RAINMAKER DISMASTED OFF HATTERAS IN GALE

House Salad

Anarchist
931
5
WLIS
Does this event lead to the conclusion this boat's design is flawed for an off-shore capable catamaran?

Let's review:

• Rig comes down (this is nothing extraordinary, happens regularly, offshore and inshore)

• Crashes onto cabin top, breaks the big picture window, flooding main salon and electrics (this is now a catastrophic failure.

It appears no provision has been made to handle such an event) the window is now a 3'x4' hole to the North Atlantic.

• Starboard engine won't start, port engine does start, crew fails to ensure the prop won't tangle and so prop gets wrapped (this seems an avoidable crew mistake) and port engine is now out of commission (not catastrophic)

• Starboard engine is eventually started but stalls out (seems odd unless there was water being ingested by the intake air)

• Weather forecast is for more bad and possibly worse weather (this is the North Atlantic in mid-winter, nothing unusual here).

• Experienced delivery captain comes to the conclusion to abandon ship (same place and same conclusion as the recent Kiwi nutcases came to)

• Outcome: all crew safely rescued, vessel has not been found and appears a total loss (pretty much a regular occurrence in those waters).

In review: with one catastrophic failure of the main salon window the yacht is ultimately lost. It seems to me Either one of two things is true: the lack of a pre-departure damage control plan for this event is evidence of a lack of planning on the part of its crew or the design of these windows is not suitable for an off-shore vessel.

I'll never be in a position for afford a GB but if I were headed offshore, even in summer, it wouldn't be on this boat as designed.
The window was much bigger than 3' X 4'. I thought the nutcases were Australian, not Kiwi.

 
2,689
0
Does this event lead to the conclusion this boat's design is flawed for an off-shore capable catamaran?

Let's review:

Rig comes down (this is nothing extraordinary, happens regularly, offshore and inshore)

Crashes onto cabin top, breaks the big picture window, flooding main salon and electrics (this is now a catastrophic failure.

It appears no provision has been made to handle such an event) the window is now a 3'x4' hole to the North Atlantic.

Starboard engine won't start, port engine does start, crew fails to ensure the prop won't tangle and so prop gets wrapped (this seems an avoidable crew mistake) and port engine is now out of commission (not catastrophic)

Starboard engine is eventually started but stalls out (seems odd unless there was water being ingested by the intake air)

Weather forecast is for more bad and possibly worse weather (this is the North Atlantic in mid-winter, nothing unusual here).

Experienced delivery captain comes to the conclusion to abandon ship (same place and same conclusion as the recent Kiwi nutcases came to)

Outcome: all crew safely rescued, vessel has not been found and appears a total loss (pretty much a regular occurrence in those waters).

In review: with one catastrophic failure of the main salon window the yacht is ultimately lost. It seems to me Either one of two things is true: the lack of a pre-departure damage control plan for this event is evidence of a lack of planning on the part of its crew or the design of these windows is not suitable for an off-shore vessel.

I'll never be in a position for afford a GB but if I were headed offshore, even in summer, it wouldn't be on this boat as designed.
The boat had been in a disrupted sea state for hours.
Then why the fuck pay for all that disruptive technology on board!! ???
 

brishear

Member
52
0
Palma
I sailed on a Shipman 72 that had emergency vang release foot buttons, made a flying leap for those once or twice. Nice way to dump some power in an emergency!

 

NoStrings

Super Anarchist
8,088
7
Richmond, CA
Maybe it's just me, but I've always considered those boards under the bunks and settees to be sacrificial...IOW, they're boat salvage materials. Port blown out? Screw this piece of marine ply over it.

If it were me, my prime directive (thank you Mr. Spock) would be to 1) get the rig off of the boat, then 2) keep the water out, at all costs, 3) get the crew settled and a recovery plan underway. I might issue a pan pan at that point.

I can't believe, that CB, with all of his acclaimed experience would do anything different. If you sail, you save the boat, where the fuck else are you going to go?

What this massively edited narrative tells me is that the backstory is where the decisions were made. The owner had to have pulled the trigger, and given the alleged debris field, I would wonder if this unsinkable piece of disruptive technology were scuttled.

 

Trickypig

Super Anarchist
4,399
124
Australia
The focus on water coming into the saloon shouldn't be as big an issue. It's when it gets down the companionway and into the hulls that you have a sinking issue.

The electronics/electrics failure should be installed in any pilothouse with some thoughts of weatherproofing and even then it is really only the radio battery, starter battery and engine panels that need the most attention for weatherproofing.

Cold food, hand steering, manual winches and hand held GPS are the worst hardships, otherwise.

 

ropetrick

Super Anarchist
2,683
251
Maybe it's just me, but I've always considered those boards under the bunks and settees to be sacrificial...IOW, they're boat salvage materials. Port blown out? Screw this piece of marine ply over it.

If it were me, my prime directive (thank you Mr. Spock) would be to 1) get the rig off of the boat, then 2) keep the water out, at all costs, 3) get the crew settled and a recovery plan underway. I might issue a pan pan at that point.

I can't believe, that CB, with all of his acclaimed experience would do anything different. If you sail, you save the boat, where the fuck else are you going to go?

What this massively edited narrative tells me is that the backstory is where the decisions were made. The owner had to have pulled the trigger, and given the alleged debris field, I would wonder if this unsinkable piece of disruptive technology were scuttled.
Full agreement on all points.

OK; not so sure about the scuttling, but it is possible.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cold food, hand steering, manual winches and hand held GPS are the worst hardships, otherwise.
I wonder what is the back up steering on a GB55?

Where do you put that emergency tiller? if you even have one on your world circum-disrupto-navi-condomaran.

Look I think they look as cool as hell, I just wonder if we sort of forgot some of the real world back up processes that you need on boats out in the ocean.

6m plus waves? strong wind? what are the chances of that? in the ocean of all places....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the pictures posted, it looks like the big red button can't be reached from the helm because of the huge display consoles.

Me, myself I…. thinks that Keb’ should have the last word on this….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It2QOSUeQVk
I tried to resist the urge to out myself, but I think the aptly titled "Don't Suppose" by Erasure is much more appropriate:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYZnz2L3-vA

"Dream maker, heart-breaker, you would take everything away..."

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trickypig

Super Anarchist
4,399
124
Australia
Cold food, hand steering, manual winches and hand held GPS are the worst hardships, otherwise.
I wonder what is the back up steering on a GB55?

Where do you put that emergency tiller? if you even have one on your world circum-disrupto-navi-condomaran.

Look I think they look as cool as hell, I just wonder if we sort of forgot some of the real world back up processes that you need on boats out in the ocean.

6m plus waves? strong wind? what are the chances of that? in the ocean of all places....
I don't think that the steering was ever down.

Since it is a sailboat it's either manual hydraulic or chain and cable/dyneema. Either way steering should have been just fine.

emergency tillers… Now there's an issue. I'm not much of a multi sailor; maybe someone else knows the common setup.

 
Agree, steering was not a problem.

Was just taking it further to discuss what options there are in an emergency situation.

Given they had electrical issues it just made me wonder what are the backups on these boats?

A lot of systems appear to be electrical / hydraulic, which are great when they are working.

What do you do when these fail?

For example, is there a manual bilge pump?

 

Maltese52

Member
You can't scuttle an unsinkable boat. It's either unsinkable or it isn't.
DDW It's correct that corecell floats and highly likely that even if boat suffered structural damage from collision with ship during rescue attempt the boat would continue floating (albeit with about 80% of the hull under water IF both hulls were completely flooded and all seacocks opened...anyone doubting that can layup a foam composite panel and leave it floating in a bucket of seawater for several months to test the theory) I also doubt a large well built carbon structure could be torn apart by the seas to the point it was just debris without being beaten against rocks and lee shore. In all likelyhood it's still out there partially submerged and a potential hazard to navigation. I'd like to think given the knowledge of (complete) unsinkability that someone should/could have setup a way to track the boat but I guess that is easy to forget about in the heat of the moment but perhaps should be a consideration for most modern multihulls.
 

Christian

Super Anarchist
For open ocean sailing - I would say YES :rolleyes:

(I actually once was asked to sail a Star to Bermuda ages ago. I said GTFO!)

I don't get it. The boat failed in the forecast and expected conditions yet they boldly claim they would go do it again in the same conditions. Think they may have drunk the GB cool aid?
Do we know? Did the boat fail or did the helmsman on watch allow the boat to go through an uncontrolled gybe in changing and severe weather weather?

Until someone credible puts a stake in the ground on why or how the rig failed we do not know. One thing interesting. One of the most respected yacht designers alive post very early on the thread. Then nothing from the experienced and educated on yacht design. I can take you out on a Star Boat and break a rig in seconds. Does that mean all Star Boats are deeply flawed?
Hmmm, interesting thought. With reefing gear, I have no doubt a prepared Star could make Bermuda in decent weather. I've seen a Star weather a 50+ knot thunderstorm under full sail, although the sails were trashed afterward. Rig would not be a problem if you're very carefull. Accomodations would leave a lot to be desired.Uffa Fox sailed an Int 14 across the English Channel and back in the 30s. They had ballasted CBs and roller reefing back then.
Dude - don't be a complete idiot - while it may be possible to sail a star to Bermuda it is in no way shape or form a proper boat for being more than 10 miles from the dock - everyone, who has ever sailed one knows that. Hyperbole like the shit you just posted makes you stand out as an idiot - hope your post was just made in jest..............the relevance to the issue at hand is nil

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trickypig

Super Anarchist
4,399
124
Australia
For open ocean sailing - I would say YES :rolleyes:

(I actually once was asked to sail a Star to Bermuda ages ago. I said GTFO!)

I don't get it. The boat failed in the forecast and expected conditions yet they boldly claim they would go do it again in the same conditions. Think they may have drunk the GB cool aid?
Do we know? Did the boat fail or did the helmsman on watch allow the boat to go through an uncontrolled gybe in changing and severe weather weather?

Until someone credible puts a stake in the ground on why or how the rig failed we do not know. One thing interesting. One of the most respected yacht designers alive post very early on the thread. Then nothing from the experienced and educated on yacht design. I can take you out on a Star Boat and break a rig in seconds. Does that mean all Star Boats are deeply flawed?
Hmmm, interesting thought. With reefing gear, I have no doubt a prepared Star could make Bermuda in decent weather. I've seen a Star weather a 50+ knot thunderstorm under full sail, although the sails were trashed afterward. Rig would not be a problem if you're very carefull. Accomodations would leave a lot to be desired.Uffa Fox sailed an Int 14 across the English Channel and back in the 30s. They had ballasted CBs and roller reefing back then.
Dude - don't be a complete idiot - while it may be possible to sail a star to Bermuda it is in no way shape or form a proper boat for being more than 10 miles from the dock - everyone, who has ever sailed one knows that. Hyperbole like the shit you just posted makes you stand out as an idiot - hope your post was just made in jest..............
Sneeze on a Star and the rig goes over…

 

NoStrings

Super Anarchist
8,088
7
Richmond, CA
For open ocean sailing - I would say YES :rolleyes:

(I actually once was asked to sail a Star to Bermuda ages ago. I said GTFO!)

I don't get it. The boat failed in the forecast and expected conditions yet they boldly claim they would go do it again in the same conditions. Think they may have drunk the GB cool aid?
Do we know? Did the boat fail or did the helmsman on watch allow the boat to go through an uncontrolled gybe in changing and severe weather weather?

Until someone credible puts a stake in the ground on why or how the rig failed we do not know. One thing interesting. One of the most respected yacht designers alive post very early on the thread. Then nothing from the experienced and educated on yacht design. I can take you out on a Star Boat and break a rig in seconds. Does that mean all Star Boats are deeply flawed?
Hmmm, interesting thought. With reefing gear, I have no doubt a prepared Star could make Bermuda in decent weather. I've seen a Star weather a 50+ knot thunderstorm under full sail, although the sails were trashed afterward. Rig would not be a problem if you're very carefull. Accomodations would leave a lot to be desired.Uffa Fox sailed an Int 14 across the English Channel and back in the 30s. They had ballasted CBs and roller reefing back then.
Dude - don't be a complete idiot - while it may be possible to sail a star to Bermuda it is in no way shape or form a proper boat for being more than 10 miles from the dock - everyone, who has ever sailed one knows that. Hyperbole like the shit you just posted makes you stand out as an idiot - hope your post was just made in jest..............
Tell that to the Mexican that sailed a Finn to the Marquesas.

 

Trickypig

Super Anarchist
4,399
124
Australia
Agree, steering was not a problem.

Was just taking it further to discuss what options there are in an emergency situation.

Given they had electrical issues it just made me wonder what are the backups on these boats?

A lot of systems appear to be electrical / hydraulic, which are great when they are working.

What do you do when these fail?

For example, is there a manual bilge pump?
You may be touching on a mindset that was aboard Rainmaker. i.e. this boat works because of all the systems… and when they all went down it makes the boat seem inoperative. However the boat mostly doesn't need them.

1.Rudder : OK

2.Rig: I've never had to jury rig a boat offshore but I see it often enough. I should imagine with some ingenuity they could have achieved something workable even if the boat only did 4 knots with it. Just ask several French single handers.

3.Watertightness: Again, something jury rigged here. ie Jam the companionway door shut, caulk it with rags and don't use the port hull. Or close it as best you can and expect to do a bit of pumping now and again. Perhaps screw sailcloth over it.

Surely the boat has manual bilge pumps, some rag to clean the saloon sole off (bedding?). Surely they'd carry a sea anchor since cats lie to them so well. Surely they carried carry tools, handheld GPS, foulies to do watches in a somewhat less dry saloon and harnesses.

They had to make an assessment about risk of rescue verses risk of staying aboard. I think whilst it all ended well, the episode with the ship could have ended badly and made jury rigging the boat and sailing home seem the safer option.

… and don't call me Shirley

 

Christian

Super Anarchist
Dude - don't be a complete idiot - while it may be possible to sail a star to Bermuda it is in no way shape or form a proper boat for being more than 10 miles from the dock - everyone, who has ever sailed one knows that. Hyperbole like the shit you just posted makes you stand out as an idiot - hope your post was just made in jest..............
Tell that to the Mexican that sailed a Finn to the Marquesas.
What does that have to do with a multi million dollar toy that was damaged and abandoned due to hubris and lack of the ability to take the brochure claims with a grain of salt?

 

joneisberg

Super Anarchist
5,919
0
I don't think you mentioned in your questions or the "gaps" not having a sea anchor. That could have made a HUGE difference and I am surprised none was aboard.

That was one of my first thoughts when this story broke, as well, but now I'm not so sure... Mr Johnstone claims, after all, as proven by having ridden out 70 knot "gales" in the North Atlantic on other Gunboats, that the preferred tactic is to raise the boards, simply lie ahull, and let the boat 'skid' sideways, if I am reading that correctly. If RAINMAKER had been left to lie ahull with the starboard hull to weather, seems that the risk of getting too much water through the port companionway could have been minimized considerably...

Lying ahull might have also posed less risk to seas sweeping up onto the patio deck via the transom staircases, and made opening the starboard engine hatch to deal with that engine's issues a bit easier... Also, in the event conditions began to moderate sufficiently to consider putting someone overboard to deal with the fouled prop on the port side, there would likely be far less pitching at the ends of the hulls with the boat in that orientation, rather than lying head to the seas with a para-anchor... And finally, as mentioned earlier, I have my doubts about how long those folding bow cleats would have stood up to the potential forces of lying to a para-anchor in heavy conditions, anyway...

Additionally, one of the advantages of a multihull, is that the props are reasonably accessible from the water surface... Had they stayed with the boat, RAINMAKER could have benefited greatly from slapping one of these on the end of a standard extendable pole... Every boat with a prop reachable from the surface with a boat pole should have something similar aboard, IMO... And I would guess the owner of a $2.5 million boat could probably afford to have one custom-made with a ceramic blade, to deal that disruptive mass of high-tech rope...

adRotator_Hooknife.jpg


I'll give CB the benefit of the doubt, and presume he intended to say "drogue", instead of "drone", in the interview :) However, it was a bit surprising that he seemed to make no distinction between lying head to sea with a sea anchor, or running off to a drogue. A minor semantic detail, of course, but the interview reads as if what most understand a speed-limiting drogue can be intended to stream off the bow, as well...

What is apparent, however, is his ruling out the option of running off to a drogue, due to his concerns over "bring(ing) the stern up and bring(ing) water into the boat..." That's still perhaps the single biggest liability to this design for offshore sailing, in my opinion...

 
Last edited by a moderator:

jrtaylor

New member
29
0
Offshore on a multihull? With those picture windows?

Design flaws; see above.

A multihull doesn't get "rolled". Portholes are small for a reason.

My old man and I were talking about bringing his pilot schooner over to Europe from the Northwest. He wanted to make the cockpit smaller. Smaller. Right.

PS: Loved the Smeeton video.

 


Latest posts





Top