Rape trial dropped because attacks on the accuser endanger her health?

The Dark Knight

Super Anarchist
7,267
1,731
Brisvegas
If I had been raped and the legal system was clearly never going to deliver justice ... that's exactly what I would do, whatever it fucking takes to get a better result than nothing.
If you were so concerned about getting justice from the legal system, then you would go to the police FIRST. if the legal system lets you down, THEN you sue and use the media.

If at the time BH went to the media without intentions to go to the police, but Wilkinson or her producers convinced her to go to the police, especially to add more substance to the story, then she should be suing CH10 etc…
 

LB 15

Cunt
Is he not guilty then?

Like Pell is not guilty?
Pell has nothing to do with this except to be the precedent that stops people being convicted with out the complainant producing a single scrap of evidence- just like the prosecution couldn’t in this case. Thankfully the court of public opinion does not send people to jail. I have zero respect for Pell or his fucked up church but that doesn’t mean the onus of proof can be removed. You know the onus of proof is -you brought it up yourself. And cupcake you should be very careful as one day someone who thinks you are a cunt might just feel like making an unsubstantiated and untrue claim against you. And I am sure there are people that think you are a cunt out there...

However what I see from you, meli and the conspiracy lunatic on here, and from your fellow left wing Hand wringers on Facebook is that YOU see this as a lose for the left and that is completely fucked up. There are no winners in this- and you have no fucking idea if he raped her or not- nor do you care about justice, you just want to win a pissing contest.

However I will enjoy it if and when Lisa Wilkinson and the rest of those that convinced her that this was good idea( for their own benefit) get their arses handed to them in court.

Don’t get me wrong, if he did rape her he deserves to rot in hell, and if she was willing to see an innocent person go to jail so she can save face, then does she. But we will never know either way.
 

Ease the sheet.

ignoring stupid people is easy
20,386
2,364
Pell has nothing to do with this except to be the precedent that stops people being convicted with out the complainant producing a single scrap of evidence- just like the prosecution couldn’t in this case. Thankfully the court of public opinion does not send people to jail. I have zero respect for Pell or his fucked up church but that doesn’t mean the onus of proof can be removed. You know the onus of proof is -you brought it up yourself. And cupcake you should be very careful as one day someone who thinks you are a cunt might just feel like making an unsubstantiated and untrue claim against you. And I am sure there are people that think you are a cunt out there...

However what I see from you, meli and the conspiracy lunatic on here, and from your fellow left wing Hand wringers on Facebook is that YOU see this as a lose for the left and that is completely fucked up. There are no winners in this- and you have no fucking idea if he raped her or not- nor do you care about justice, you just want to win a pissing contest.

However I will enjoy it if and when Lisa Wilkinson and the rest of those that convinced her that this was good idea( for their own benefit) get their arses handed to them in court.

Don’t get me wrong, if he did rape her he deserves to rot in hell, and if she was willing to see an innocent person go to jail so she can save face, then does she. But we will never know either way.
Take out the lies, the hyperbole, the stupidity, the bullshit politics and the insults, and that's a half decent contribution.
 
Last edited:

LB 15

Cunt
If you were so concerned about getting justice from the legal system, then you would go to the police FIRST. if the legal system lets you down, THEN you sue and use the media.

If at the time BH went to the media without intentions to go to the police, but Wilkinson or her producers convinced her to go to the police, especially to add more substance to the story, then she should be suing CH10 etc…
Without a conviction against BL, her book deal is dead in the water. It would have wound up on the Kmart discount pile within a few days of its release anyway. Of course she could write a fiction novel. She seems to have a good imagination.
 
Last edited:

LB 15

Cunt
Sing along...
Here we go, here we go, here we goooooooooooooo, here we go, here we go....

Linda Reynolds informed ex-staffer Brittany Higgins intends to file $3 million compensation claim​

Brittany Higgins’ former boss Senator Linda Reynolds was advised on Friday that the former Liberal staffer intends to file a compensation claim.

“I confirm that I was advised in March this year by Blumers, who act for Brittany Higgins, of a civil claim by Ms Higgins against me and other parties,” Senator Reynolds said.

“However, proceedings are yet to be filed. Blumers advised me yesterday that their client intends to progress the civil claim this month.”

Ms Higgins also took to Instagram on Sunday, posting a text version of the speech she gave outside the ACT court when the first trial ended over juror misconduct.

The speech angered defence lawyers because among other issues it claimed that Mr Lehrmann, who has always maintained his innocence, was never asked to hand over his phone to police.

In fact, he was required to surrender his phone to police,
with calls he made raised by prosecutors and the defence during the trial.



 

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
1,082
316
Anyone else notice that the Rape Appologist in chief quotes primarily from news.com.
Another RWNJ Murdoch outlet.
Explains a lot really.
YEP! Our resident self proclaimed Centrist, repeats News.com headlines and raves, frothing at the mouth about 'Leftists'.

Oh, and he was also backing Pell, right down the line like the true RWNJ!

Odd init?
 

The Dark Knight

Super Anarchist
7,267
1,731
Brisvegas
87E9C281-27B4-493D-8CD9-C1E2DB786C0D.jpeg

Interesting that she would lie when making a statement post trial, then repeat the lie months later on Insta.

As for the scrutiny, perhaps his life would have been heavily scrutinised if he had done media interviews, book deals, having high profile social media account, speak at national press club and so on….
 




Top