We know who supports child molestors. Pretty fucking disgusting.The dems supported murders , bigots, racosts and liars. What is the problem?
We know who supports child molestors. Pretty fucking disgusting.The dems supported murders , bigots, racosts and liars. What is the problem?
Ted Danson, Benny Hill, Barry White?Ted, Hill, Barry.
I suspect he played a lot of football without a helmet.Were you born congenitally stupid, or did your mom potty train you with a tack hammer?
Classic.:lol:You sir are am idiot
Nope- here’s Scalia:You might want to change that to Thomas, since Scalia didn't join that part of his opinion in Greece v Galloway
I'm a fan of Thomas' opinions on various subjects but not that one. Mainly because Pennsylvania.
We had state religions in the founding era.
YCMTSU.Classic.You sir are am idiot
I have no idea what you are on about.@B.J. Porter: Aw, you know I have something to say about science (but not too much). @Editor has been trying to teach me my place in these Forums. He's not done too well.
Interesting admonition. I've never started to read one without finishing. Though it took quite a while with the Citizens United mess.Nope- here’s Scalia:You might want to change that to Thomas, since Scalia didn't join that part of his opinion in Greece v Galloway
I'm a fan of Thomas' opinions on various subjects but not that one. Mainly because Pennsylvania.
We had state religions in the founding era.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-1014.ZD.html
read the whole thing-
Contrast with the article I linked:Thus, while I have no quarrel with the Court's general proposition that the Establishment Clause "guarantees that government may not coerce anyone to support or participate in religion or its exercise," ante, at 8, I see no warrant for expanding the concept of coercion beyond acts backed by threat of penalty — a brand of coercion that, happily, is readily discernible to those of us who have made a career of reading the disciples of Blackstone rather than of Freud.
I'm convinced by the mixed evidence that didn't convince Thomas. So was Scalia, or he would have joined part 1 of Thomas' opinion.According to Thomas (and this is not new—he’s taken this position before), the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause applies only to the U.S. Congress (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”)—meaning it applies only to the federal government. Pointing to the fact that some states did have established religions at the time the Constitution was ratified, and that some did not disestablish their religions until decades later (Massachusetts did not disestablish its state religion until 1833), Thomas—with clever wordplay—says the First Amendment is “simply agnostic on the subject of state establishments.” Thomas notes that it’s possible the Establishment Clause took on a different meaning through Reconstruction and the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in the 1860s. But he says the historical evidence for such an argument is “mixed,” and he’s not convinced.
For some reasonInteresting admonition. I've never started to read one without finishing. Though it took quite a while with the Citizens United mess.
Scalia doesn't go as far as Thomas, which is probably why he didn't join the opinion I noted.
Contrast with the article I linked:
I'm convinced by the mixed evidence that didn't convince Thomas. So was Scalia, or he would have joined part 1 of Thomas' opinion.
Just saying, if you're going to pick on a Justice over this issue, pick on Thomas. His views are more extreme and he's still alive and on the court.
What's to cooperate with?The island did not cooperate. Local politics.
https://www.snopes.com/puerto-rico-teamsters/Really. Local teamster union stopped driving trucks moths ago. Supplies rotted on the docks. But, imagine your own reality.
Don't confuse him with facts, his mind's made up.
80% of the teamsters didn't show for work.What's to cooperate with?
http://forums.sailinganarchy.com/index.php?/topic/194592-roy-moore-3rd-rail/&do=findComment&comment=602380880% of the teamsters didn't show for work.
Don't confuse him with facts, his mind's made up.
Do you read anything besides Infowars and Brightfart?80% of the teamsters didn't show for work.