Rape trial dropped because attacks on the accuser endanger her health?

[Ease the sheet.]

YES!! or course it is. and it's your right to report it.
Of course, we usually choose not to go as far as reporting it as sexual assault when friends are involved. We simple ask them to stop.
A stranger feeling you up at a dinner is a completely different matter.

But 7 said he's made her aware that he doesn't like it and she still does it.

Sounds like she's got a bitch.

 

[ShortForBob]

But 7 said he's made her aware that he doesn't like it and she still does it.

Sounds like she's got a bitch.

Hmmm. made her aware how? women can be just as insensitive as men.
Has he told her in no uncertain terms that it makes him uncomfortable, pointedly removed her hand , shouted "will you get your fucking hand off my leg" in front of the group?

That's what we women are expected to do.

 

[Se7en]

Have you consented? Enthusiastically?

Already answered. She teases me about being standoffish.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

Hmmm. made her aware how? women can be just as insensitive as men.
Has he told her in no uncertain terms that it makes him uncomfortable, pointedly removed her hand , shouted "will you get your fucking hand off my leg" in front of the group?

That's what we women are expected to do.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

Already answered. She teases me about being standoffish.

Well, you obviously believe it's fine.

 

[ShortForBob]

Thanks for that. Good song.

 

[Se7en]

Well, you obviously believe it's fine.

No opinion of your own, so you resort to assuming mine?
How shallow.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

No opinion of your own, so you resort to assuming mine?
How shallow.

Don't mistake shallowness for not giving a fuck

It's not happening to me.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

Thanks for that. Good song.

Fucking great song!

 

[ShortForBob]

Already answered. She teases me about being standoffish.

And I assume she just jokes about it.
No one ever said that some women simply cannot understand how anyone could resist their "charms" and must be playing hard to get.
Just like some men.
Tell her to stop or you'll have to talk to her husband, your mate. If he knows she's of a flirtatious nature and he really is a good mate he'll tell her.
Of course it might irreparable break your friendship.

Why do you think women don't tell their girlfriends when their husband's behave badly?

 

[Goodvibes]

I see your learned friend randumb has dropped his conspiracy theory since learning about the nature of the document found.

No, I have not dropped the possibility that the document found, that all members of the Jury had been told 17 times not to use, had been left only when it looked like the vote would go 'guilty'.

These cunts would stop at nothing to protect their own. After all, these are the same people who will sell the future for our offspring for a few $'s now.

The legal system is wieghted against females claiming they were raped, it is now and always has been. These misogynist cunts are so conceited that they think all females should be grateful for a root from them. This is just one more example to females in Australia, not to complain, just get raped and take it as a normal part of life in a patriarchal society.

And about the legal system? I have no confidence in it at this level. The judicary are only one step away from the Priesthood in morality in my opinion.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

And I assume she just jokes about it.
No one ever said that some women simply cannot understand how anyone could resist their "charms" and must be playing hard to get.
Just like some men.
Tell her to stop or you'll have to talk to her husband, your mate. If he knows she's of a flirtatious nature and he really is a good mate he'll tell her.
Of course it might irreparable break your friendship.

Why do you think women don't tell their girlfriends when their husband's behave badly?

What makes you think he wants her to stop?

Low self-esteem makes people do the weirdest shit.

 

[ShortForBob]

What makes you think he wants her to stop?

Low self-esteem makes people do the weirdest shit.

Because he said so?

 

[Ease the sheet.]

Because he said so?

That doesn't seem to be working for him.

 

[Goodvibes]

Hmmm. made her aware how? women can be just as insensitive as men.
Has he told her in no uncertain terms that it makes him uncomfortable, pointedly removed her hand , shouted "will you get your fucking hand off my leg" in front of the group?

That's what we women are expected to do.

Grade 7. I was accosted in the class room by a girl!

We had to sit in order of where we came in the last exam. I ended up sharing a desk with this big fuzzy-haired blonde chick. We sat down, she looked like she was not happy, but she jambed her hand down the elastic wait band of my school shorts! Took a while to get her hand out.

 

[ShortForBob]

No, I have not dropped the possibility that the document found, that all members of the Jury had been told 17 times not to use, had been left only when it looked like the vote would go 'guilty'.

These cunts would stop at nothing to protect their own. After all, these are the same people who will sell the future for our offspring for a few $'s now.

The legal system is wieghted against females claiming they were raped, it is now and always has been. These misogynist cunts are so conceited that they think all females should be grateful for a root from them. This is just one more example to females in Australia, not to complain, just get raped and take it as a normal part of life in a patriarchal society.

And about the legal system? I have no confidence in it at this level. The judicary are only one step away from the Priesthood in morality in my opinion.

The juror who caused the Bruce Lehrmann trial to be aborted brought a further two research papers on sexual assault into the jury room, which were discovered after the trial was abandoned on Thursday.

The Lehrmann trial collapsed in sensational circumstances on Thursday after it was revealed a juror had brought in a research paper on sexual assault, contrary to repeated instructions.


In written reasons published late on Thursday, chief justice Lucy McCallum revealed that a further two documents have since been found. They were brought in by the same juror.

The first research paper discovered by sheriff’s officers attempted to quantify the prevalence of false complaints of sexual assault. It also included an analysis of the reasons for false complaints and why some are sceptical of true complaints. McCallum said the paper could have been used to influence jurors either way in the case.
“Following the discharge of the jury, I was informed by the sheriff’s officers that the same juror was also in possession of two additional academic articles on the topic of sexual assault,” McCallum wrote in a footnote.





McCallum had told jurors at least 17 times that they should not conduct outside research. The direction was given in no uncertain terms every day of the trial, sometimes on multiple occasions.

Jurors in the ACT cannot be punished for such misconduct. There is no offence available for the courts to mete out penalties to jurors who make their own inquiries about the case.

Juror who caused Bruce Lehrmann trial to be aborted brought in two other research papers, judge reveals

The man who has denied he raped Brittany Higgins is facing the prospect of another trial after a juror brought academic papers on sexual assault into the jury room

www.theguardian.com

 

[Goodvibes]

Already answered. She teases me about being standoffish.

I think you want to bonk her, but she's just playing you.

The juror who caused the Bruce Lehrmann trial to be aborted brought a further two research papers on sexual assault into the jury room, which were discovered after the trial was abandoned on Thursday.

The Lehrmann trial collapsed in sensational circumstances on Thursday after it was revealed a juror had brought in a research paper on sexual assault, contrary to repeated instructions.


In written reasons published late on Thursday, chief justice Lucy McCallum revealed that a further two documents have since been found. They were brought in by the same juror.

The first research paper discovered by sheriff’s officers attempted to quantify the prevalence of false complaints of sexual assault. It also included an analysis of the reasons for false complaints and why some are sceptical of true complaints. McCallum said the paper could have been used to influence jurors either way in the case.
“Following the discharge of the jury, I was informed by the sheriff’s officers that the same juror was also in possession of two additional academic articles on the topic of sexual assault,” McCallum wrote in a footnote.


McCallum had told jurors at least 17 times that they should not conduct outside research. The direction was given in no uncertain terms every day of the trial, sometimes on multiple occasions.

Jurors in the ACT cannot be punished for such misconduct. There is no offence available for the courts to mete out penalties to jurors who make their own inquiries about the case.

Juror who caused Bruce Lehrmann trial to be aborted brought in two other research papers, judge reveals

The man who has denied he raped Brittany Higgins is facing the prospect of another trial after a juror brought academic papers on sexual assault into the jury room

www.theguardian.com

So?

Is there some new information there?

 

[LB 15]

No, I have not dropped the possibility that the document found, that all members of the Jury had been told 17 times not to use, had been left only when it looked like the vote would go 'guilty'.

Oh so now you know what the jury were going to find? When they have taken that long then it is most likely that there was one or two that were refusing to be swayed (because like you, meli and ease they have no respect for ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ and simply wanted to hang him). So most likely it was heading for a hung jury.

 

[ShortForBob]

I think you want to bonk her, but she's just playing you.

So?

Is there some new information there?

Yep. two other documents were found after the case had been ordered for retrial and brought in by the same juror.
Seems very odd that they were not found together with the first. Someone ensuring that if one was swept up and not found, others would be? and someone with knowledge that they can't be prosecuted in the ACT.
Sometime conspiracy theories are real.

 

[Goodvibes]

Yep. two other documents were found after the case had been ordered for retrial and brought in by the same juror.
Seems very odd that they were not found together with the first. Someone ensuring that if one was swept up and not found, others would be? and someone with knowledge that they can't be prosecuted in the ACT.
Sometime conspiracy theories are real.

Well, that's only new information if you were yet to be convinced the first time.

What is a conspiracy theory anyway? It's a narrative that does not agree with the 'official' version. In this case, the very first time I heard it reported ... it stunk to high heaven!

A guaranteed way to ensure that the guy would never be found guilty. Now someone try to convince me that these cunts would not find a way to make that happen.