Olsonist
Disgusting Liberal Elitist
I believe them when they say he was not an extremist.
But you'll believe a drunk murderer with a DUI prior who says something convenient before that.
I believe them when they say he was not an extremist.
How about Cayler Ellington? Not likely, he's the 18-year-old kid that Brandt ran down and killed with his SUV because he was a Republican (read, semi-fascist).
Brandt is now out on bail.
How about Heather Heyer, ever heard of her, of course you have.
Yep. And, shortly after that, the accuracy of that claim was called into question.Mr Bus Driver, that’s what the defendant said prior to the act.
Why post anything in this place without trying to score political points?that’s it’s purpose.Yep. And, shortly after that, the accuracy of that claim was called into question.
That didn't stop Dog Deux from trying to score political points with a dubious claim.
In typical fashion, this thread became yet another "own goal" in a long list of them.
Only because that's why he said he did it.
Fixed it for youDog Deux started this thread, repeating the claim of the Perpetrator, on Saturday.
Two days earlier, the claim of the driver was called into question.
Why doesn't Dog Deux verify the facts before posting?
Never really been a fan of folks taking it upon themselves to edit other people's posts.Fixed it for you
Sorry, but it had to be said.Never really been a fan of folks taking it upon themselves to edit other people's posts.
Seems a lot like the Joker. Start a thread, have his ass handed to him....Dog Deux started this thread, repeating the claim of the driver, on Saturday.
Two days earlier, the claim of the driver was called into question.
Why doesn't Dog Deux verify the facts before posting?
Dog deaux maintains that the FBI were really going after Hillary emails in Trumps basement.Coming soon to a thread near you:
"Dog Deaux maintains that Trump's classified document trial was a conspiracy. The former president is innocent of all charges".
But there is the 911 recording itself. When a suspect admits his motivation that's evidence.Investigators say none of the witnesses they have interviewed support the idea that there was a political argument before authorities say Shannon Brandt struck Cayler Ellingson with his vehicle on Sept. 18 in McHenry, and a family friend who knew the teen said he wasn't active in politics.
“I can’t get into details about what the witnesses are describing to us. But what I can tell you is that this is not political in nature at all,” he said, adding: “There is no evidence to support Brandt’s claim on the 911 call that Mr. Ellingson was a Republican extremist. There is no evidence to support that all through our continued investigation.”
![]()
Little evidence of political argument before teen's death
There is little indication that an 18-year-old who died after being struck by an SUV in North Dakota was a political extremist like the driver claimedabcnews.go.com
Post #48But there is the 911 recording itself. When a suspect admits his motivation that's evidence.
A lack of corroborating evidence is not a lack of evidence. The suspect said why he did it.Dog Deux started this thread, repeating the claim of the driver, on Saturday.
Two days earlier, the claim of the driver was called into question.
Why doesn't Dog Deux verify the facts before posting?