Roy Moore 3rd rail?

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
Speaking only from my own personal experience I have not been mocked for believing Trump is unfit.  Have you?
I have not been mocked, per se.  Insulted and called all sorts of names - yes.  

Some even suggest I suffer from TDS.  Who might that be?

This from folks who feel the need to defend the current President as if he were fit and qualified to occupy the office and any suggestion otherwise deserves a vigorous opposition.

I was simply trying to find if you reserve the same umbrage for those who support President Trump as you do for those who supported President Clinton.  You know, consistency.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

d'ranger

Super Anarchist
30,185
5,166
There were many people who didn't think Clinton's behavior was acceptable at the time. They were generally mocked.
It didn't help that those leading the charge were proven to be hypocrites.  And thanks for avoiding or missing the point. 

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
I have not been mocked, per se.  Insulted and called all sorts of names - yes.  

This from folks who feel the need to defend the current President as if he were fit and qualified to occupy the office and any suggestion otherwise deserves a vigorous opposition.

I was simply trying to find if you reserve the same umbrage for those who support President Trump as you do for those who supported President Clinton.  You know, consistency.
It not umbrage at their support, they can support whoever they want. It's when they start preaching their holier than thou ethics to me that I push back.

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
It didn't help that those leading the charge were proven to be hypocrites.  And thanks for avoiding or missing the point. 
Your point was that society has changed and what was acceptable then is not now. My point is that for some it was not acceptable even then.

 

SloopJonB

Super Anarchist
72,091
14,517
Great Wet North
It not umbrage at their support, they can support whoever they want. It's when they start preaching their holier than thou ethics to me that I push back.
Clinton had a boorish affair with a consenting adult.

Trump bragged about being able to sexually assault women with impunity.

Moore sexually assaulted children.

You can't see any moral difference between them?

Really?

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
I have not been mocked, per se.  Insulted and called all sorts of names - yes.  

Some even suggest I suffer from TDS.  Who might that be?

This from folks who feel the need to defend the current President as if he were fit and qualified to occupy the office and any suggestion otherwise deserves a vigorous opposition.

I was simply trying to find if you reserve the same umbrage for those who support President Trump as you do for those who supported President Clinton.  You know, consistency.
BTW...Do you reserve the same umbrage for those who supported President Clinton as you do for those who support President Trump?  You know, consistency.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Cal20sailor

Super Anarchist
13,708
3,932
Detroit
I just turned 60 and have little doubt I could sail circles around most if not all of you.  

I have not been mocked, per se.  Insulted and called all sorts of names - yes.  

Some even suggest I suffer from TDS.  Who might that be?

This from folks who feel the need to defend the current President as if he were fit and qualified to occupy the office and any suggestion otherwise deserves a vigorous opposition.

I was simply trying to find if you reserve the same umbrage for those who support President Trump as you do for those who supported President Clinton.  You know, consistency.
I was in the middle of a long message that Dog (I lick my balls) would have attacked.  BD, teaching school is huge and you have my respect.  

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
Clinton had a boorish affair with a consenting adult.

Trump bragged about being able to sexually assault women with impunity.

Moore sexually assaulted children.

You can't see any moral difference between them?

Really?
Paula Jones, Juanita Broadrick, Kathleen Wiley?

 

Dog

Super Anarchist
37,940
444
I just turned 60 and have little doubt I could sail circles around most if not all of you.  

I was in the middle of a long message that Dog (I lick my balls) would have attacked.  BD, teaching school is huge and you have my respect.  
Agreed...BD not only teaches. He does it in inner city Baltimore...BD walks the walk.

PM me if you want to compare racing resumes.

 

Sean

Super Anarchist
15,448
2,649
Sag Harbor, NY

d'ranger

Super Anarchist
30,185
5,166
Exposing sexual predators is a good thing and long overdue. That Trump and Moore supporters choose to either not believe it or ignore it is troubling. In Trump's case they choose to do so even when he is recorded as stating it. Very troubling.  Smashing your Keurig cofveve maker troubling.

 

d'ranger

Super Anarchist
30,185
5,166
kmacdonald said:
Lumping Moore supporters with Trump supporters is disingenuous and inflammatory.  You lose ALL credibility in doing so.
Given the example I wrote exactly why is that? because you are a butt hurt Trump supporter? Really rich having you write about someone being disingenuous and inflammatory, ironic almost.

 

Nice!

Super Anarchist
4,618
1,397
Victoria, BC
Looks like Dog's elk are running:

From CNN:

Hannity said he was troubled by different answers Moore had given to questions about whether he had dated teenage girls. He also noted that Moore had denied knowing a fifth accuser who had charged the future Senate candidate with sexual assault three decades ago, yet it appeared that Moore had written in the teen's yearbook.

Two Fox News panelists on Hannity's show Monday, Jeanine Pirro and Geraldo Rivera, both said after the emergence of the latest accuser that they could not support Moore.

Also Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal editorial page, another conservative bellwether, wrote that "a famous country song aptly summed up where the Republicans are with Senate candidate Roy Moore in Alabama: You've got to know when to fold 'em."

 
"Mr. Moore's credibility has fallen below the level of survivability," the Journal wrote.
Hannity isn't caving to facts. He doesn't do that. He is responding to all the advertisers who pulled their ads from his show. When it was just Keurig, it was easy to get his sheeple followers to willingly destroy the appliance they had paid for. But when Volvo (among many others) pulled their advertising dollars, it was more difficult to convince them to push their family wagons off a local cliff. The network would have looked at the loss of revenue and then told Hannity to *not* spout bullshit, just this once.

 

Mrleft8

Super Anarchist
28,058
4,349
Suwanee River
Hannity isn't caving to facts. He doesn't do that. He is responding to all the advertisers who pulled their ads from his show. When it was just Keurig, it was easy to get his sheeple followers to willingly destroy the appliance they had paid for. But when Volvo (among many others) pulled their advertising dollars, it was more difficult to convince them to push their family wagons off a local cliff. The network would have looked at the loss of revenue and then told Hannity to *not* spout bullshit, just this once.
There are cliffs in fly-over country?

 

Sean

Super Anarchist
15,448
2,649
Sag Harbor, NY
Not looking good for the Judge 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/15/roy-moore-doug-jones-poll-244937

Republican Roy Moore is trailing Democrat Doug Jones by 12 points in the Alabama special Senate election, according to a poll conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee after five women accused Moore of pursuing them as teenagers.

Jones led Moore 51 to 39 percent, according to the survey taken Sunday and Monday. The NRSC withdrew its support for Moore after the Washington Post published the first allegations against Moore on Thursday, and the group’s chairman, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) said Moore should be expelled from the Senate if he wins on Dec. 12. The poll shows a dramatic turn against Moore in Alabama: In early October, a committee poll had him leading by 16 points, and a survey early this month had him up by 9 points. Moore’s favorability numbers also tanked, from 49 percent in early October to 35 percent in the NRSC’s latest poll.

Several sources who reviewed the poll results said it also tested how Attorney General Jeff Sessions would fare as a write-in candidate, and the results were not favorable. Sessions held the seat for two decades before he joined the Trump administration, and he has been floated as a potential write-in candidate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top