Sailing to the Nord Stream Pipeline on the Q-T.

Panoramix

Super Anarchist
you are a good reader. but it's also useful to consult your common sense. there were three blasts. at least one of which measured 2.3 on the Richter scale.

further. that a 50 foot party boat - could carry 5 or 6 commandos plus dive gear sufficient to descend to 80m and successfully plant the tons of explosive required. defies belief! I mean, is there even any room left over for beer at that point?

it's all a big joke. and of all the pages in the world discussing it - this one should be the first on board to laugh right along with it.
2.3 on the richter scale may have measured the Depressurization of the pipe...

Sure I don't have a clue how they did it, once you consider that the Brits managed to sink Germans ships with canoe during WW2, I think that the Bavaria story is believable. Aith a 50 feet sailboat, they had a payload of several tons plus they are pros who know what they are doing... I know for sure that during the 90s French commandos were "delivered" to some operation fields via submarine and in an inflatable. These guys are terribly tough, disciplined and trained... or anyway I would not have messed up with one of them during my national service in the navy!
 

Lifted Tack

Super Anarchist
1,151
74
What happened to the idea that pigs loaded with explosives and a timing device were sent down the pipelines? That always seemed the most likely scenario.
 

Lifted Tack

Super Anarchist
1,151
74
One explosive charge failed to detonate

They have this explosive but will not release the documentation
The explosive charges were 1000 lbs

Industrial size weight

Only a state actor could handle and set in deep water times 4 explosives

Not a baveria sailboat job
Got a cite for that?
 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,446
1,002
quivira regnum
Aith a 50 feet sailboat, they had a payload of several tons plus they are pros who know what they are doing.
yes, the pros know what they are doing.

I have done working dives to 100m. using scuba.
Very little bottom time, very little visibility, fucking tanks all over you.

I am very skeptical to the point of disbelief that they could also take down and plant 500 kgs of anything in 80 m. using scuba and exiting to a sailboat with no chamber around.
 
Last edited:

Panoramix

Super Anarchist
yes, experts know what they are doing.
May be there were no scuba divers involved... Or may be the divers just marked the location! 30 years ago, I was on a mine sweeper, we were using tethered diving robots that were already old technology to deal with mines. In 2022 may be there is a miniature version of it, also 500kg of explosive in the water is not that heavy, they could have for instance controlled the descent along a rope...
 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,446
1,002
quivira regnum
fyi. the 'leaked intel' said nothing about sophisticated equipment. rather, just the opposite.

making it up as you go along is also kind of a thing in 'big' science. if your theory doesn't prove correct the first time. just change it to fit the new data.

..repeat
 

billsreef

Anarchist
1,345
799
Miami
One explosive charge failed to detonate

They have this explosive but will not release the documentation
The explosive charges were 1000 lbs

Industrial size weight

Only a state actor could handle and set in deep water times 4 explosives

Not a baveria sailboat job
Just need a commercial fishing vessel. 1000lbs is easy, and also going to have a very good quality sonar.
 
I have only brought things up from depth, so we were diving fairly light to attach lifting gear.
I could not imagine trying to set something bulky down in a precise location 80m down.

Even with the military deco tables that allow for 'acceptable losses' it would still be a very short bottom time and a very long, around 2 hours, deco schedule.
You can skip in water deco, if you have a deco chamber at the surface.

There is no part of this scuba divers on a sailboat story that I can get my head around.
 

slug zitski

Super Anarchist
7,495
1,624
worldwide
I have only brought things up from depth, so we were diving fairly light to attach lifting gear.
I could not imagine trying to set something bulky down in a precise location 80m down.

Even with the military deco tables that allow for 'acceptable losses' it would still be a very short bottom time and a very long, around 2 hours, deco schedule.
You can skip in water deco, if you have a deco chamber at the surface.

There is no part of this scuba divers on a sailboat story that I can get my head around.
Evidently the specialist divers were breathing helium or some special mix for deep work
 

billsreef

Anarchist
1,345
799
Miami
You need well equipped divers

Probably some kinda underwater propulsion device

Cables work well. There are also things called ROV's that would work for precision placement. Divers not required.

Evidently the specialist divers were breathing helium or some special mix for deep work
Still requires significant decompression time that is not practicle without a deco chamber handy and at depth for entry to avoid getting bent when surfacing.
 
"Nobody could have known a sailboat might be used for terrorism…when does TSA set up a checkpoint at the marina gate?"

.....except..... the Froggies did it to the Rainbow Warrior....
 

EYESAILOR

Super Anarchist
3,799
2,312
The very fact that there are a thousand theories and that nobody has any answers is a measure of how successful this mission was.

10 years from now a little girl will be stroking her fathers uniform and will ask
"What's this medal for Daddy?" and he will answer
"Honey, that's the medal for Don't ask and I wont tell"

The question is, will they be speaking English with an American accent?
Ukrainian?
Russian?
Norwegian?
Danish?
Latvian?

Whoever they are, if they wanted to use a Bavaria 40 in the mission, I respect their choices.
 


Latest posts





Top