Dog
Super Anarchist
- 37,940
- 444
I am not defending Moore, he's unfit. I exposing Democratic hypocrisy.You are using a logical fallacy called whataboutism to deflect from and defend a pedophile. How can you look yourself in a mirror?
I am not defending Moore, he's unfit. I exposing Democratic hypocrisy.You are using a logical fallacy called whataboutism to deflect from and defend a pedophile. How can you look yourself in a mirror?
You are deflecting from Moore, which is defending him.I am not defending Moore, he's unfit. I exposing Democratic hypocrisy.
HTFUYou are deflecting from Moore, which is defending him.
Defending a pedophile should get you banned from this forum.
Actually, it should get you banned from life.
Says the guy defending a pedophile.HTFU
I don't think he has a reflection.You are using a logical fallacy called whataboutism to deflect from and defend a pedophile. How can you look yourself in a mirror?
Kennedy pleaded guilty and received a sentence. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean he didn't pay the price as legally prescribed to him. Clinton was never charged with a damn thing, and you're still raising pitchforks, dare I say the problem is you?I've pointed out that Democrats elected Kennedy to the senate for 7 terms, that they circled the wagons to protect Clinton all of which means they really have no room to talk. If you have a problem with me citing the Democrat's own record go run to your safe place... poor thing.
Kennedy did what he did and was what he was and Democrats loved him. The lion of the senate, elected 7 times. Paula Jones sued Clinton for sexual harassment and the House charged him with perjury and obstruction of justice arising out of that case.Kennedy pleaded guilty and received a sentence. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean he didn't pay the price as legally prescribed to him. Clinton was never charged with a damn thing, and you're still raising pitchforks, dare I say the problem is you?
The people of Massachusetts saw him worthy of reelection and returned him to the Senate 7 times, the title "Lion of the Senate" was well deserved. Republicans in South Carolina returned Strom Thurmond to the Senate 8 times with all his faults. The Paula Jones case was settled without admitting liability. Why do you have to be reminded that Republicans in the Senate acquitted Clinton of all charges?Kennedy did what he did and was what he was and Democrats loved him. The lion of the senate, elected 7 times. Paula Jones sued Clinton for sexual harassment and the House charged him with perjury and obstruction of justice arising out of that case.
You said "Clinton was never charged with a damn thing".The people of Massachusetts saw him worthy of reelection and returned him to the Senate 7 times, the title "Lion of the Senate" was well deserved. Republicans in South Carolina returned Strom Thurmond to the Senate 8 times with all his faults. The Paula Jones case was settled without admitting liability. Why do you have to be reminded that Republicans in the Senate acquitted Clinton of all charges?
How did that hold up? $100 million in investgation cost and they came up with nothing. You should be ashamed you even brought it up.You said "Clinton was never charged with a damn thing".
So, NOW it’s about how many times he is elected. Nice move of the goalposts.Dude. For how many terms did the Democrats elect Kennedy to the senate. For how many terms has Roy Moore been elected.
That is EXACTLY what Happy Jack claimed his mission was.I am not defending Moore, he's unfit. I exposing Democratic hypocrisy.
So?That is EXACTLY what Happy Jack claimed his mission was.
Exactly.
It was laughable when he said it.
Simple Jack only exposed his own hypocrisy. Hmmm. Speaking of similarities... where did that other Franken thread go?It was laughable when he said it.
Hasn't gotten any better.
Exposing hypocrisy is one thing. Admitting you want to expose the hypocrisy of only one side makes you a partisan shill.
Own it.
I do own it...My commentary is from the right, I don't pretend otherwise. Yours is from the left. Nothing wrong with that.It was laughable when he said it.
Hasn't gotten any better.
Exposing hypocrisy is one thing. Admitting you want to expose the hypocrisy of only one side makes you a partisan shill.
Own it.
The forum wasn't around for democrats to defend Kennedy or Clinton. Why do you say its hypocrisy from the left when you have no evidence our forum members are defending Kennedy or Clinton? But you on the other hand, do demonstrate hypocrisy. It was so apparent in your other thread you had to delete it. Then lie about it. Sad.I've pointed out that Democrats elected Kennedy to the senate for 7 terms, that they circled the wagons to protect Clinton all of which means they really have no room to talk. If you have a problem with me citing the Democrat's own record go run to your safe place... poor thing.
What I said was Democrats elected Kennedy to the senate 7 times and there is pretty good evidence to support that.The forum wasn't around for democrats to defend Kennedy or Clinton. Why do you say its hypocrisy from the left when you have no evidence our forum members are defending Kennedy or Clinton? But you on the other hand, do demonstrate hypocrisy. It was so apparent in your other thread you had to delete it. Then lie about it. Sad.
The question isn’t if Democrats have been historically better. Segregation. Watergate. McCarthy hearings. I don’t have to remind you of our troubled past, you may even remember some of that history.I haven't defended Moore. What I have done is responded to claims that Democrats hold the moral high ground, that the letter behind the name is only a defense in the case of Republicans.