badlatitude
Super Anarchist
- 31,148
- 5,951
I hope he has enough for a good lawyer.That's a $120K Tesla Model X. So Tom's friend is a man of some means.
I hope he has enough for a good lawyer.
This seems like the perfect place for this.
No wonder you support Joe Biden and oppose Rand Paul on that subject! You don't even understand the difference between civil and criminal asset forfeiture. It's a bit more complicated than auto liability, where you've also demonstrated no understanding.Tom will be upset but the gun has been confiscated by the po po, another case of civil asset forfeiture.
Oh yeah, same as the point you're pursuing by blaming me for some criminal's behavior toward a skateboarder. Gun owners are responsible for the actions of criminals. Go ahead and say it out loud again, you know you think it.It also absolves individuals of the LIABILITY FOR USE by others. So if your roommate steals your keys and bypasses your 'secure gun storage' and uses your gun to holdup a liquor store, you're totally good. But if your roommate steals your keys and runs over a little old lady with your car, well that's what you have liability insurance for.
Intentionally placing someone in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury
^ Just WTF?
YAY!!!
Tom, You are a silly man. It's more like a tax to prevent the deluge of weapons entering the marketplace. That's the point, and it was explained in the opening of the announcement. Your NRA messaging is a diversionary tactic to slow the advent of a new age of fewer automatic weapons. Poor people do not buy automatic weapons, they have better uses for their money, and the NRA's attempt to drop those prices to $9.99 a weapon is foolhardy and frankly dangerous to the future safety of this country.Taxing suitable militia weapons like yours won't affect people like yourself, who can afford a five figure SCAR assault weapon and the tax on it.
It's more like a poll tax: intended to restrict the rights of the poor while folks like yourself sit back with an "I've got my assault weapon" grin.
Many of those poor people whose rights you wish to burden are minorities. I wouldn't have to be the one to point that out if we were talking about a right that TeamD was interested in protecting instead of undermining.
Taxing suitable militia weapons like yours won't affect people like yourself, who can afford a five figure SCAR assault weapon and the tax on it.
It's more like a poll tax: intended to restrict the rights of the poor while folks like yourself sit back with an "I've got my assault weapon" grin.
Many of those poor people whose rights you wish to burden are minorities. I wouldn't have to be the one to point that out if we were talking about a right that TeamD was interested in protecting instead of undermining.