Is it really drifting away or just wandering all over the anchorage with its twin anchors set and too much scope?
Is it really drifting away or just wandering all over the anchorage with its twin anchors set and too much scope?
He poured a certified metric shit ton of lead into the keels (that have a large "bulb").
My armchair guess is that stability will be similar to many successful motorsailer type vessels.
Keeping the water out of his hull ports (when heeled) will be the thing to watch out for.
Panope is a tender boat. Probably more tender than any body else's boat in this forum (Main is reefed at 12 knots). Here are the numbers/reasons:
Low(ish) ballast ratio - 32%
Shallow Draft - 4'
Narrow WL beam - 9'
Deep Vee hull Section (buoyancy where you do not want it)
Wheel house addition (500 pounds of weight where you do not want it)
Fuel stored above WL (gonna change that soon)
Center of effort 1.5 feet above the Design Sail Plan
All of the above is screaming TENDER.
Pete, scope has not gained any meaning to Doug yet. I think he may have 80' out and that is mostly chain. He put a second anchor out when a cold front came through last week. I think that the NW winds from the cold front passages have progressively pushed the Seeker to the SE since he first dropped anchor upon arrival from Dauphine Is. He is still a long way north of the ICW and probably far enough away from all those nice homes on either side of Pirates Cove to keep them from dropping a dime on him. I don't think those folks would do such a thing, after all this is not West Palm Beach.Is it really drifting away or just wandering all over the anchorage with its twin anchors set and too much scope?
i don't think he has enough rode to have too much scopeIs it really drifting away or just wandering all over the anchorage with its twin anchors set and too much scope?
Thanks for local knowledge,Rasper. The surrounding topography appears relatively flat, hence he might not get much shelter from winds,per se, thus dragging his sorry ass around that small cove. He does however appear protected enough from any serious wave action coming up from the Gulf, short of a hurricane.Pete, scope has not gained any meaning to Doug yet. I think he may have 80' out and that is mostly chain. He put a second anchor out when a cold front came through last week. I think that the NW winds from the cold front passages have progressively pushed the Seeker to the SE since he first dropped anchor upon arrival from Dauphine Is. He is still a long way north of the ICW and probably far enough away from all those nice homes on either side of Pirates Cove to keep them from dropping a dime on him. I don't think those folks would do such a thing, after all this is not West Palm Beach.
Could be. He has something like 80 odd feet of chain out on two anchors already and that anchor drum still has lots of poly on it. Although as Rasputin22 mentioned,"scope has not gained any meaning to Doug yet". I am wholeheartedly inclined to agree with this statement.i don't think he has enough rode to have too much scope
Labradors are the archetypal omnivore. I knew a labrador that ate a ten-pound fruit cake...including the aluminum foil in which it was wraped. No effect other than glitter poop.I am serial labrador owner
onions, chocolate, raisins - all highly edible with no discernable ill effects
Not really relevant, my point was it's not long (20-30 years by most estimates) before it becomes more economical to replace a steel vessel rather than to continue trying to maintain it (ice class and other specialized vessels obviously have a slightly different calculus as they are more expensive to replace, and the navy generally doesn't do "economical" at all on principe). Of course corrosion isn't the only culprit, but it's been a significant one, at least to date....Why don't you tell us?
After all it was your claim.
You do understand the difference between a "data point" and "datax right? You're cherry-picking outliers...Data point: I used to work aboard a 30 year old steel boat. It was an icebreaker which is about as hard duty you can get outside a ship that's actually being shot at.
I know of a 100 year old steel yacht local to me. And another one built in 1948. And I just looked at a steel ex fishing vessel built in 1960. I'll leave you to do the simple subtraction needed to work out their current age.
What statement? "Salt water is a corrosive environment?" I stand by it....Basically your statement is bullshit,
It's a pretty simple concept really, not really rocket science butif you want to stick a tail on it and call it a weasel knock yourself out! 🤣🤣you can't back it up and even using weasel words like 'average economic working life' doesn't cut it.
FKT
when you no longer feel it necassary to insert an asterisx in the word cunt you will be a fully fledged SA member.They're both outlines, and trying to use either example as evidence of the longevity of steel boats under typical circumstances would only serve to prove that I'm an argumentative c*nt with poor reading comprehension skills
What
Not really relevant, my point was it's not long (20-30 years by most estimates) before it becomes more economical to replace a steel vessel rather than to continue trying to maintain it (ice class and other specialized vessels obviously have a slightly different calculus as they are more expensive to replace, and the navy generally doesn't do "economical" at all on principe). Of course corrosion isn't the only culprit, but it's been a significant one, at least to date....
I would also say that size of said vessel is quite large part of that equation. It is much cheaper to slip small boat every few years to change anodes and paint hull. Keeps it much cheaper than building a new one every 30 years. Even heavily used vessels like steelhulled fishing boats seem to have pretty long service life.Munz, it seems to me that the economic life of a steel vessel may vary significantly by type of vessel, and by other factors such as climate and ownership structures.
For example, ferries often have quite a long life, but bulk carriers seem to have sort lives.
That sounds like a great move. Letting Doug censor the comments has gotta be a great way to make the boat less unstable, more structurally sound, and its skipper more clueful.In an interesting turn of events, the moderator over at Reddit for the sub r/svseeker, who was always a fan of Doug, decided to turn the sub over to Doug and Betsy.
A child does it with "NANNANANANANnananan I can't hear you". (some of us do it with money/time/lives)Obviously, if people can't describe the problems, then the problems won't exist. Just obviously.