So to compare that Colvin report with a worst case analysis showing GM as 0.88m and this analysis showing 1.1' for Seeker - seems bad - are we reading correctly? That report goes on to draw conclusions using other derived stability rather directly using GM - am I reading all correctly? - but GM this bad would be expected to result in much worse derived stability figures? Again, is this a valid conclusion?
I THINK so.
But I am an amateur with this stuff.
I hope people like Zonk will read that report and chime in.