Snaggletooth
SA's Morrelle Compasse
- 34,905
- 5,954
Thast a sweetey!
Thast a sweetey!
Warm and fuzzies? Single outboard is still safer than flying in a single engine airplane. Have you ever had one quit?One outboard for the efficiency, two for the warm and fuzzies (depending on your playground and conditions you’ll be in)
Actually I have twice been in a small plane when the engine stopped. I am not a pilot. Both times the pilot managed to get the engine restarted.Warm and fuzzies? Single outboard is still safer than flying in a single engine airplane. Have you ever had one quit?
I think I had about 90% of your reply correct in my mind when I wrote thatWarm and fuzzies? Single outboard is still safer than flying in a single engine airplane. Have you ever had one quit?
Pictures of the 23 please!It just seems like so much more weight and expense and complexity to design for twin engines, not to mention the fuel burn. I'd rather carry a tiny "get home" motor. I'd like to know how Totoro handles with one engine kicked up.
I like what Aspen has done with their single engined asymmetrical power cats. I have seen one going by and was struck by how clean the wake was for a big power cat.
The photo is of the wake of my new 23 footer at 18 knots
View attachment 479153
I had sketched up aa power outrigger as a concept 20 years ago. That really is a cool way to go. It gets the motor inline and better propulsive numbers with a larger screw and single engine.It just seems like so much more weight and expense and complexity to design for twin engines, not to mention the fuel burn. I'd rather carry a tiny "get home" motor. I'd like to know how Totoro handles with one engine kicked up.
I like what Aspen has done with their single engined asymmetrical power cats. I have seen one going by and was struck by how clean the wake was for a big power cat.
The photo is of the wake of my new 23 footer at 18 knots
View attachment 479153
That’s unfortunate and subject to diminishing returns (and is really silly).I had sketched up aa power outrigger as a concept 20 years ago. That really is a cool way to go. It gets the motor inline and better propulsive numbers with a larger screw and single engine.
However in the current paradigm, 2 engines is hardly "extra expense." The twin engine motorboat is a thing of the past Even the triple is becoming endangered. The Quad and the Quint are ascendent. There are even sextets in production. I've seen proposals for 4 Sevens at the stern That is 4 x 627 hp. Now the new Sevens will be over 1000 hp each.
I totally agree, its a trade off with high costs, but everyone has different uses and priorities (as shown in the wide array of "sailors power boats" in this thread). Steering like a tank, turning in its own length can be really nice tooIt just seems like so much more weight and expense and complexity to design for twin engines, not to mention the fuel burn. I'd rather carry a tiny "get home" motor. I'd like to know how Totoro handles with one engine kicked up.
I like what Aspen has done with their single engined asymmetrical power cats. I have seen one going by and was struck by how clean the wake was for a big power cat.
The photo is of the wake of my new 23 footer at 18 knots
View attachment 479153
The link in my post goes to when the boat went from a single Tohatsu 9.8 to twins.Just put a bunch of hours on my new Suzuki 20. It burns less fuel than I was expecting. Still need to total up my hours and fill-ups, but I think it's well under 1 gallon per hour at around 5000 rpm (tops out at 5800).I sold the Sun Cat a while back and am now a Picnic Cat guy.
It's not my Cowmaran, though I'm jockeying for third in line to inherit it. Or maybe fourth, I don't know. It's getting a pair of new 20 hp Suzuki's this week.
Seem like a really nice motor.
Why a pair of them instead of one?
Yes, twice recently. The 150 Suzuki on my Twin Vee 22 just died when I shifted back to neutral after backing away from the boat ramp recently. I replaced all three of its fuel filters just to get people to stop telling me it's bad fuel and the problem persisted. A pro figured out it was something called an HPV valve or something. My brother said it stood for "high priced valve." $400 plus labor, so pretty accurate.Warm and fuzzies? Single outboard is still safer than flying in a single engine airplane. Have you ever had one quit?
Depends on the boat. That's about the slowest my Twin Vee will plane. It likes to go 20 knots. It doesn't really like any other speed.As the very talented Paul Bieker has pointed out, the sweet spot for a planning motorboat is 16 knots +/-.
Even my garvey runs best at 16 knots.That’s unfortunate and subject to diminishing returns (and is really silly).
As the very talented Paul Bieker has pointed out, the sweet spot for a planning motorboat is 16 knots +/-.
After crossing Puget Sound more than 7000 times during my commuting years in a variety of small motorboats, I came to believe that I had completely tested Paul’s theory and it held up very well.
And 16 knots +/- is smoother, quieter, more economical, easier to dodge floating obstacles, and just down right better (IMHO.)
As always, YMMV
(The biggest complaint I have for the Goetz 60’er is that they put too much HP aboard. My Tim Kernan designed 50’er (At 22,200#) is delightful at 16 knots +/- which leaves lots of reserve in my twin 200hp diesels.)
Of course I am way more laid back now that I am retired.
Well Kim, when/if I get my 48’ powercat and you get Bob’s boat, we’ll have some interesting learnings given that they’ll both be about the same displacement…If I ever get around to building Bob’s 60’er with the single diesel it will be interesting to see her wake at 16 knots. 60x10.72 x 15,264#
She will be in the transition or semiplaning regime at her max bow up trim but be8ng lean and light she wont trim all that much. Her chines will prbably remain wet unless you engage tabs.If I ever get around to building Bob’s 60’er with the single diesel it will be interesting to see her wake at 16 knots. 60x10.72 x 15,264#
My Kernan motorboat does not seem to do any “bow up” running as she gets to planing, she just rises up level and we can see when we are on plane when her wake calms down. Narrow boats really like to slip through the water. (No tabs on the Kernan, and she doesn’t seem to need them.)She will be in the transition or semiplaning regime at her max bow up trim but be8ng lean and light she wont trim all that much. Her chines will prbably remain wet unless you engage tabs.
That would be cool…..Well Kim, when/if I get my 48’ powercat and you get Bob’s boat, we’ll have some interesting learnings given that they’ll both be about the same displacement…