- Moderator
- #2,381
1 hour ago, Lure said:
And she is officially out:
Totally.The boat is awesome; the designers and builders, shore team, crew to be commended.
But in order to maintain enthusiasm, I have to avoid looking too closely at the invited NYYC crowd in the video.
I suppose that the idea is that Boat 1 will be a candidate for the campaign as much as the Defiance was a defence candidate in 1914. Boat 2 might be christened with a name that is more reminiscent of Cup winner like America or Magic...let's hope she fares better than Defiance did for the NNYC back in 1914!
Of course, but since the NZ foils look very similar to foils that AM has already tested on the mule (minus a few little curves on the tip). It would be save to assume that AM already has data on foils like NZ is using."If the AM foil design is significantly better than the NZ design" then again, if the NZ design is significantly better than the AM design, AM will not only struggle to win the Americas Cup, but they may not even make the match itself as they will have their work cut out for them just beating Stars + Stripes.
So are you saying that ETNZ is being so inclusive and generous to S+S, letting them hang on, not just to make the event better by having more challengers, but to:"If the AM foil design is significantly better than the NZ design" then again, if the NZ design is significantly better than the AM design, AM will not only struggle to win the Americas Cup, but they may not even make the match itself as they will have their work cut out for them just beating Stars + Stripes.
Can see the twin skin too.Quite a bit different to the Kiwi boat aft of the mast with her sunken deck, and much shallower, and narrower ramp. Boom is set very close to the base of the mast.
They don't look to be doing any radical shaping with it yet - as far as I could see.Can see the twin skin too.
Nope. I'm saying Stars + Stripes boat (if it eventuates) will be identical to Te Aihe, so if the ETNZ design is significantly better than the AM design, logically the Stars + Stripes design, being identical to the ETNZ design should also be significantly faster, which will mean, AM will first need to beat a significantly better Stars + Stripes design (again, if it eventuates) in order to make the match.So are you saying that ETNZ is being so inclusive and generous to S+S, letting them hang on, not just to make the event better by having more challengers, but to:
1.) Get data on an ETNZ type design vs other challengers, especially AM, in the Prada Cup
and/ or
2.) Possible have an ETNZ type design knock out challengers so that ETNZ can defend against an earlier version of itself?
Nice.
Though they haven't seen them in use. Unlike ETNZ who have now seen what the AM foils seemingly can and can't do through the Mule, and now early testing of Defiant.Of course, but since the NZ foils look very similar to foils that AM has already tested on the mule (minus a few little curves on the tip). It would be save to assume that AM already has data on foils like NZ is using.