I just stripped down my I14 mast and (like every time I do this) was shocked about the weight of the shroud bundle relatively to the weight of the naked mast. The standard in our fleet is 3mm Dyform for baby/main/forestay and 2,5mm for uppers.
We had a succesfull boat with PBO rigging but the handling during transport was terrible, the attachment fittings complex and not very aerodynamic and it's basically not available in Germany. They eventually broke a rod when the crew got caught in it with the trapeze hook and they switched back to wire.
With more and more yachts switching to dyneema, has there been any development lately to make this interesting for dinghies?
My shrouds are lashed to the hull with dyneema, the whole shroud/forestay adjustment system is dyneema and the trapezes are 2,5mm dyneema and are lasting several seasons in the sun.
The rope is stretching quite a lot during the first sessions but after a while there is no more movement and I get the exact same rig tension every time.
Why not use dyneema for standing rigging? Is it just the problem with chafing or are there other reasons?
We had a succesfull boat with PBO rigging but the handling during transport was terrible, the attachment fittings complex and not very aerodynamic and it's basically not available in Germany. They eventually broke a rod when the crew got caught in it with the trapeze hook and they switched back to wire.
With more and more yachts switching to dyneema, has there been any development lately to make this interesting for dinghies?
My shrouds are lashed to the hull with dyneema, the whole shroud/forestay adjustment system is dyneema and the trapezes are 2,5mm dyneema and are lasting several seasons in the sun.
The rope is stretching quite a lot during the first sessions but after a while there is no more movement and I get the exact same rig tension every time.
Why not use dyneema for standing rigging? Is it just the problem with chafing or are there other reasons?