Rape trial dropped because attacks on the accuser endanger her health?

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
988
293
So in the last 3 days the moron has gone from claiming she doesn't know if he raped anyone or not, to stating categorically that he is a 'serial rapist'. Her words.
And before she claims it is because of the article she quoted, she published these claims months ago in the 'Still call Australia home' thread. In fact she did it after the Judge had said that this matter should not be discussed on social media.
And as 007 has pointed out she also lied about BH's age so she could refer to her a child.
The only fact is that she is a serial liar that will make anything up that suits her without remorse.

I guess we can put anything she has ever posted on here into the bullshit category. (Not that most of us hadn't already) including her claim that her husband left her for an younger Asian women because he was mentally ill. Au contraire, he would have been insane to stay with the lying bitter POS. Now I know we shouldn't take people on this site on face value but ever since she posted that famous selfie, we know we can.

How the fuck does she hold down her job, even one as menial as a book stacker?
yoda-star-wars.gif
 

LB 15

Cunt
I fear getting bored by your repetitive use of the same meme gifs.

I don't recall seeing this one, so thanks.
Well he has been bitch slapped every time he has posted in this thread, so innuendo and memes are all he has. And remember all that is required is an accusation in his court.
Anyway for fun, lets try a direct question. Why do you think Meli lied about BH's age in her post?
 

ShortForBob

Super Anarchist
35,403
2,924
Melbourne
While it is no longer permissible to bring up a rape victims sexual history in a trial because it's irrelevant. The victim and defendants character is poured over, often it's a major part of a prosecutors case when there are no witnesses.

It was perfectly ok to find a man guilty of murder because of his affair with the babysitter.

I do find it odd that a defendant's past "relationships" cant be brought up in a rape trial.
These other women signed statements and reported the attacks to police.
Maybe they were and that's why someone successfully got the trial dropped.

I'll say it again, The man is a serial rapist.


A third woman has alleged she was sexually assaulted by the same former federal government advisor accused of raping former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

Key points:​

  • The report is carried in The Australian newspaper today
  • The rape reportedly happened in 2016, three years before the Brittany Higgins incident
  • A bipartisan inquiry into Parliament's workplace culture is set to be established next week

The Australian newspaper today reported that the woman alleges she was assaulted after a night of drinking with the then-political staffer while volunteering for the Coalition's 2016 election campaign.

She spoke to the newspaper on the condition of anonymity but has reportedly provided a statutory declaration to support her claims.
 
Last edited:

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
988
293
I'll say it again, The man is a serial rapist.

And I will say again that if ever there was an opportunity for the RWNJ's to squash a case, they would take it! No consequences!

So what were the 17 reminders about what not to do ...
1. Coaching?
2. Or, that the judge knew something was afoot?
 

LB 15

Cunt
And I will say again that if ever there was an opportunity for the RWNJ's to squash a case, they would take it! No consequences!

So what were the 17 reminders about what not to do ...
1. Coaching?
2. Or, that the judge knew something was afoot?
Well interestingly Randy, I have found out that in the ACT a unanimous verdict by the Jury is required for a conviction, but not for an acquittal. Let your tiny mind work on that for a minute. Do you want me to spell it out for you? If the Jury could not reach a unanimous verdict, he walked. So who do you think might have benifed from the mistrial?

The nature of the question that the Jury foreman asked when seeking direction from the judge only a few days before they 'Discovered' the document was precisely about that...

However you will be pleased to hear that Scomo may not have had Parliamentary Privilege when he apologized to BH. Which puts him in BL sights as well.

But that maybe harder to get a result from than BH, LW, Chanel 10 and Four corners which as it was described to me as being like 'shooting fish in a barrel.' You could also add to that list anyone stupid enough to post 'BH is a serial rapist' on say, the worlds largest sailing forum.

So you better stock up on Buthurt cream old boy because you have pain ahead over the next few years.
 

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
988
293
Well interestingly Randy, I have found out that in the ACT a unanimous verdict by the Jury is required for a conviction, but not for an acquittal. Let your tiny mind work on that for a minute. Do you want me to spell it out for you? If the Jury could not reach a unanimous verdict, he walked. So who do you think might have benifed from the mistrial?

The nature of the question that the Jury foreman asked when seeking direction from the judge only a few days before they 'Discovered' the document was precisely about that...

However you will be pleased to hear that Scomo may not have had Parliamentary Privilege when he apologized to BH. Which puts him in BL sights as well.

But that maybe harder to get a result from than BH, LW, Chanel 10 and Four corners which as it was described to me as being like 'shooting fish in a barrel.' You could also add to that list anyone stupid enough to post 'BH is a serial rapist' on say, the worlds largest sailing forum.

So you better stock up on Buthurt cream old boy because you have pain ahead over the next few years.
Why are you so afraid of a he said she said victory?

Is there something you are not telling your shipmates?
 

LB 15

Cunt
The latest doubling down from our resident Deformation queen...

"While it is no longer permissible to bring up a rape victims sexual history in a trial because it's irrelevant.
I do find it odd that a defendant's past "relationships" cant be brought up in a rape trial.
I'll say it again, The man is a serial rapist."
He is coming for your library card Sweetpea. The smartest thing you could do now is to close your account and fuck off to Greece...

Wait..Google...Google...

Australia has bilateral extradition relationships with the following countries:


ArgentinaHong KongMalaysiaSpain
AustriaHungaryMexicoSweden
BelgiumIndiaMonacoSwitzerland
BrazilIndonesiaNetherlandsTurkey
ChileIrelandNorwayUnited Arab Emirates
EcuadorIsraelParaguayUnited States of America
FinlandItalyPhilippinesUruguay
FranceKoreaPolandVenezuela
GermanyLatviaPortugalVietnam
GreeceLuxembourgSouth Africa

No that won't work. But the good news is that you are safe in North Korea, China and Russia, but you days on social media will be over.

Just how fucking stupid are you?
 
Last edited:

LB 15

Cunt
Why are you so afraid of a he said she said victory?
So why are you so afraid of actually saying what you are hinting at?
But to answer your question I have no fear personally at all, but the abandonment of the principals of law is a danger for all. Tell me, are you a cupboard Trump supporter?

Nothing to say about the facts I posted I see? So to be clear I am asking you directly Random/Astro/ Goodvibes - who had the most to benefit from a mistrial now that we know a hung Jury would result in an Acquittal?
 

Goodvibes

under the southern cross I stand ...
988
293
So why are you so afraid of actually saying what you are hinting at?
But to answer your question I have no fear personally at all, but the abandonment of the principals of law is a danger for all. Tell me, are you a cupboard Trump supporter?

Nothing to say about the facts I posted I see? So to be clear I am asking you directly Random/Astro/ Goodvibes - who had the most to benefit from a mistrial now that we know a hung Jury would result in an Acquittal?
That's an easy one to answer.

It has gone exactly to the RWNJ script. Trash the trial, knowing that she was struggling and unlikely to go again! No conviction for the alleged rapist.

It's about risk management. It worked.
 

LB 15

Cunt
This is too good not to play with further


So Meli thinks that the defendant (who has the presumption of innocence) should have his (or her - but of course this may not apply if a women is accused of rape)) past sexual history admited at trial, but the accuser (who's counsel is required to prove the other parties guilt) should not?

YCMTSU.

Better still, untested accusations, resulting in no charges whatsoever should be admissible, even if (in a hypothetical situation) the accuser is known to have the morals of a ally cat and has brought numerous unsuccessful rape allegations against multiple men, should not be admissible?
Look I know you feel fucked over by your ex, but your hatred of all men (except Bill Shorten obviously) is seriously disturbing.

When you move to China and settle in, you should see someone about this issue. They are all for women rights. Hey I checked the list again and Saudi Arabia is safe as well. And there is no need to keep dying your hair if you are wearing a Burka.
 
Last edited:

The Dark Knight

Super Anarchist
7,255
1,726
Brisvegas
If you have not taken too many drugs once or twice, I feel sorry for you.

That must be why you are so myopic in your views.
You are not the brightest are you...

Sorry for not spelling out my "Excessive drug use fucks people’s minds" comment. By this I mean regular taking of drugs over and extended period of time, ie someone who smokes several joints (minimum) daily over many years.
 

Latest posts




Top