Looks like the SBS had a busy Sunday.....Tanker stowaways: Seven detained off Isle of Wight https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-54684440
Couldn't get much more 'in your own backyard' could you. Do you reckon they had the Sunday Roast before or after the quick tanker assault...?So you've been doing a bit of gentle stowing away, you've almost reached your destination, and 6 helicopter loads of the SBS turn up. That's a disappointing end to the trip, and probably a pair of trousers.
It's not quite the Iranian embassy, but not every generation get to do that.
ooh long after dinner .. but may be before supper.Couldn't get much more 'in your own backyard' could you. Do you reckon they had the Sunday Roast before or after the quick tanker assault...?
Celebratory tea and Battenbergs...?ooh long after dinner .. but may be before supper.
Hands to dinner, officers to lunch as they say.ooh long after dinner .. but may be before supper.
You thinking what I'm thinking? The crew was in on it from the start, making a little money on the side smuggling illegals, changed their minds or maybe held out for more money, and the whole thing went south when the smugglees didn't play ball?So I am curious. The crew knew about the stowaways. Did anyone in Britain know about the stowaways before the call for help?
((Apologies to European and Asian readers - Explanations have to be given because Americans (North and South) are clueless about this type of situation. ))You thinking what I'm thinking? The crew was in on it from the start, making a little money on the side smuggling illegals, changed their minds or maybe held out for more money, and the whole thing went south when the smugglees didn't play ball?
True only to the extent that the port state they are disembarked at, requires repatriation at ship's expense (and almost all do). I don't think maritime law, absent a port state law, requires repatriationThe shipping company is responsible for all costs of repatriating all humans who arrive and don't leave on a vessel, and maintaining them until repatriation, hence the reluctance to declare stowaways at the earliest convenience. If the ship delayed reporting the extra people aboard, it's because they were hoping for a cheaper resolution. Am not saying the russian approach is wrong, I don't want anyone aboard, ever, I have not invited, it's like a home invasion, but lasts for weeks.
However we all know that actually using your insurance isn't great for next year's premiums. So he'll have that to answer for to his boss.True only to the extent that the port state they are disembarked at, requires repatriation at ship's expense (and almost all do). I don't think maritime law, absent a port state law, requires repatriation
So--- that said, mandatory repatriation of stowaways is covered by their P&I insurance terms. So the captain that "lets" them swim for it, or puts them on a rickety raft made from dunnage wood, so they would drift ashore (no guffaws, it has happened) is either an idiot, or a dullard. Insurance picks up the tab.