Smart Alternator/controller

Kenny Dumas

Non Binary About Anything
1,406
574
PDX
Just got a pair of these to go with the two I’ve been running for a couple years $1100 for the pair

69ED74CC-D837-4E85-8BBB-6E9D7B2A45C4.jpeg

 

zenmasterfred

Super Anarchist
1,561
565
Lopez Island
Great, more for my senior brain to obsess about.   :wub:   Thanks for the input, I'll take a look.  Still thinking about to keep with KISS, keep it simple stupid!

 

jzk

Super Anarchist
13,025
483
I was thinking of adding a couple 250 Amp JS Alternators and using the Mastervolt Alpha Pro III regulator to control them. They will charge 900ah of LiFePO4 batteries. I will need a serpentine pulley conversion kit. Engines are 4JH4E.
 

elite_killerX

New member
1
3
the P is for phosphate
Not in LiPo. LiPo stands for Lithium-Polymer, which is probably the most dangerous lithium chemistry out there. Used in applications where light weight and performance are more important than safety, like RC planes and helicopters.

Phosphate is used in Lithium-Iron-Phosphate batteries, LiFePO4 or LFP for short. These are the safest lithiums out there, and are the ones we use in boats.

Don't mix the terms, they are important.
 

solosailor

Super Anarchist
4,328
1,023
San Francisco Bay
For those with or considering a Renogy type "sealed" battery with internal BMS be very aware of their limitations. Those internal BMS units usually can only handle 50A-100A of charging. Lets say you have a couple in parallel and one of the BMS units fail (there are many points of BMS failure) then the remaining battery is taking the whole charge load and will also shut itself off along with your entire boats DC system..... AND since the BMS is not talking to the alternator to turn it off you can burn it out as well (a surge device can help protect it like the Balmar APM).
 

caius

New member
29
7
London
For those with or considering a Renogy type "sealed" battery with internal BMS be very aware of their limitations. Those internal BMS units usually can only handle 50A-100A of charging.
That's something that's not specifically restricted to drop in type batteries - any MOSFET based BMS will have similar limitations, but with the self-contained batteries you are stuck with whichever BMS capacity they decide to include. At least with separate cells and BMS you can select one which has sufficient capacity for your charging requirements.

It comes down to being aware of the specification of your system - I'm not convinced that battery manufacturers and sellers always do a sufficiently good job of explaining the difference with LFP batteries when they are sold as 'drop-in' replacements.
 

jzk

Super Anarchist
13,025
483
That's something that's not specifically restricted to drop in type batteries - any MOSFET based BMS will have similar limitations, but with the self-contained batteries you are stuck with whichever BMS capacity they decide to include. At least with separate cells and BMS you can select one which has sufficient capacity for your charging requirements.

It comes down to being aware of the specification of your system - I'm not convinced that battery manufacturers and sellers always do a sufficiently good job of explaining the difference with LFP batteries when they are sold as 'drop-in' replacements.
Mine can handle 100A each, and I have 9.
 

Sailabout

Super Anarchist
Not in LiPo. LiPo stands for Lithium-Polymer, which is probably the most dangerous lithium chemistry out there. Used in applications where light weight and performance are more important than safety, like RC planes and helicopters.

Phosphate is used in Lithium-Iron-Phosphate batteries, LiFePO4 or LFP for short. These are the safest lithiums out there, and are the ones we use in boats.

Don't mix the terms, they are important.
thats what I meant, thanks for the lesson
 
Just got a pair of these to go with the two I’ve been running for a couple years $1100 for the pair

View attachment 499005
We've been looking at various manufacturers and consulting with our insurance agent, and three things came up in our underwriter's requirements for continuing coverage when upgrading to lithium.

1) The batteries had to carry UL approval/listing
2) External BMS was mandatory
3) Overcurrent protection for other key systems was mandatory

They also mentioned that they wanted end to end system schematic, and it had to be installed by an installer that would sign off on the installation as not having deviated from the design.

Talking to a few others with older, but higher value yachts in similar discussions with their underwriters showed this is not uncommon these days.
 

CapDave

Anarchist
617
711
Bermuda
We've been looking at various manufacturers and consulting with our insurance agent, and three things came up in our underwriter's requirements for continuing coverage when upgrading to lithium.

1) The batteries had to carry UL approval/listing
2) External BMS was mandatory
3) Overcurrent protection for other key systems was mandatory

They also mentioned that they wanted end to end system schematic, and it had to be installed by an installer that would sign off on the installation as not having deviated from the design.

Talking to a few others with older, but higher value yachts in similar discussions with their underwriters showed this is not uncommon these days.
I had the same conversation with my agent, their UK underwriters had a lot of questions and eventually got to the same place as above. I was planning to do a full Lithionics install anyway, UL approved battery, external dual channel BMS, and a Field control circuit on the BMS that shuts off both alternators and each charging source if the BMS has an overcurrent event.
 

mermike

New member
3
0
Boise, ID
Which underwriter insists on an external BMS?
We've been looking at various manufacturers and consulting with our insurance agent, and three things came up in our underwriter's requirements for continuing coverage when upgrading to lithium.

1) The batteries had to carry UL approval/listing
2) External BMS was mandatory
3) Overcurrent protection for other key systems was mandatory

They also mentioned that they wanted end to end system schematic, and it had to be installed by an installer that would sign off on the installation as not having deviated from the design.

Talking to a few others with older, but higher value yachts in similar discussions with their underwriters showed this is not uncommon these days.
 
I've personally sworn off the Balmar and other "marine" alternators. You can get pretty much the same thing from Delco or Neville for a small fraction of the price. Will need to convert it to external regulation though (about $100 at a shop). That's just my opinion - my last experience with them was purchasing a $1300 Balmar, running it for 10 hours, then replacing it with a $280 Delco that outperformed the Balmar in every way, sold the Balmar on eBay for $700, making me $600 smarter.
@DDW very curious about your experience here. What model Delco alternator? Is the output curve better?
 

DDW

Super Anarchist
6,951
1,402
I used a Delco 28Si. Output of the Balmar at idle was underwater, insufficient to feed even the motor electronics. Output of the Delco about 90 amps net at same idle. Output at cruise cold Delco a little more, and hot about the same or maybe Delco a little more - both derate considerably when hot, whether controlled by the Balmar or Wakespeed regulator. I did convert the Delco to external regulation. At a frame temp of 100° C, about 100A net from each, so maybe 120 considering house loads. The 28si also comes in a 200A spec, but I doubt the cooling is any different so it will still derate to the same. Delco now makes a 40Si, a little longer body and won't fit my application.
 
Top