Ease the sheet.
ignoring stupid people is easy
- 20,679
- 2,510
so a book deal is relevant to a rape allegation?No that was tended as a fact. Another swing and a miss by the leftists.
so a book deal is relevant to a rape allegation?No that was tended as a fact. Another swing and a miss by the leftists.
In the great State of Georgia (Michigan will be the national champions) the law required that a woman's word was not enough. In the past, there had to be additional evidence. As a practical matter, that may still be true. But legally, the testimony of a single witness, if believed, is sufficient. A good lawyer could convict him. A good jury would.The poor cunt had no chance of getting a fair jury trial, but regardless if he lost it would have been overturned on appeal because it was simply a 'he said/she said' without any evidence whatsoever and she is an proven unreliable witness.
Looks like you post a video of her documenting what really happened, complete with lying poli's and all of a sudden they want to talk a bout fiction writing!
Amazing init?
Nice deflection from the lying Poli's now visible for all to see.Meli posted a video from behind her super secret double block?
You can’t see the problem with that?
Amazing init?
The other women’s claims are not relevant to this case under our laws.so a book deal is relevant to a rape allegation?
Yes you have such a wonderful respect for women's rights in the US that the womenIn the great State of Georgia (Michigan will be the national champions) the law required that a woman's word was not enough. In the past, there had to be additional evidence. As a practical matter, that may still be true. But legally, the testimony of a single witness, if believed, is sufficient. A good lawyer could convict him. A good jury would.
I can't see the vidieo because Meli clearly dosent want anyone who will question it to see it, but my faviorite part of all of this is 'I put the dress in a plastic bag and never wore it again.'...Wait I forgot...I wore it to a function I attended with the person I am now about to sue a few months later. But I don't want to talk about this anymore because I have mental health issues.'Nice deflection from the lying Poli's now visible for all to see.
I don't use the ignore, but if I did, some posts could get me peeking back, most probably do.
But it's a useful diversion from the subject isn't it?
My favourite part was someone calling in the cleaners!
I can't see the vidieo because Meli clearly dosent want anyone who will question it to see it, but my faviorite part of all of this is 'I put the dress in a plastic bag and never wore it again.'...Wait I forgot...I wore it to a function I attended with the person I am now about to sue a few months later. But I don't want to talk about this anymore because I have mental health issues.'
Sure is. Speaks to motivation.so a book deal is relevant to a rape allegation?
There you go.
So it’s a deflection to have not seen a video that is hidden from me unless I peek. I do occasionally peek, but not so often unless posts replying to thin air get my interest.Nice deflection from the lying Poli's now visible for all to see.
I don't use the ignore, but if I did, some posts could get me peeking back, most probably do.
But it's a useful diversion from the subject isn't it?
My favourite part was someone calling in the cleaners!
Can’t compare our system with a 3rd world country.Yes you have such a wonderful respect for women's rights in the US that the women
who was raped now gets to keep the rapists baby in many states.
You see that is the difference between Australian and the US. Here a good lawyer would ensure that a person will not be found guilty on the basis of one persons uncorroborated version of events. You and Ease are confusing 'Beyond reasonable doubt' which is the standard for a criminal case with 'balance of probabilities' (or as you Americans call it 'Preponderance of the evidence') that applies in a civil matters. So your 'Good Lawyer' could only convince a 'Good jury' that the person is guilty based on one person word, if the defendants Lawyer was an 'hopeless arseclown' and the Jury is entirely composed of 'Biased Brain dead fuckwits'.
This is the situation now, but in two years when the 'good people' of the Divided States of America re-elect Donald Trump, and he revokes your constitution, The handmaids tale will be a documentary, not a fictional TV show.
If the justice system in the US was worth a 'Pinch of Shit', not only would Trumps skin be coloured orange, so would the jumpsuit he wears.
But anyway, thanks for playing.
Could be worse, could have been made by News.com. But at least you would have watched in then.I see it was made by the ABC. Who would have thought? Now that would be the only news outlet in the country that didn't run the story about the charges being dropped until the following day. Obviously they needed to have a meeting to work out how to spin it...
Looks to me like they are after Lisa's Logie for 'best actress in a drama series'.
I might watch it later, perhaps tonight.Could be worse, could have been made by News.com. But at least you would have watched in then.
Sucks when reality conflicts with your preferred narrative. I feel for you.
You can't but I can respond to someone who thinks Somalia has a superior system of justice. It is kinda how forums roll...Can’t compare our system with a 3rd world country.
Might as well compare with Somalia
You ain't getting your hand anywhere near my school shorts mate.I feel for you.
You ain't getting your hand anywhere near my school shorts mate.
That would never be admissible in a rape case, however it will be exhibit A in the flood of forthcoming Deformation actions. And now that Meli has posted it on here, both she and the owners of this site are now exposed to being co-defendants in one of their own.There you go.
Nothing ever happened to me.You *did* go to a private school, didn't you.... ?
FKT