Russia, Russia, Russia

badlatitude

Super Anarchist
32,407
6,541
I should have used purple. Provision for challenging the results of an election is integral to the system and making use of it, even by Republicans, is not treason.
I understand what you are saying, but at what point does it become antithetical? After 13 federal lawsuits, all conclusively say that you were wrong, and no new evidence is forthcoming. I would never consider treason in that context, but fraud must be there somewhere.
 

Sol Rosenberg

Girthy Member
96,114
13,243
Earth
Moreso the RWNJ's get a hit of dopamine in their brains everytime someone here responds to their nutjob bullshit. If one stops recognizing them, they will cease to spew shit, but many cannot help themselves and support their neverending shit-spewing.....
People raised by bullshitters to be bullshitters will grow up to be bullshitters. And there will always be people who hate Americans, even Americans who hate their fellow Americans. Giving them your time is voluntary.
 

Ishmael

55,705
14,498
Fuctifino
People raised by bullshitters to be bullshitters will grow up to be bullshitters. And there will always be people who hate Americans, even Americans who hate their fellow Americans. Giving them your time is voluntary.
For some here, it seems to be involuntary, in the sense of knee-jerk response. Because if they thought about it, and acted on that thought, they would realize they are the ones being played.
 

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
This too. We all get to choose how we invest our time.
Not long ago, there were folks here who were insisting others observed their "Ignore" list. Seems unreasonably selfish, to me. Besides, how do we compile the list of who needs to be on it? One poster says so, or a critical mass is needed.

Folks could also learn to scroll by the posts of people with whom they are not interested in interacting. I have no one on my "Ignore" list, but there are several I just zip by.
 

phillysailor

Super Anarchist
9,275
4,042
Let's be clear here.
Huh. Your quote left out that the president was responsible for lying to the mob?

The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the PRESIDENT and other powerful people.

I am just trying to be accurate and non-partisan.
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,950
598
In what way(s) did these Democrats "conspire" to "defraud"?

Those are serious allegations, and you should not be leveling them without evidence.
You used those words to implicate Republicans when I raised the issue of challenging election results. I thought it was a bit over the top, so I turned them around and sent them back.
 

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
You used those words to implicate Republicans when I raised the issue of challenging election results. I thought it was a bit over the top, so I turned them around and sent them back.
Um, no. Philly used those words (Post #227) and you then tried to claim it was also done by Democrats.

Of course, you are unable to produce any evidence the Democrats you listed “conspired to defraud the nation by changing the results of the election".

Is it hyperbole or bullshit?
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,950
598
Um, no. Philly used those words (Post #227) and you then tried to claim it was also done by Democrats.

Of course, you are unable to produce any evidence the Democrats you listed “conspired to defraud the nation by changing the results of the election".

Is it hyperbole or bullshit?
Un, no. In 225 I asked the question "When did objecting to the certification of an election become a problem?"
 

Bus Driver

Bacon Quality Control Specialist
Un, no. In 225 I asked the question "When did objecting to the certification of an election become a problem?"
Yep. And, Philly was clear the actions of the crowd went way beyond "objecting".

The actions detailed make clear the defeated ex-President tried to overthrow an election. That brings up "defraud".

And, he had a lot of people willing to participate. That would bring in "conspired".

At least you've dropped that line of bullshit that Democrats did it, too. Now, you are busy trying to flood the zone with shit.

You really have no moral compass, do you? What happened to you?
 

Dog 2.0

Super Anarchist
3,950
598
Yep. And, Philly was clear the actions of the crowd went way beyond "objecting".

The actions detailed make clear the defeated ex-President tried to overthrow an election. That brings up "defraud".

And, he had a lot of people willing to participate. That would bring in "conspired".

At least you've dropped that line of bullshit that Democrats did it, too. Now, you are busy trying to flood the zone with shit.

You really have no moral compass, do you? What happened to you?
My post makes it clear what I was talking about.
 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
46,613
10,847
Eastern NC
My post makes it clear what I was talking about.

Yes, falsely accusing Democrats who objected to the certification of an election, completely within the existing legal framework, of conspiring to overturn that election by a variety of frauds.

Like some Republicans did.
 


Latest posts





Top