Dog
Super Anarchist
- 37,940
- 444
Nothing at all vague about it. Democrats will vote for their asshole just like Republicans.That sounds sufficiently vague to be worthless. I figured we'd get here eventually. Thanks.
Nothing at all vague about it. Democrats will vote for their asshole just like Republicans.That sounds sufficiently vague to be worthless. I figured we'd get here eventually. Thanks.
That's arguably true. We had a Democratic Mayor here that was once accused of not cleaning up after his dog, yet still voted in. In other words, an asshole. You know... Like Kennedy and Moore.Nothing at all vague about it. Democrats will vote for their asshole just like Republicans.
It’s the problem with religion. He, the Bible has the ten big ones, right? Christian moral equivalency is murder = covet = false gods.Not at all. It just shows you (and most Repubs making statements these days) have no moral sense.
Being a child molester and a rapist is not the same as being guilty of harassment (Clinton) or guilty of having an accident while drunk (Kennedy). All three things are bad but they are in no way close to each other on the scale of how bad they are or how the guilty individual should be treated by society.
-DSK
Hey BD...You were looking for examples of Democrats here believing in their own moral superiority.Not at all. It just shows you (and most Repubs making statements these days) have no moral sense.
Being a child molester and a rapist is not the same as being guilty of harassment (Clinton) or guilty of having an accident while drunk (Kennedy). All three things are bad but they are in no way close to each other on the scale of how bad they are or how the guilty individual should be treated by society.
-DSK
FIFYHey BD...You were looking for examples ofDemocratsbelieving intheir ownmoralssuperiority.
That Steam Flyer is pointing the chasm that exists between these two scenarios is not the same thing as claiming moral superiority.Hey BD...You were looking for examples of Democrats here believing in their own moral superiority.
His accusers are the women who, when they were 14-17 years old, were propositioned (at the very least) or molested (at worst) by Moore when he was in his 30s.His accusers are republicans with no axe to grind against him that reluctantly came forward after being pressured by the press?
Pretty radical eh?Obamacare, minimum wage, late term abortion, immigration....
28 minutes ago, Sean said:
Pretty radical eh?
On Obamacare -
Correct.Please refrain from trying to muddy the conversation with actual positions held by the candidate.
It is far easier to demonize the opposition if you distill their positions down to a few of the talking points you've been given.
You have a problem voting for one of your soul brothers?In both cases it's voting for an asshole.
Accompanied by an adult female he would have been all but invisible to the guards and pretty much everybody else. In the protection of teenage girls from sexual predators they are keyed to single males.Once Former Judge Moore married his wife, was he then allowed back in the mall and to attend HS football games and talk to the cheerleaders? The police officer didn't specify.
Does Moore live in France? Is he subject to French law? Hmmm. Such interesting questions.Hillary said:I guess Moore is a Republican pedophile and the French are just sophisticated bohemians.
It's nice to flexible.
New sock, still same incapability to read. Nicole Belloubet said it was worth consideration and has earned the derision of left wing organisations as a result. The French government actually doesn't have a position on the matter. If they choose to say 13 is a legal age and 'the left' accepts that as OK, feel free to crow about it then.Hillary said:I guess Moore is a Republican pedophile and the French are just sophisticated bohemians.
It's nice to flexible.
still the apologist for a child predator. Sad. Bigly. Many people are saying it.Hillary said:The moral dexterity of the left is the issue; not the law.