Roy Moore 3rd rail?

[Dog]

And if you'll turn to the right, you'll see here a perfect display of how obfuscation, denial, delay, and distraction all work so delightfully to draw our attention from the important matter at hand (Roy Moore's sexual predation of young girls), and to silly little matters like Trump tweets, and White house Christmas decorations.

You mean like when I cited Ted Kennedy to illustrate that Democrats will vote for one of their own assholes too? You would prefer I didn't do shit like that right?

 

[Mrleft8]

You mean like when I cited Ted Kennedy to illustrate that Democrats will vote for one of their own assholes too? You would prefer I didn't do shit like that right?

Right. Because it is not relevant to the conversation. It's like sitting at a dinner table, listening to people discuss their favorite movies, and suddenly interjecting a comment like "My cat's breath smells like cat food". Sure to kill the conversation.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

You mean like when I cited Ted Kennedy to illustrate that Democrats will vote for one of their own assholes too? You would prefer I didn't do shit like that right?

If you were a voter in Alabama, for whom would you vote in the special election?

In other news, Predictit breaking 80/20 for Moore.  Sounds about right.  https://www.predictit.org/Market/3299/Who-will-win-the-2017-US-Senate-special-election-in-Alabama

 

[Dog]

Right. Because it is not relevant to the conversation. It's like sitting at a dinner table, listening to people discuss their favorite movies, and suddenly interjecting a comment like "My cat's breath smells like cat food". Sure to kill the conversation.

But what about in response to a Democrat who makes a derogatory comment about Republican's who support Moore. Would that open the door to pointing out that Democrats are no fucking better? Would that offend your sensibilities?

 

[Mrleft8]

But what about in response to a Democrat who makes a derogatory comment about Republican's who support Moore. Would that open the door to pointing out that Democrats are no fucking better? Would that offend your sensibilities?

You're doing it again.....

 

[Raz'r]

But what about in response to a Democrat who makes a derogatory comment about Republican's who support Moore. Would that open the door to pointing out that Democrats are no fucking better? Would that offend your sensibilities?

In Dog’s world, drunk driving is the same as child molesting. I don’t live in Dog’s world.

 

[Dog]

In Dog’s world, drunk driving is the same as child molesting. I don’t live in Dog’s world.

I never said that, not that that matters to you.

Right now I'm just trying to ascertain what forms of argument are permissible to those of us on the right.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

I never said that, not that that matters to you.

Right now I'm just trying to ascertain what forms of argument are permissible to those of us on the right.

An argument based on positions you take would be a good start.   

If you were a voter in Alabama's special election, for whom would you vote, and why?  

 

[Dog]

An argument based on positions you take would be a good start.   

If you were a voter in Alabama's special election, for whom would you vote, and why?  

Your question was answered o in post 843

Perhaps you can answer the question I posed in 944. It would be helpful to clarify what forms of argument are acceptable for those of us on the right. Thanks.

 

[Raz'r]

I never said that, not that that matters to you.

Right now I'm just trying to ascertain what forms of argument are permissible to those of us on the right.

Just pointing out your “false equivalencies.” It’s clear who you prefer.

 

[Dog]

Just pointing out your “false equivalencies.” It’s clear who you prefer.

There was no false equivalence. Moore and Kennedy have in common that they are both assholes and I simply demonstrated that both parties will support their assholes. 

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Your question was answered o in post 843

Perhaps you can answer the question I posed in 944. It would be helpful to clarify what forms of argument are acceptable for those of us on the right. Thanks.

You have not answered my question, so I will ask it again.  

If you were a voter in Alabama's special election, for whom would you vote, and why?  

I answered your question, but I will repeat it for you.  "An argument based on positions you take would be a good start."  

 

[Dog]

You have not answered my question, so I will ask it again.  

If you were a voter in Alabama's special election, for whom would you vote, and why?  

I answered your question, but I will repeat it for you.  "An argument based on positions you take would be a good start."  

843

And you have not answered my question posed in 944

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

843

And you have not answered my question posed in 944

You can repeat it as many times as you like, but in 843 you said that you would not vote for Jones or Moore.  For whom would you vote?  

You asked "what forms of argument are permissible to those of us on the right."  My answer is "an argument based on positions you take" is permissible, though I dispute that you are on the right, because you do not take a position, you just waffle and deflect.  

 

[Raz'r]

There was no false equivalence. Moore and Kennedy have in common that they are both assholes and I simply demonstrated that both parties will support their assholes. 

In my world, child molesters are further down the asshole line than drunk drivers.  Good to know your view is that R child molesters = D drunk drivers.

You ever drive when you shouldn't?

I won't even ask the other part of that question.

 

[Raz'r]

BTW - I think the deplorables will gladly vote Roy in.

And the senate will cave.

Just like they are about to on the tax fuckery package.

 

[SloopJonB]

But what about in response to a Democrat who makes a derogatory comment about Republican's who support Moore. Would that open the door to pointing out that Democrats are no fucking better? Would that offend your sensibilities?

You misunderstand - it's YOU who offends everyone's sensibilities.

 

[SloopJonB]

what forms of argument are acceptable for those of us on the right. Thanks.

Ones that demonstrate at least a modicum of intelligence.

 

[Steam Flyer]

what forms of argument are acceptable for those of us on the right. Thanks.

Ones that demonstrate at least a modicum of intelligence.

Ones with some small amount of fact thrown in would be nice, too.

-DSK

 

[Clove Hitch]

There was no false equivalence. Moore and Kennedy have in common that they are both assholes and I simply demonstrated that both parties will support their assholes. 

Talk about a Doggy-dog world.  

Pedophile = drunk driver