Rasputin22
Rasputin22
- 14,569
- 4,097
The 2023 Aviation Thread
- Thread starter Ventucky Red
- Start date
MagentaLine
Super Antichrist
- 572
- 225
Jet engine theory at Navy Flight School:
Suck - Squeeze - Bang - Blow.
Fuel can’t burn without air. Not enough air in equals compressor stall.
Turbojet engines are thirsty and require lots of fuel…but are compact (smaller diameter)
Turbofans are much more fuel efficient , but are larger in diameter (hang under wing rather the be in fuselage)
But all jet engines are air pumps, and the path to more power requires more air in. You can’t Squeeze, Bang and Blow unless you Suck it in…
Edited to include "Squeeze" into the sequence. 35 years on, the memory of flight school is a little dusty
Last edited:
Ventucky Red
Super Anarchist
- 11,945
- 1,499
- Thread starter
- #184
In essence a two stroke engine... or very simular with the suck-bang-blow
Mark_K
Super Anarchist
The Suck is strong with this one.
hackaday.com
Ugliest Airplane Ever Built Predicted The Future
The airplane that many called “the flying barrel” is also widely considered the ugliest plane ever built. However, [Dark Skies] in the video you can see below argues that the Stipa-Capr…
hackaday.com
Liquid
NFLTG
Interesting camera perspective on a carrier landing. Not as much input as I thought it would be, but it didn't look windy.
This looks like a pure manual mode pass, so pilot is "hand flying" the jet. 100's of small inputs. Somewhere like 400 plus on a typical pass. In 2016 first version of "Magic Carpet" debuted, and reduced that to like 10-12 control inputs. In 2021, they upgraded it so you can even fly approaches with aircraft failures (like being single engine).
The loss of the F-35C on Carl Vinson was because the pilot thought he had it engaged, and did not. As a result of that loss, engaging ACP/PLC (for F-35)/PLM for F-18 is now a mandatory step in the landing checklist.
Google Magic Carpet F-18 or F-35 for a more detailed explanation.
The loss of the F-35C on Carl Vinson was because the pilot thought he had it engaged, and did not. As a result of that loss, engaging ACP/PLC (for F-35)/PLM for F-18 is now a mandatory step in the landing checklist.
Google Magic Carpet F-18 or F-35 for a more detailed explanation.
Ventucky Red
Super Anarchist
- 11,945
- 1,499
- Thread starter
- #188
Cool stuff... thanks for sharing.
Sounds like a Cat III system that also computes the pitch, roll, and speed of the boat.
Liquid
NFLTG
I saw boat speed but I didn't see the pitch and roll part below but makes sense with this stat:
news.usni.org
"Of 598 passes during the testing period, there was only one bolter – whereas Dominick said during a normal deployment with that much flying each pilot would likely have a couple really scary landings and plenty more bolters."
Navy's MAGIC CARPET Simplifies Carrier Landings; Interim Fielding This Fall - USNI News
ABOARD USS GEORGE WASHINGTON, OFF THE COAST OF VIRGINIA – The Navy has completed testing of its MAGIC CARPET technology that simplifies the process of landing a fighter on an aircraft carrier – with data suggesting that pilots may make single-digit flight path corrections on final approach...
news.usni.org
"Of 598 passes during the testing period, there was only one bolter – whereas Dominick said during a normal deployment with that much flying each pilot would likely have a couple really scary landings and plenty more bolters."
billy backstay
Backstay, never bought a suit, never went to Vegas
"Bolter" - A go around when the tailhook misses the wire, good description!!
EDIT - Probably also describes the sphincters reaction to said maneuver!!
EDIT - Probably also describes the sphincters reaction to said maneuver!!
Last edited:
Mrleft8
Super Anarchist
The Trenton Helicopter fly-in is today and tomorrow. Lots of fun. This year there will be an EV helicopter on exhibit.
Liquid
NFLTG
The choice is to land on the boat or end your naval aviation career when you ditch your $80M plane in the ocean...
No stress at all!
Keith
Super Anarchist
Waiex191
Member
Sikorsky flight test in Florida builds fuselage shaped berms up to land on in case of gear failure.
veni vidi vici
Omne quod audimus est opinio, non res. Omnia videm
- 8,890
- 2,103
Not as dangerous as it seems
veni vidi vici
Omne quod audimus est opinio, non res. Omnia videm
- 8,890
- 2,103
This is the math I would not trust
veni vidi vici
Omne quod audimus est opinio, non res. Omnia videm
- 8,890
- 2,103
I’ll drop this here
Scientists at NASA built a gun specifically to launch standard 4 pound dead chickens at the windshields of airliners, military jets and the space shuttle, all traveling at maximum velocity. The idea is to simulate the frequent incidents of collisions with airborne fowl to test the strength of the windshields.
British engineers heard about the gun and were eager to test it on the windshields of their new high speed trains. Arrangements were made, and a gun was sent to the British engineers. When the gun was fired, the engineers stood shocked as the chicken hurled out of the barrel, crashed into the shatterproof shield, smashed it to smithereens, blasted through the control console, snapped the engineer's back- rest in two, and embedded itself in the back wall of the cabin, like an arrow shot from a bow.
The horrified Brits sent NASA the disastrous results of the experiment, along with the designs of the windshield and begged the U.S. scientists for suggestions.
NASA responded with a one-line memo, "Defrost the chicken."
Scientists at NASA built a gun specifically to launch standard 4 pound dead chickens at the windshields of airliners, military jets and the space shuttle, all traveling at maximum velocity. The idea is to simulate the frequent incidents of collisions with airborne fowl to test the strength of the windshields.
British engineers heard about the gun and were eager to test it on the windshields of their new high speed trains. Arrangements were made, and a gun was sent to the British engineers. When the gun was fired, the engineers stood shocked as the chicken hurled out of the barrel, crashed into the shatterproof shield, smashed it to smithereens, blasted through the control console, snapped the engineer's back- rest in two, and embedded itself in the back wall of the cabin, like an arrow shot from a bow.
The horrified Brits sent NASA the disastrous results of the experiment, along with the designs of the windshield and begged the U.S. scientists for suggestions.
NASA responded with a one-line memo, "Defrost the chicken."
Waiex191
Member
Fifteen years ago, brainwashing in process. The kids loved flying in the 2-33. Once they got to 60 lbs I could put them in the front with ballast.
Waiex191
Member
The REAL Story Behind the Chinese Balloon Intercept
The following account has been recenly declassified and submitted by the owner of Sonex 1153, Graeme Smith: It can now be revealed that the shoot down of the Chinese balloon on 4th February 2023 wa…
www.sonexaircraft.com
billy backstay
Backstay, never bought a suit, never went to Vegas
Is that from Borowitz Report??
