The debate over assault weapons

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
65,112
2,442
Punta Gorda FL
When will you start actually advocating removal of some of the 1st 10 amendments so your "guns only for the government" utopia can start the door-to-door search and seizure?

That is what it would take, otherwise it is just a new version of the war on (some) drugs.

You're talking to a Canadian. Canada is hard at work figuring out how to take away battlefield .22's and other such weapons of mass destruction.

The three year anniversary of the heroic ban recently passed and I'm told that soon they will be rounding up weapons and making Canada safe again.

"Soon" to a Canadian and "Soon mon" to a Bahamian used to be different. I'm not sure they are any more.
 

Not for nothing

Super Anarchist
4,472
1,181
jupiter
This says it all

Fareed Zakaria: America might as well be on another planet




Guns are for COWARDS OR KILLERS
Remember the Bible/ 10 commandants "Thou shalt not KILL" and we're suppose to be a Christian nation
What a fucking joke
 
Last edited:

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
65,112
2,442
Punta Gorda FL
Remember the Bible/ 10 commandants
There's only one Commandant in my life.

bb87d72001c6ab66f193be3baf92a232.jpg
 

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
65,112
2,442
Punta Gorda FL
Tom will, of course, correct me, but his "Battlefield 22" is really a .0223, not .022. He does that intentionally to confuse the two distinctly different types of rounds and make his 223 seem sedate. Most people are familiar with their grandpa's .022 and it seems innocent enough. Few non-gun nuts (unless they've had military experience) are familiar with the .0223.
DWO will, of course, correct me, but the "assault weapons" that TeamD talks about banning are guns of any caliber, not just the ones they mention in speeches.

They do this intentionally to confuse people into thinking they don't want to ban guns that are generally viewed as "sedate." Most people are familiar with their Grandpa's .22 and are unaware that TeamD/Grabby types dishonestly talk about other guns while proposing to ban the "innocent" and "sedate" .22's along with them.

And yes, I'm accusing TeamD/Grabbers of being a bunch of liars. If anyone proves me wrong, I'll do that non-asshole thing where I apologize for the baseless accusation of deception.

I await my correction eagerly.
 

Danceswithoctopus

Cephalopod
2,578
1,234
Whulge
DWO will, of course, correct me, but the "assault weapons" that TeamD talks about banning are guns of any caliber, not just the ones they mention in speeches.

They do this intentionally to confuse people into thinking they don't want to ban guns that are generally viewed as "sedate." Most people are familiar with their Grandpa's .22 and are unaware that TeamD/Grabby types dishonestly talk about other guns while proposing to ban the "innocent" and "sedate" .22's along with them.

And yes, I'm accusing TeamD/Grabbers of being a bunch of liars. If anyone proves me wrong, I'll do that non-asshole thing where I apologize for the baseless accusation of deception.

I await my correction eagerly.
Oh, sweetie, were you triggered by my posts?
 

Not for nothing

Super Anarchist
4,472
1,181
jupiter
Says who?
should have used purple, it was a joke, far from the truth
It just seems many of the laws, bills, etc in Red states are based on Christians teachings, Anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-drag queens, anti-history. or at least that's the excuse they used follow the writings of the great COMIC book.
 

Liquid

NFLTG
6,257
1,626
Over there
Get out the vote!

We The People overwhelmingly demand gun reform but 535 'representatives' aren't interested?

We pay their fucking salaries, benefits and lifetime pensions! Who is paying for their vacations, well that depends...
 

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
65,112
2,442
Punta Gorda FL

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
50,767
13,486
Eastern NC
Get out the vote!

We The People overwhelmingly demand gun reform but 535 'representatives' aren't interested?

We pay their fucking salaries, benefits and lifetime pensions! Who is paying for their vacations, well that depends...
Actually, it's a core group within the Republican House caucus... about 100 individuals out of 217 votes... that are arrogant about making the gun problem worse.

The fact that libtards hate guns just confirms to them that they are on the right track.

What will it take for the rest of the Republicans to grow a spine and break away from them?
 

Not for nothing

Super Anarchist
4,472
1,181
jupiter
Actually, it's a core group within the Republican House caucus... about 100 individuals out of 217 votes... that are arrogant about making the gun problem worse.

The fact that libtards hate guns just confirms to them that they are on the right track.

What will it take for the rest of the Republicans to grow a spine and break away from them?
Hypocrites,
The thing I find interesting that our Republicans leader, ( Desatan, Abbot Trump)
You can carry a weapon except around them?
So it's OK for us to shoot each other, but not them When their the ones that should be shot.
 

amphib44

Member
84
23
Wayzata
DWO will, of course, correct me, but the "assault weapons" that TeamD talks about banning are guns of any caliber, not just the ones they mention in speeches.

They do this intentionally to confuse people into thinking they don't want to ban guns that are generally viewed as "sedate." Most people are familiar with their Grandpa's .22 and are unaware that TeamD/Grabby types dishonestly talk about other guns while proposing to ban the "innocent" and "sedate" .22's along with them.

And yes, I'm accusing TeamD/Grabbers of being a bunch of liars. If anyone proves me wrong, I'll do that non-asshole thing where I apologize for the baseless accusation of deception.

I await my correction eagerly.
I know very little about guns, but I am wondering if you consider .223 as a .22?
 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
50,767
13,486
Eastern NC
Hypocrites,
The thing I find interesting that our Republicans leader, ( Desatan, Abbot Trump)
You can carry a weapon except around them?
So it's OK for us to shoot each other, but not them When their the ones that should be shot.

Even in purple, I wish you would not post things like that. It degrades public discussion, no matter what one may believe privately.

But one point you make, that ought to be repeated often and loudly: gun bans obviously work, that's why Republican and NRA leaders ban guns in their presence.
 



Latest posts

SA Podcast

Sailing Anarchy Podcast with Scot Tempesta

Sponsored By:

Top