Sailing to the Nord Stream Pipeline on the Q-T.

Leeroy Jenkins

Super Anarchist
1,819
761
Vancouver
if they can afford the dive gear and the explosives, they can afford to charter a nicer fishing boat. I've seen these fuckers all over the place up in those parts for years.

View attachment 581638
Fuck those are ugly. I've only seen one that looked sort of okay.
20230212_083147.jpg
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
Fuck those are ugly. I've only seen one that looked sort of okay.

That is sorta special ops tactical convertible version, yes?

Or so called "black carbon edition"?

I always find the XOs from the same designer a bit more pleasing to eye, and they are black without burning, but those are not the best looking boats either for sure.
 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,459
1,008
quivira regnum
Why don't you then correct us and tell how to differentiate an earthquake from man made explosion, you being the expert?

Is seismology a special kind of signal processing where you cannot do a FFT or other DSP operations for example in order to produce a characteristic signature? Can you not train and use ML to categorize the events?

Not that details are the point here, but it is always nice to learn new things, yes?



What is the main crucial difference between a sailboat and fishing boat here that makes all the difference?

And where do you need those 200+ gas bottles, can you remind us?

the fact that you simply carry on with your bullshit is kind of curious - tbh.
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
the fact that you simply carry on with your bullshit is kind of curious - tbh.

So nothing to correct on the seismology front you have background on?

Can at least you point the central BS you would want corrected, you being the expert, yes?

Surely there must be something to point, other than the clever "everythin is BS" aka the "fake news" argument?
 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,459
1,008
quivira regnum
so, you are nothing but a troll?

in fact, I reported from 70 to 200 bottles, and not my calculation. but 200 (I presume) being required for in water deco - multiple dives, with multiple divers, on multiple sites. but the more and more ridiculous posts you make seem to assert all these sport divers need to do is casually "deliver the package".

again. the best-informed analysis I've seen points to likely implementation by submersible. the explosions simply too large. the bombs too big. sport diving not required. so no need to spoil a good time aboard a pleasure boat - with hard work.

Ultimate false flag would be to make it appear it exploded from the inside, which it did not, yes?
strange. you seem to suggest russia not behind a false flag - which I presume everybody else takes for granted. they are, after all, the masters of deceit. hmm.
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
so, you are nothing but a troll?

You sure behave like one, but anyway...

strange. you seem to suggest russia not behind a false flag - which I presume everybody else takes for granted. they are, after all, the masters of deceit. hmm.

I don't speculate on who is behind this, but in my books a master of deceit is the one not getting caught.

Like Stuxnet or Azorian, and likes.
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
in fact, I reported from 70 to 200 bottles, and not my calculation. but 200 (I presume) being required for in water deco - multiple dives, with multiple divers, on multiple sites. but the more and more ridiculous posts you make seem to assert all these sport divers need to do is casually "deliver the package".

No one in their clear mind would attempt this on OC - and if they did they would bring a compressor.

And how does one end up with 10-25 tanks per dive needed? Thats a gas change every 3 meters?

Why so many? And what gasses?

again. the best-informed analysis I've seen points to likely implementation by submersible.

An option, yes, but not necessary.

And using submersible rules out the ruskies, yes?

the explosions simply too large. the bombs too big. sport diving not required. so no need to spoil a good time aboard a pleasure boat - with hard work.

Ok, you being a seismology expert can you tell me again:

1) a size of bomb causing documented M2.1 explosion

2) size too big for a diver with a lift bag

An order of magnitude is enough.

Please correct this, as we have it all wrong.
 
Last edited:

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
again. the best-informed analysis I've seen points to likely implementation by submersible. the explosions simply too large. the bombs too big.

Your expert source for this has come to surface:

“Such an explosion, so powerful and at such depth, could only be conducted by experts backed by the entire potential of a state that has relevant technologies,”


So we all have to agree with such respectable source, yes?
 

MR.CLEAN

Moderator
So nothing to correct on the seismology front you have background on?

Can at least you point the central BS you would want corrected, you being the expert, yes?

Surely there must be something to point, other than the clever "everythin is BS" aka the "fake news" argument?
You're starting to sound like the scandi Mike Wofsey
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
and there you have it folks - this character noano may not be playing for the team you think he is.

But you are, quoting our favorite Vladimir almost word by word?

Have any substance on the issue on hand, or is just name calling mode now?
 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,459
1,008
quivira regnum
that you again. troll?

likely every other word you've posted here an utter lie. bullshit to promote your personal anti-western conspiracy theory. sail much. do you? what horseshit.

please just fuck right off.
 

noaano

Anarchist
722
363
that you again. troll?

Speak for yourself.

likely every other word you've posted here an utter lie. bullshit to promote your personal anti-western conspiracy theory. sail much. do you? what horseshit.

That makes it only half lie, which is still quite a bit more substance than you can output on a good day.

Still waiting for your resident-expert-on-seismology corrections, but I guess you were not seismologist after all, right?

please just fuck right off.

Can't you do any better than that?

Try at least.
 

Parma

Super Anarchist
3,136
462
here
Anybody who thinks about it for even a second realizes it was the Mexicans who were behind the whole thing.

I mean, it's obvious.
 

Se7en

Super Anarchist
1,647
732
Melbourne
so, you are nothing but a troll?

in fact, I reported from 70 to 200 bottles, and not my calculation. but 200 (I presume) being required for in water deco - multiple dives, with multiple divers, on multiple sites. but the more and more ridiculous posts you make seem to assert all these sport divers need to do is casually "deliver the package".
I only know about the diving side of it.
What is required that needs multiple divers for multiple dives? Why isn't it as easy as "deliver the package"?
It's just an interesting logistical exercise to see if it is possible from a 50ft yacht. The diving side definately is, but the rest of it might make it unfeasible.
 

Se7en

Super Anarchist
1,647
732
Melbourne
This is Richard Harris diving at 245 meters.

Can you point out the 200+ gas bottles required in the pic:
Craig and Harry have a lot of support to enable these deep dives in the Pearse.
They use a habitat for decompression for instance. and staged tanks in the cave. None of which is practical for open water.
 


Latest posts





Top