Shannon Brandt, ring any bells?

[Dog 2.0]

We have a self-serving statement from a guy who killed someone.

What we don't have is any evidence to corroborate that statement.

But, you be you and try to make it a political act, just like Mr. Brandt.

I look forward to Mr. Brandt's trial. I am sure he will be able to provide evidence to corroborate his claim. By then, you will have vanished from this thread and be off into other bullshit arguments.

Who should we believe wrt Brandt's motivation, Brandt or you?

 

[Olsonist]

The po po didn’t believe your boy Brandt.

 

[Bus Driver]

Who should we believe wrt Brandt's motivation, Brandt or you?

Still no corroborating evidence to support his claim? Yep. None. None, whatsoever.

Admit it, you saw a story and thought you could score some political points for your team because someone told a story they killed another human because "he was a Republican". As the story has been investigated, we find nothing other than the statement of the killer to support.......the statement of the killer. You just can't admit you stepped on a metaphoric rake.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Still no corroborating evidence to support his claim? Yep. None. None, whatsoever.

Admit it, you saw a story and thought you could score some political points for your team because someone told a story they killed another human because "he was a Republican". As the story has been investigated, we find nothing other than the statement of the killer to support.......the statement of the killer. You just can't admit you stepped on a metaphoric rake.

Still no evidence at all for yours.

 

[Deleted member 149385]

Still no corroborating evidence to support his claim? Yep. None. None, whatsoever.

Admit it, you saw a story and thought you could score some political points for your team because someone told a story they killed another human because "he was a Republican". As the story has been investigated, we find nothing other than the statement of the killer to support.......the statement of the killer. You just can't admit you stepped on a metaphoric rake.

What other evidence could there be except for the assailant’s own words?

 

[Bus Driver]

What other evidence could there be except for the assailant’s own words?

You're kidding, right?

I suppose you've never heard of things like witnesses? You know, other people who could say "Yes. Mr. Brandt is telling the truth."

In this case, we have none of those. None. In fact, we have nothing more than the word of the killer. Should we go with that?

 

[Fakenews]

I killed some type of bug yesterday. I’m pretty sure it was an extremist Republican. Not sorry about it.

 

[Deleted member 149385]

Is the question that he did it or is the question why? He’s admitted to it, he also said why. What more do you want? Witnesses that saw him run someone over? I don’t understand you on this. You’re being dogmatic I think.

 

[Bus Driver]

Is the question that he did it or is the question why? He’s admitted to it, he also said why. What more do you want? Witnesses that saw him run someone over? I don’t understand you on this. You’re being dogmatic I think.

Dog Deux started this thread with the claim the man was killed "because he was a Republican". By the time he started the thread, that claim had been examined and law enforcement stated there was no evidence to support Mr. Brandt's claim. Dog Deux is trying to stir shit.

He has been asked for evidence to corroborate the claim. He cites Mr. Brandt's claim as evidence to support Mr. Brandt's claim.

I trust you see the absurdity in that (absence of) logic.

 

[Deleted member 149385]

Dog Deux started this thread with the claim the man was killed "because he was a Republican". By the time he started the thread, that claim had been examined and law enforcement stated there was no evidence to support Mr. Brandt's claim. Dog Deux is trying to stir shit.

He has been asked for evidence to corroborate the claim. He cites Mr. Brandt's claim as evidence to support Mr. Brandt's claim.

I trust you see the absurdity in that (absence of) logic.

So a confession is not a confession?

 

[Deleted member 149385]

I ‘get’ his argument, I don’t get yours.

 

[Bus Driver]

So a confession is not a confession?

It's not a question of his guilt.

Mr. Brandt wants us to believe he was being targeted by a "Republican extremist" as a defense for what he did.

In a state that provides cover by means of "Stand your ground laws", that becomes pretty damned important to verify.

Do you feel the claim by the killer is enough? Me? I'd like some corroboration before I give it credence.

 

[Deleted member 149385]

It's not a question of his guilt.

Mr. Brandt wants us to believe he was being targeted by a "Republican extremist" as a defense for what he did.

In a state that provides cover by means of "Stand your ground laws", that becomes pretty damned important to verify.

Do you feel the claim by the killer is enough? Me? I'd like some corroboration before I give it credence.

Of course I do. But the assailant committed the crime, standing your ground in a car doesn’t make any sense because he could have just as easily driven off. If that’s his defense I’d be looking for a better attorney.

 

[Bus Driver]

Of course I do. But the assailant committed the crime, standing your ground in a car doesn’t make any sense because he could have just as easily driven off. If that’s his defense I’d be looking for a better attorney.

Go back and read the OP. Dog Deux is trying to claim some sort of victimhood for a Republican being run down, "because he was a Republican".

He invoked Heather Heyer to suggest the media is not being open about reporting this as political murder.

It was a bullshit attempt to use a tragedy to score a cheap political point.

 

[Raz'r]

Who should we believe wrt Brandt's motivation, Brandt or you?

So, you believe Brandt should be able to claim SYG?

 

[Deleted member 149385]

Someone dying is not a cheap political point. Let me guess, you think these are mostly peaceful protest…

 

[Bus Driver]

Someone dying is not a cheap political point. Let me guess, you think these are mostly peaceful protest…

Someone's death should not be used to score political points. I agree.

You should take that up with the guy who started the thread.

 

[βhyde]

Why do we need more evidence than the perp's admission and the dead kid?

Remember when the Son of Sam (David Berkowitz) admitted that a dog told him to commit murder? That's why.

 

[Raz'r]

Remember when the Son of Sam (David Berkowitz) admitted that a dog told him to commit murder? That's why.

No one believed it because it was a black lab. Had it been a ShihTzu or Chihuahua, well...

 

[Mike in Seattle]

MCHENRY, N.D. (Valley News Live) - Foster County State’s Attorney Kara Brinster has moved to dismiss the charges of Criminal Vehicular Homicide and Duty in Accident Involving Death or Injury against 41-year-old Shannon Brandt. The state has filed new criminal charges against Brandt, including Murder (AA Felony) and Duty in Accident Involving Death or Injury (B Felony).

Charges upgraded to murder in fatal hit-and-run crash

The state has filed new criminal charges against Brandt, including Murder (AA Felony) and Duty in Accident Involving Death or Injury (B Felony).

www.valleynewslive.com