Spatial Ed
Super Anarchist
- 39,527
- 113
Franken admitted to groping Leeann Tweeden so I decided he should resign, but he won't. With Trump there are accusations but I don't find accusations enough to justify resignation. If a convincing case is made by any accuser I will join you in believing he should resign (I already believe he should not have been elected).Mismoyled Jiblet. said:Why should Franken resign but Trump stay in office?
What did Franken admit, exactly?Franken admitted to groping Leeann Tweeden so I decided he should resign, but he won't. With Trump there are accusations but I don't find accusations enough to justify resignation. If a convincing case is made by any accuser I will join you in believing he should resign (I already believe he should not have been elected).
Do you now conveniently believe Bill Clinton should have resigned but didn't at the time? Who was right back then, the people who though his behavior was unacceptable or those circling the wagons?
Oh shit...I've invoked the name of Bill Clinton. Some pussies here think I should not be permitted that line of inquiry because the use by date has expired, or something. Truth is however, they would like Clinton to be out of bounds because they have no good answer for him.
So if Franken had denied the allegation, you wouldn’t call for his resignation?Franken admitted to groping Leeann Tweeden so I decided he should resign, but he won't. With Trump there are accusations but I don't find accusations enough to justify resignation. If a convincing case is made by any accuser I will join you in believing he should resign (I already believe he should not have been elected).
Do you now conveniently believe Bill Clinton should have resigned but didn't at the time? Who was right back then, the people who though his behavior was unacceptable or those circling the wagons?
Oh shit...I've invoked the name of Bill Clinton. Some pussies here think I should not be permitted that line of inquiry because the use by date has expired, or something. Truth is however, they would like Clinton to be out of bounds because they have no good answer for him.
Unless the evidence against him was convincing which in this case it is.So if Franken had denied the allegation, you wouldn’t call for his resignation?
The evidence that trump grabbed women by the pussy is convincing since he was caught on tape boasting about it, and yes, Clinton should have resigned. We’d have had gore instead of Bush in 2000.Unless the evidence against him was convincing which in this case it is.
Do you now believe Clinton should have resigned?
Bill Clinton was a pig and should have been run out of office. Certainly would have been in today's climate. Given your logic, I take it you have no problem with Roy Moore in the Senate and would vote for him if you could.Franken admitted to groping Leeann Tweeden so I decided he should resign, but he won't. With Trump there are accusations but I don't find accusations enough to justify resignation. If a convincing case is made by any accuser I will join you in believing he should resign (I already believe he should not have been elected).
Do you now conveniently believe Bill Clinton should have resigned but didn't at the time? Who was right back then, the people who though his behavior was unacceptable or those circling the wagons?
Oh shit...I've invoked the name of Bill Clinton. Some pussies here think I should not be permitted that line of inquiry because the use by date has expired, or something. Truth is however, they would like Clinton to be out of bounds because they have no good answer for him.
Did you believe Clinton should have resigned at the time?The evidence that trump grabbed women by the pussy is convincing since he was caught on tape boasting about it, and yes, Clinton should have resigned. We’d have had gore instead of Bush in 2000.
Actually yes. But I was a Republican at the time.Did you believe Clinton should have resigned at the time?
I check, he didn’t admit, he apologized. Is that the same?I already did.
4 minutes ago, Sean said:
Bill Clinton was a pig and should have been run out of office. Certainly would have been in today's climate. Given your logic, I take it you have no problem with Roy Moore in the Senate and would vote for him if you could.
Moore's accusers are no more credible than Clinton's.
Did you watch this? It might refresh your memory -
It's good enough for me.I check, he didn’t admit, he apologized. Is that the same?
So trump on tape boasting he can grab them by the pussy because he’s famous, and 16 women come forward and confirm it, what more convincing is needed?Yes I did, if the any one of them can make a convincing case I'm on board.
What exactly did he say?So trump on tape boasting he can grab them by the pussy because he’s famous, and 16 women come forward and confirm it, what more convincing is needed?
Right. No conviction, no crime. Unless "D".Yes I did, if the any one of them can make a convincing case I'm on board.
No, there can be a crime without a conviction. Do you think an accusation is enough to compel a president to resign? (regardless of party affiliation)Right. No conviction, no crime. Unless "D".
by the way, what did Franken confess to? I must have missed your answer.
He said he could grab them by the pussy because when your famous they just let you do it. Heck, instead of me paraphrasing, here’s the transcript.What exactly did he say?