor...
A lot here to learn from and it all starts from decision to leave port in forecast conditions and ends with reasons for leaving the ship without at least giving self rescue a respectable try... Just sayin....
Where you personally ever in a situation where you thought you might die in the middle of an ocean?Oh FFS. Many people have been in similar, and much worse predicaments, and not resorted to to abandoning the boat. Recently there was the young couple in the Pearson who had the entire side of their boat stove in by a breaking wave, separating the hull and deck, 100 mi off the Colombian coast. They made it to a safe anchorage. A couple decades ago, a delivery crew aboard a ULDB from Hawaii to mainland had the fucking keel drop off. They stabilized the boat and motorsailed back to Hawaii.THIS!!and if the rig hadn't come down, we never would have heard anything about this trip - unless there was a video of them going 25kts, in which case everyone here would have been saying how cool it was
The hand wringing thrashing and whipping coming from the armchair Sailor-Boy wannabes, or has-beens, and know-nothings, is of epic proportions in this thread. Pitiful.....
EDIT.. And also the same coming from experienced sailors, who should know better, fer chrisakes!!! If you have not been in a very similar situation yourself, shut your pie hole.
While sometimes this makes sense, and people over step their bounds I have to say that you're wrong about this 100%.THIS!!and if the rig hadn't come down, we never would have heard anything about this trip - unless there was a video of them going 25kts, in which case everyone here would have been saying how cool it was
The hand wringing thrashing and whipping coming from the armchair Sailor-Boy wannabes, or has-beens, and know-nothings, is of epic proportions in this thread. Pitiful.....
EDIT.. And also the same coming from experienced sailors, who should know better, fer chrisakes!!! If you have not been in a very similar situation yourself, shut your pie hole.
Yeah, everybody who thinks it was unwise to go for a fun sail off Cape Hattaras... not only in the dead of winter but into the teeth of a storm that was making national news... we're all a bunch of wanna-be sailors, huh.Oh FFS. Many people have been in similar, and much worse predicaments, and not resorted to to abandoning the boat. Recently there was the young couple in the Pearson who had the entire side of their boat stove in by a breaking wave, separating the hull and deck, 100 mi off the Colombian coast. They made it to a safe anchorage. A couple decades ago, a delivery crew aboard a ULDB from Hawaii to mainland had the fucking keel drop off. They stabilized the boat and motorsailed back to Hawaii.THIS!!and if the rig hadn't come down, we never would have heard anything about this trip - unless there was a video of them going 25kts, in which case everyone here would have been saying how cool it was
The hand wringing thrashing and whipping coming from the armchair Sailor-Boy wannabes, or has-beens, and know-nothings, is of epic proportions in this thread. Pitiful.....
EDIT.. And also the same coming from experienced sailors, who should know better, fer chrisakes!!! If you have not been in a very similar situation yourself, shut your pie hole.
Fixed.... ... ... ...
Most all of the people that hire a captain for their yacht are wealthy, if you can'tdeal withsuck up and pander to them you will not be employed very long... ... ...
Has the added benefits of completely removing you from the experience of sailing while also looking like a plastic box. Sign me up.http://www.yachtingworld.com/video/boat-tests/broadblue-rapier-550-video-47#Rapier 550 "The future of performance cruising"Brilliant. Go away to sea, and sit a leather-covered chair just like the one at your executive desk and in your executive car. Wankers.Also quite an interesting layout. Better for sail management, but imagine the shit storm when this rig fails. I'm not a cat guy; however, i'm thinking that keeping the rig on the outside might be a decent idea.![]()
What boat is in that picture, Wafi?
http://www.broadblue.com/rapier550/
Review here. How the hell do you trim the sails in one of these?
I agree that if lives are in danger, and it can't be quickly rectified, then you call for help. Where the disagreement is, is that imo their lives weren't in immediate danger and their problems could be sorted out, at the time they issued a mayday. By all means, a Pan-Pan to the CG and setting up a communication schedule was warranted.well, you appear to have conceded that when your life is no longer safe on the boat, you should call the USCG and get off the boat.If your home BBQ flares up, do you put it out or call the FD and stand out front until they arrive? If you call for a CG evac when you aren't in immediate danger, those CG assets aren't available to a vessel that might be in imminent danger. There were many "fails" that resulted in RM being in the predicament they found themselves, but imo until they collided with the freighter the boat was structurally sound, they could have effected a cover over the broken window, and waited for a chance to clear the self-inflicted fouled prop and construct a jury rig. The passengers/crew would be safer aboard a 55' carbon life raft than by attempting a risky transfer to the freighter at sea. Even the helo evac carries risks, though the CG is damn good at knowing their exact limits.
so, the only issue here - other than departing in the first place - is whether their lives were in sufficient danger to warrant them getting off
I wasn't there, and don't know.
as far as the freighter.., when they tried that, I think they were under the assumption that it might be the only way to get off - it was the USCG that arranged the attempt. I don't think anybody on either vessel can be faulted for how it worked out - it's not like you get to practice that sort of thing.., it either works well, or it doesn't.
I once was on a boat - in the middle of the ocean - where we assisted with radio communication between a sailboat that needed to get an injured person off and the cruise ship that they needed to come along side. seas were large, it was night, and I was scared just thinking about it
I also agree about the risk of a vessel to vessel transfer at sea. That's not something either vessel would routinely practice (excepting pilot to ship transfers, which are a bit different, but still risky). The plan would sort of develop on the fly, miscommunication likely (as resulted in the collision in RM's case). Perhaps a better plan for RM to use their RIB for the transfer?... IDK.
Dude, I said nothing about me, I am no one. So, just carry on with the circle jerk saying the same mostly stupid things over and over again...While sometimes this makes sense, and people over step their bounds I have to say that you're wrong about this 100%.THIS!!and if the rig hadn't come down, we never would have heard anything about this trip - unless there was a video of them going 25kts, in which case everyone here would have been saying how cool it was
The hand wringing thrashing and whipping coming from the armchair Sailor-Boy wannabes, or has-beens, and know-nothings, is of epic proportions in this thread. Pitiful.....
EDIT.. And also the same coming from experienced sailors, who should know better, fer chrisakes!!! If you have not been in a very similar situation yourself, shut your pie hole.
Should only those who have gone through it talk about it? Should the sailors that that could potentially find themselves in a situation like this one day just sit back, and read the know-it-alls posts about it? Reading the "interview" leaves one to believe it was simply shit luck, which we all know is completely false.
There is a LOT to learn from this event, and you need to get off your high horse and cut down on the pretentiousness that is rampant in sailing. I could not give a single fuck what you've done, who you are or how much of a better sailor you think you are than everyone else. If theres anything I can learn from this to improve my knowledge, my skills and hopefully never get myself into a similar situation, then I'll read. I'll post questions. This isn't about you. This isn't about just RainMaker and what's looking to be a terrible "pro" crew; this is about nailing down exactly what went wrong, why, and how to avoid that in the future. When you fuck up, you have to be able to admit why or you'll never learn. Maybe you're the one that should shut his mouth and stop spewing bullshit.
Bottom line, people are attacking each other rather than going for the facts. Clean wont answer, his homeboy is trying to save his career. There will be zero positive resolution to this. Maybe the owner will grow a pair and tell us what actually happened unless the claim is falsified(highly likely) and he can't divulge what really went down.
Shoulda held on to the Swan.+1Rainmaker was the existing name of the Swan 40 he bought from a retired airline pilot and renowned local sailor. I don't find it disruptive at all to keep someone else's boat name.Panebreaker
So, apparently, you boned the owner's daughter, and subsequently got cast from the garden.Jaybird,I'm glad your boyfriend CB has learned from his mistakes and is on to his next project feeling the breeze in his face and judging by your comments something else from the rear.....NoStrings, I hate to burst your bubble, but I don't think that CB is feeling any grief over what is said here. Hiis computer is still on Rainmaker. He doesn't give a shit what any of you think or speculate about this event. He gave the interview as an avenue to get the story out to his friends and family. They will not question his version of what happened because they know him. He has processed it, learned a lot, and moved on. All of his friends in the sailing community have been very supportive, particularly the GunBoat family. So carry on with all of the babble knowing that he is sailing and feeling the salt spray while you all are glued to your computers waiting for Clean to release part three.Clean might not like the thrashing his friend is taking, but he's largely responsible for it. Had he actually written and released the thing in a timely manner his buddy might have been saved a world of grief. It isn't like SA (and a lot of pilots forums) are renknown for their quality of mercy.Clean,
Well played. You are serializing this across what - maybe a week - and keeping everyone tuned in and coming back for more. Good for the hit counts for sure. I am sure you will catch a few people out - or maybe more than a few - that come up with theory A only to find out B or C happened B)
Now if you honestly want us to think it hasn't been all typed up ages ago .... :lol: :lol:
From personal experience I can tell you that when you get into the circle of working for these wealthy clients as a captain it takes a major screw up to get blacklisted.... (I'm talking like trying to bone the owners daughter or something). Saving the owner and his family's ass, no matter the cause or urgency, only probably gets you a pay raise in that world. What I'm getting at is that this doesn't mean that his continued employment should be viewed as some badge of honor or undeniable proof that his choices were all the right ones. It just means that he's got a tight relationship to the GB community and knows how to deal with the wealthy clientele they attract.... I agree a lot of the commentary about this whole episode has been overhyped and sometimes mean spirited but that is what SA is about so get over it. No need to play the knight in shining armor...
A lot here to learn from and it all starts from decision to leave port in forecast conditions and ends with reasons for leaving the ship without at least giving self rescue a respectable try... Just sayin....
You can draw your own conclusions.Steam Flyer - Are you suggesting that there is a cut-off point after which no boats should ever leave the East Coast? Noone should ever sail anywhere in the Winter? And they did not leave in front of a well-forecast/publicized storm. They left when THE FUCKING WEATHER ROUTER TOLD THEM TO. You saying you know more about weather routing than Commander's Weather?
.... ...
So, apparently, you boned the owner's daughter, and subsequently got cast from the garden.Jaybird,I'm glad your boyfriend CB has learned from his mistakes and is on to his next project feeling the breeze in his face and judging by your comments something else from the rear.....NoStrings, I hate to burst your bubble, but I don't think that CB is feeling any grief over what is said here. Hiis computer is still on Rainmaker. He doesn't give a shit what any of you think or speculate about this event. He gave the interview as an avenue to get the story out to his friends and family. They will not question his version of what happened because they know him. He has processed it, learned a lot, and moved on. All of his friends in the sailing community have been very supportive, particularly the GunBoat family. So carry on with all of the babble knowing that he is sailing and feeling the salt spray while you all are glued to your computers waiting for Clean to release part three.Clean might not like the thrashing his friend is taking, but he's largely responsible for it. Had he actually written and released the thing in a timely manner his buddy might have been saved a world of grief. It isn't like SA (and a lot of pilots forums) are renknown for their quality of mercy.Clean,
Well played. You are serializing this across what - maybe a week - and keeping everyone tuned in and coming back for more. Good for the hit counts for sure. I am sure you will catch a few people out - or maybe more than a few - that come up with theory A only to find out B or C happened B)
Now if you honestly want us to think it hasn't been all typed up ages ago .... :lol: :lol:
From personal experience I can tell you that when you get into the circle of working for these wealthy clients as a captain it takes a major screw up to get blacklisted.... (I'm talking like trying to bone the owners daughter or something). Saving the owner and his family's ass, no matter the cause or urgency, only probably gets you a pay raise in that world. What I'm getting at is that this doesn't mean that his continued employment should be viewed as some badge of honor or undeniable proof that his choices were all the right ones. It just means that he's got a tight relationship to the GB community and knows how to deal with the wealthy clientele they attract.... I agree a lot of the commentary about this whole episode has been overhyped and sometimes mean spirited but that is what SA is about so get over it. No need to play the knight in shining armor...
A lot here to learn from and it all starts from decision to leave port in forecast conditions and ends with reasons for leaving the ship without at least giving self rescue a respectable try... Just sayin....
Was it worth it?
and please forgive if it was instead the wife, sister, or mother in law. Perhaps I am reading too much into this...
One that will no doubt finally include a plausible explanation of how - after 28 hours of so of sailing following their departure from Hatteras Inlet, which included a full night @ 18-20 knot speeds, and then throttling back to 7-10 the next morning as conditions deteriorated - they still only managed to cover 200 NM, or thereabouts...Im sure part 3 will wrap up this whole fiasco with a nice purple bow.
I have been in situations similar to RM. Did I think I was going to die? No. Too busy dealing with the situation, and once things were under control and we could take a breath, there was no thought of dying.However, in my cases I knew I had the knowledge and assets to stabilize the situation and make what repairs/jury rigs were necessary. I wasn't aboard RM, of course. It may have been likely the captain and crew didn't have the experience and knowledge (despite 1000s of sea miles) to recognize what assets they had aboard, and how to utilize them. Examples: Use rear isinglass to repair broken window. Use anchor and ___ (berth cushios, perhaps?) to make a sea anchor. Dry out electronics and balky engine. Use longeron and storm jib, perhaps sun awning if aboard, to effect a jury rig. It appears they weren't aware of these and other options were possible, and their only option was to call for rescue.Where you personally ever in a situation where you thought you might die in the middle of an ocean?Oh FFS. Many people have been in similar, and much worse predicaments, and not resorted to to abandoning the boat. Recently there was the young couple in the Pearson who had the entire side of their boat stove in by a breaking wave, separating the hull and deck, 100 mi off the Colombian coast. They made it to a safe anchorage. A couple decades ago, a delivery crew aboard a ULDB from Hawaii to mainland had the fucking keel drop off. They stabilized the boat and motorsailed back to Hawaii.THIS!!and if the rig hadn't come down, we never would have heard anything about this trip - unless there was a video of them going 25kts, in which case everyone here would have been saying how cool it was
The hand wringing thrashing and whipping coming from the armchair Sailor-Boy wannabes, or has-beens, and know-nothings, is of epic proportions in this thread. Pitiful.....
EDIT.. And also the same coming from experienced sailors, who should know better, fer chrisakes!!! If you have not been in a very similar situation yourself, shut your pie hole.
If you actually had, I expect you would bloviate far less about how "you" would never have abandoned THIS ship! Poppycock!
But, hey! This is SA; carry on with the endless, mindless blathering.
For me; Dave Barrys column yesterday is far more entertaining than this nonsensical train wreck....EDIT - Circle Jerk!!
Just checked back in to this thread and found the problem right away - they built that thing with the hulls upside down.Holy crap.....that looks terrible. So why did the pretty one have to be abandoned at sea? The above boat will be around forever......I feel bad for the their slip mates. Imagine waking up to that every morning! The d-bad inside does not have to look at it.GB owners are sailors? Seriously?embrace diversity...I observed a trend over the years, to remove any aspect of sailing from sailing.
Furlers-check.
Electric winches-check.
Autopilot-check
No heeling condomarans-check
Let's get that ugly mast out of the middle of the salon-check
I agree... At some point why not do the obvious and remove mast and sails altogether? It's the logical endpoint. Then actual sailors will determine the market, and the condo-buyers can have their separate party barge market.
there are now sailboats for every kind of sailor - not just the kind of sailor you are
why should all sailboats be built to appeal to you?
Watch Clean's pimping video on the owners. One of the cutie wives talks with pride on her J105 accomplishments.
If you pull some of the old marketing materials you could reach the conclusion that Gunboat is really nothing more than a MacGregor on steroids... fast, light, go anywhere with the whole family... Now you can have a wider and faster MacGregor in any paint combination at less than 200 times the original cult(relabled Tribe) cost.
![]()
.Just checked back in to this thread and found the problem right away - they built that thing with the hulls upside down.Holy crap.....that looks terrible. So why did the pretty one have to be abandoned at sea? The above boat will be around forever......I feel bad for the their slip mates. Imagine waking up to that every morning! The d-bad inside does not have to look at it.GB owners are sailors? Seriously?embrace diversity...I observed a trend over the years, to remove any aspect of sailing from sailing.
Furlers-check.
Electric winches-check.
Autopilot-check
No heeling condomarans-check
Let's get that ugly mast out of the middle of the salon-check
I agree... At some point why not do the obvious and remove mast and sails altogether? It's the logical endpoint. Then actual sailors will determine the market, and the condo-buyers can have their separate party barge market.
there are now sailboats for every kind of sailor - not just the kind of sailor you are
why should all sailboats be built to appeal to you?
Watch Clean's pimping video on the owners. One of the cutie wives talks with pride on her J105 accomplishments.
If you pull some of the old marketing materials you could reach the conclusion that Gunboat is really nothing more than a MacGregor on steroids... fast, light, go anywhere with the whole family... Now you can have a wider and faster MacGregor in any paint combination at less than 200 times the original cult(relabled Tribe) cost.
![]()
That really isn't their job is it? Rescuing rich yachties off their toy (at great risk and cost for which they will not be compensated) isn't why they are there. This has been repeated a couple of times by some posters here - "the ship fucked up and ran into RM" - by people far more forgiving of the choices RM made thoughout. If I were a ships master, and read a little bit of that attitude on this thread, next time I heard about a yacht in distress I would just turn the radio down....In this case, the ship fucked up their intended maneuver and ran right through the bow of RM, and nearly sucked em under into the prop. Still probably the first/best option IMHO if there is a ship in proximity.
On that note, considering the details from my rescue and from RM rescue, it shocked me that ships had absolutely no equipment or training or any CLUE about the best tactics for transfers/rescues. When I came along side (in a 40ft monohull) we assumed that there would be some sort of crane or lifting tackle, MOB nets or life rings dangling, maybe even a rescue boat/RIB on standby if needed from the ship - but NOTHING - they just chucked a rope & batten pilot's boarding ladder down the side and said good luck. We had to improvise a lifting system on the spot and with great difficulty communicated our intentions to the bridge. Fortunately it worked out, but given the regularity of ships being called upon to assist in rescues, why isn't there more training involved for their crews or a SOP even? Surely they should be equipped to deal with one of their own crew overboard!!??
This is the Problem, not the Answer.They left when THE FUCKING WEATHER ROUTER TOLD THEM TO. You saying you know more about weather routing than Commander's Weather?