Rape trial dropped because attacks on the accuser endanger her health?

[The Dark Knight]

The latest doubling down from our resident Deformation queen...


He is coming for your library card Sweetpea. The smartest thing you could do now is to close your account and fuck off to Greece...

Wait..Google...Google...

Australia has bilateral extradition relationships with the following countries:

Argentina	Hong Kong	Malaysia	Spain
Austria	Hungary	Mexico	Sweden
Belgium	India	Monaco	Switzerland
Brazil	Indonesia	Netherlands	Turkey
Chile	Ireland	Norway	United Arab Emirates
Ecuador	Israel	Paraguay	United States of America
Finland	Italy	Philippines	Uruguay
France	Korea	Poland	Venezuela
Germany	Latvia	Portugal	Vietnam
Greece	Luxembourg	South Africa

No that won't work. But the good news is that you are safe in North Korea, China and Russia, but you days on social media will be over.

Just how fucking stupid are you?

Doubling down now...Lot of drinking these girlies do...

How can you make a stat dec anonymously?
View attachment 558287

Shortforstupid said:

"While it is no longer permissible to bring up a rape victims sexual history in a trial because it's irrelevant.
I do find it odd that a defendant's past "relationships" cant be brought up in a rape trial.
I'll say it again, The man is a serial rapist."

Wow, she is getting dumber the more she posts.

Is there such a thing as a negative IQ?

 

[The Dark Knight]

This is too good not to play with further


So Meli thinks that the defendant (who has the presumption of innocence) should have his (or her - but of course this may not apply if a women is accused of rape)) past sexual history admited at trial, but the accuser (who's counsel is required to prove the other parties guilt) should not?

YCMTSU.

Better still, untested accusations, resulting in no charges whatsoever should be admissible, even if (in a hypothetical situation) the accused is known to have the morals of a ally cat and has brought numerous unsuccessful rape allegations against multiple men, should not be admissible?
Look I know you feel fucked over by your ex, but your hatred of all men (except Bill Shorten obviously) is seriously disturbing.

When you move to China and settle in, you should see someone about this issue. They are all for women rights. Hey I checked the list again and Saudi Arabia is safe as well. And there is no need to keep dying your hair if you are wearing a Burka.

I suspect that she'd be happy with, no trial and straigh form charges to sentencing to execution.

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned​

It makes me wonder if her ex-hubby might have done something simillar after a few office parties. Going to prison rather than Thailand would have put a dampener on his divorce celebrations.

Still prison would have been more enjoyable than staying with Meli

 

[LB 15]

That's an easy one to answer.

It has gone exactly to the RWNJ script. Trash the trial, knowing that she was struggling and unlikely to go again! No conviction for the alleged rapist.

It's about risk management. It worked.

Interesting. But a few days ago you claimed that 'Half the Jury' thought he was guilty and that means without a unanimous verdict, he walks. Can you explain why 'RWNJ's' (By that i gather your mean those that respect and understand the law) would want that? I would have thought that it was more in the interest of you 'I don't give a fuck about justice, hang him high' types.

Painted yourself nicely into a corner there old mate.

Oh and I watched Meli's video. Not a single shred of evidence or fact just a bunch of talking heads with an axe to grind against the Government of the day saying nothing, and some dramatizations. There was the security guard with the eyebrow piecing that admitted she left a 'Disorientated, naked women' alone on a couch because 'It wasn't her job' to do anything about it. Nice.
But she did close the door to 'protect her dignity'. Good for her.

The only thing of interest was BH's claim on the project interview when she said that she didn't understand why he was buying her so many drinks, yet under oath she had to admit she had bought her own.

There was also the part when she said 'I realized I had been raped. And then laughed.

But it was on the ABC who are good at making comedy and shows for children.

 

[Goodvibes]

Interesting. But a few days ago you claimed that 'Half the Jury' thought he was guilty and that means without a unanimous verdict, he walks. Can you explain why 'RWNJ's' (By that i gather your mean those that respect and understand the law) would want that? I would have thought that it was more in the interest of you 'I don't give a fuck about justice, hang him high' types.

Painted yourself nicely into a corner there old mate.

Oh and I watched Meli's video. Not a single shred of evidence or fact just a bunch of talking heads with an axe to grind against the Government of the day saying nothing, and some dramatizations. There was the security guard with the eyebrow piecing that admitted she left a 'Disorientated, naked women' alone on a couch because 'It wasn't her job' to do anything about it. Nice.
But she did close the door to 'protect her dignity'. Good for her.

The only thing of interest was BH's claim on the project interview when she said that she didn't understand why he was buying her so many drinks, yet under oath she had to admit she had bought her own.

There was also the part when she said 'I realized I had been raped. And then laughed.

But it was on the ABC who are good at making comedy and shows for children.

Wow, talk about the lady doth protest ... etc You are frothing at the mouth over this.

That a unanimous verdict is required has nothing to do with the fact that half the jury thought he was guilty. Suck it up Princess. Some people who heard all the evidence in court, considered it enough to convict him.

You are scrambling, you know that she was raped but your politics do not allow you to accept it.

You need to meditate on this, I forgive you.

 

[00seven]

Wow, talk about the lady doth protest ... etc You are frothing at the mouth over this.

That a unanimous verdict is required has nothing to do with the fact that half the jury thought he was guilty. Suck it up Princess. Some people who heard all the evidence in court, considered it enough to convict him.

You are scrambling, you know that she was raped but your politics do not allow you to accept it

You need a cite for these or you're bullshitting again Randy.

And there's some here that heard none of the evidence in court but consider the allegation is enough to convict him.

 

[LB 15]

half the jury thought he was guilty.

So it was you who left the document in the Jury room. How else could you know this?

Some people who heard all the evidence in court, considered it enough to convict him.

Indeed some that have no idea what evidence was tended and have no interest or understanding about the process of law (like you) thought he was guilty the second they heard the word government Minister.
So riddle me this - If half the jury (again how you know this I have no idea) that is to say 6 members of the panel, think he was guilty, then the other 6 didn't. So now not only don't you need a unanimous verdict, half is enough?

Will this apply in Melis upcoming deformation trial?

 

[LB 15]

Wow, talk about the lady doth protest

I agree completely, but I don't see many of her posts since she gas me on ignore.
But why are you so obsessed with this? It is clearly not because you want to see justice done. Its over Cupcake, well his trial anyway and he has no further charges against him.
Bit the real fun is about to begin, Sadly most of the cunts will settle with him out of court and the only Defos that will get to court will be Inner city Melbourne online trolls that will have no option but to defend thenselves.

 

[Goodvibes]

Big swinging dicks and the rule of law​

 

[Goodvibes]

This is the culture she was raped in.​

Julie Bishop Says A Group Of Dudebro Lib MPs Call Themselves The ‘Big Swinging Dicks’ Club​

In an interview with Leigh Sales last night on ABC’s 7.30, Julie Bishop was questioned about the sexist male culture that exists within Parliament House, as well as former Liberal minister Sharman Stone’s claims that a group of Liberal MPs called the “big swinging dicks” attempted to block Bishop’s goals towards leadership.

Stone claimed that these individuals conducted “secret men’s business”, and now, Bishop has backed up those allegations.

“I believe it was the ‘big swinging dicks’. So there was obviously an overexcited imagination on the part of some, I would suggest,” Bishop said.

 

[Mid]

how's them coat tails LB ? certainly got lots holding on to them .

 

[ShortForBob]

4 women have made accusations against this man. 3 of them being accusations of rape.
and the usual suspects only want to post insults.

It's very strange that throughout this thread, non of them feels the need to examine the lies and prevarications of the defendant (and there are many)

All this talk of a hung jury is nonsense as is Rando's claim that half the jury would find him guilty.
We have no idea what was in the juries minds before those documents were found. No idea what information they were privy to. No idea how they would have voted.

So now we are all able to speculate.

And those 4 accusations of rapes and sexual assault happening in almost identical circumstances would put no unreasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person.

But some cling to the law, (which we can no longer rely on in this case) to try the victim and find her guilty of not being raped quietly, of wearing no knickers and wanting her accusations heard in the loudest way possible. Her doing so was in hindsight, the best thing she could do to get any justice.

This was always going to be a very public case, the outcome would have been no different if she'd whispered her accusations against the defendant and the handling of it by her bosses.

Lerhmann would still have gone to trial and parties in government would still have done what they did and it would have come out to the press.

How dare she be loud while the accused is oh so silent.

 

[ShortForBob]

Wow, talk about the lady doth protest ... etc You are frothing at the mouth over this.

That a unanimous verdict is required has nothing to do with the fact that half the jury thought he was guilty. Suck it up Princess. Some people who heard all the evidence in court, considered it enough to convict him.

You are scrambling, you know that she was raped but your politics do not allow you to accept it.

Unfair. It's not his politics that refuse to accept it.
This isn't about politics but LB finds that making it so is a useful distraction from the beliefs that a minority hold. That women should be seen and not heard. Especially not stand up in public and defy those that hold power or defend those who have non
There's a pattern to his attacks.

On Violet Coco.
"No, she simply wanted to get her head on TV and to believe she is some kind of environmental Che Guiana. If she wants to be famous she should shave her armpits and her beaver, have a bath and start an only fans page."

Gretta, Lydia, Julia G, Kristia K, various female politicians. All a pattern. and the best he can do is attack personal appearances

And you know why he hates being on ignore?
Because he's not in control.
I choose if and when I see his posts and he has to log out and search for mine, and he hates it.

 

[Fah Kiew Tu]

Still prison would have been more enjoyable than staying with Meli

Reminds me of an old joke.

A wife comes home and finds her husband sitting at the kitchen table, with their wedding photo in his hands, crying.

She asks him what's so sad.

"Do you remember back when you were 15, and we were screwing on the couch?"

"Yes honey, I remember that just fine".

"And do you remember how your father came home, caught us at it and threatened me with a shotgun, told you that if I didn't marry you, he'd have me sent to prison for 20 years?"

"Yes, honey, I remember that fine. But WHY are you crying?"

"I would have gotten out today".

FKT

 

[LB 15]

I don’t hate it at all it has simply made you irrelevant. But you obviously spend hours living in and out so knock yourself out. As for your last two posts- have you been scoring from random? Like I said like you I have no idea what happened on the couch. But I do know how defo works and if someone drops a dime about you to BL’s lawyers, you are fucked. Not hard to find out who you are from your oversharing.

 

[ShortForBob]

Oh BTW, it's defamation

 

[Goodvibes]

I don’t hate it at all it has simply made you irrelevant. But you obviously spend hours living in and out so knock yourself out. As for your last two posts- have you been scoring from random? Like I said like you I have no idea what happened on the couch. But I do know how defo works and if someone drops a dime about you to BL’s lawyers, you are fucked. Not hard to find out who you are from your oversharing.

LB, working flat out for his RWNJ masters, attempting to shut down discent by making legal threats!

That's RWNJ tactics 101. Works too because the masters have all the money and the servant wenches got nothing, they get kicked out of the damp basement bedroom they share with the rest of the slaves.

 

[00seven]

Bwahahahaa!!! You're stupid Meli, flat out dumb.

When I want to see what you post I have a second browser open then snip your bullshit for all to see. There's no logging in and out.

To be honest though, I really don't miss your rubbish. I full well understand why WBF fucked you the fuck off.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

While it is no longer permissible to bring up a rape victims sexual history in a trial because it's irrelevant. The victim and defendants character is poured over, often it's a major part of a prosecutors case when there are no witnesses.

It was perfectly ok to find a man guilty of murder because of his affair with the babysitter.

I do find it odd that a defendant's past "relationships" cant be brought up in a rape trial.
These other women signed statements and reported the attacks to police.
Maybe they were and that's why someone successfully got the trial dropped.

I'll say it again, The man is a serial rapist.

Third woman alleges she was sexually assaulted by same man accused of raping Brittany Higgins

A third woman alleges she was sexually assaulted by the same former federal government advisor accused of raping former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

www.abc.net.au

A third woman has alleged she was sexually assaulted by the same former federal government advisor accused of raping former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

Key points:​

• The report is carried in The Australian newspaper today
• The rape reportedly happened in 2016, three years before the Brittany Higgins incident
• A bipartisan inquiry into Parliament's workplace culture is set to be established next week

The Australian newspaper today reported that the woman alleges she was assaulted after a night of drinking with the then-political staffer while volunteering for the Coalition's 2016 election campaign.

She spoke to the newspaper on the condition of anonymity but has reportedly provided a statutory declaration to support her claims.

This thread has been ruined by those who have used character attacks, lies, and innuendo, to discredit the complainant and to generally distract from what actually happened.

A book deal is material in a rape case? What a load of bullshit. Conversations with the press? Another big steaming log.


The actual evidence given by witnesses is damning.

The defence went out of its way to character attack the complainant because the couldn't argue the facts of the actual matter.

It's fucking shameful.



Cue the supporters of mob mentality.

 

[Goodvibes]

To be honest though, ..

Nice change bro, should be more of it.

 

[Ease the sheet.]

4 women have made accusations against this man. 3 of them being accusations of rape.
and the usual suspects only want to post insults.

It's very strange that throughout this thread, non of them feels the need to examine the lies and prevarications of the defendant (and there are many)

All this talk of a hung jury is nonsense as is Rando's claim that half the jury would find him guilty.
We have no idea what was in the juries minds before those documents were found. No idea what information they were privy to. No idea how they would have voted.

So now we are all able to speculate.

And those 4 accusations of rapes and sexual assault happening in almost identical circumstances would put no unreasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person.

But some cling to the law, (which we can no longer rely on in this case) to try the victim and find her guilty of not being raped quietly, of wearing no knickers and wanting her accusations heard in the loudest way possible. Her doing so was in hindsight, the best thing she could do to get any justice.

This was always going to be a very public case, the outcome would have been no different if she'd whispered her accusations against the defendant and the handling of it by her bosses.

Lerhmann would still have gone to trial and parties in government would still have done what they did and it would have come out to the press.

How dare she be loud while the accused is oh so silent.

The law is fine, the rapist will not file civil proceedings because he will lose.

And this thread, and all the similar threads will be consigned to the trash heap of the archives.


And LB, DK, Grumpy and fkt will consider their actions here a bright point in their lives.

Because the trolls have won.

Fuckers don't even know what the prize is...