Schakel
Dayboat sailor
Smooth sailing,There is going to be very minimal wave action. No bashing into anything unpleasant.
Bring your grandma and simple Yoej with you.
Actually I like that.
Merry Christmas.
Last edited by a moderator:
Smooth sailing,There is going to be very minimal wave action. No bashing into anything unpleasant.
Merry Xmas Jack..Read above and learn.
I too have seen those discussions and most opinions are based on ignorance. Also nearly with out exception those discussions are for a single vessel not a flotilla of race boats, so pretty irelevant.I've seen enough discussions on the topic here and on Cruiser Forum by experienced sailors and my opinion is based on those discussions . There's a time for HF and a time when it is unnecessary. S2H is the latter..
https://static.cyca.com.au/media/3440507/provisional-div-list-23-dec.pdfMerry Christmas all. Does anyone know where one can find a list of IRC handicaps for competitors?
Thanks Duncan. Best of luck for the trip south.https://static.cyca.com.au/media/3440507/provisional-div-list-23-dec.pdf
Linked from the race documents
1 hour ago, jack_sparrow said:
Talking 100 footer sailmaking
Look at the end of the SI's http://media.prod.cyca.s3.amazonaws.com/media/3440461/rolex-sydney-hobart-yacht-race-2019-sailing-instructions-v2.pdfWhere can I find it?
Yes, if you're talking about commercial vessels using GMDSS stations. But this is a yacht race and the boats should only have to comply with their national regulations for communications. It has nothing to do with IMO requirements for merchant ships.To be compliant with the digital age and international SAR requirements any HF must be DSC compatible. The CYC don't make DSC HF a mandatory requirement for reasons above and so the Australian taxpayer pays to have HF voice only monitored just for this race.
- The alternative is the CYC accept Sat Phone which is not an SAR accepted platform OR insist all competitors switch over to recognised SAR satellite terminals.
Zonc didn't say it was a IMO requirement (which is >300t). The IMO reference was to underpin HF technology and it's status in safety communications. HF voice ceased being monitored by AMSA at Charleville and Wiluna years ago.But this is a yacht race and the boats should only have to comply with their national regulations for communications. It has nothing to do with IMO requirements for merchant ships.
Ta,Thanks Duncan. Best of luck for the trip south.
yeh - well then we can have the argument as to whether this should be a cat1 race.Zonc didn't say it was a IMO requirement (which is >300t). The IMO reference was to underpin HF technology and it's status in safety communications. HF voice ceased being monitored by AMSA at Charleville and Wiluna years ago.
DSC HF as a mandatory requirement in World Sailing and Australian Sailings Offshore Regulations for Cat 1 Races is as follows.
WS.
3.29.10 an MF/HF marine SSB transceiver (GMDSS/DSC) with at least 125 W transmitter power and frequency range from at least 1.6 to 29.9 MHz with permanently installed antenna and earth.
AS
3.25.1 The following waterproof or marine standard communication equipment shall be provided:
(a) (i) Permanently installed HF transceiver.
(ii) All new HF transceivers shall be DSC capable.
(i) It is recommended that all HF transceivers be DSC.
(c) A satellite phone is recommended. The satellite phone should have coverage of the race area, and be connected to the main power or have a spare battery.
Dunc the above Special Regs for DSC HF also apply to Cat 2. As you know RO's have the discretion to amend Special Regs as they see fit.yeh - well then we can have the argument as to whether this should be a cat1 race.
Thankfully the ocean and Bass Strait crossing races are organised by the most progressive club in Aus, as opposed to this race which is organised by the most regressive.yeh - well then we can have the argument as to whether this should be a cat1 race.
Dunc, have a fast safe tripTa,
first half is looking pretty good for us small suckers.