The debate over assault weapons

jocal505

moderate, informed, ex-gunowner
14,236
287
near Seattle, Wa
I asked over at The Firing Line and the gun nutz over there seem to think it's not a great gun.

I've asked them if there's a better .22 handgun from the same shopping list that I might consider.
You don't have enough .22's? We need more posts about them Tom. Good job so far. Keep it rolling, like our eyes.

 

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
61,523
1,709
Punta Gorda FL
You don't have enough .22's? We need more posts about them Tom. Good job so far. Keep it rolling, like our eyes.
No, I don't. They seem to be useful for annoying elk and I have lots of them to annoy.

I try to fill that need, which does seem acute.

The problem is, there's only one of me, I have a life, and there are political topics other than guns to discuss.

I took a screen shot the other day when I had a bunch of them gathered...

So where are your non-gun topics, Joe?

non-gun-posts.jpg


 

jocal505

moderate, informed, ex-gunowner
14,236
287
near Seattle, Wa
So where are your non-gun topics, Joe?
Let's discuss race relations, and the future of race-baiting on Political Anarchy.  Let's discuss the baseline of armed or unarmed self-defense in North America.  We could discuss the political goals and philosophies of  the eighteenth century.

Let's discuss the civic character desired by Machiavelli, or Jefferson's thoughts on the militia, as he pondered the work Napoleon.

I think you are a two-bit wanker, stuck in a rut Tom.

 
G

Guest

Guest
Let's discuss race relations, and the future of race-baiting on Political Anarchy.  Let's discuss the baseline of armed or unarmed self-defense in North America.  We could discuss the political goals and philosophies of  the eighteenth century.
Yes jocal, I think that is an excellent topic.  Here I'll let you start it off with your quote from the recent past:

The immature, short-sighted desire for gunpower is amplified, and more volatile, among blacks. Even more deadly than among whites

 

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
61,523
1,709
Punta Gorda FL
Gun nutz really don't think much of Intratec, it seems.

I did receive a couple of recommendations for a new addition to our arsenal of assault weapons. I could get either of these with a threaded barrel:

Ruger Mark IV

40150.jpg


Or S&W Victory

10201_01_lg.jpg


Just looking at those, it seems to me that only one of the two could fit a hand my size. I think I need to go to a store or show and pick them up and hold them.

 
G

Guest

Guest
Tom,

I have this setup (different suppressor tho).  I really like the SR-22 with threaded barrel.  I have large hands too and the Ruger fits me very well.  Much better than the pure target models with the straight grips.  This one has different backstraps included to customize for your hands.  

ruger-sr22-sparrowpack-2.jpg


 
Last edited:

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
61,523
1,709
Punta Gorda FL
Looks like a mini Glock.

Kinda scary, even without the can in front. I don't really want a suppressor. Just the naughty threads.

I think the Victory is probably best from the standpoint of elk-annoyance. It doesn't look any more scary than my .22.

 

jocal505

moderate, informed, ex-gunowner
14,236
287
near Seattle, Wa
No, I don't. They seem to be useful for annoying elk and I have lots of them to annoy.

I try to fill that need, which does seem acute.

The problem is, there's only one of me, I have a life, and there are political topics other than guns to discuss.

I took a screen shot the other day when I had a bunch of them gathered...

So where are your non-gun topics, Joe?

^^^  As organized in the Tom Ray database (which Tom says doesn't exist).

Clever boy.  One day this week, you speed-spammed a dozen of your threads in eight minutes, using the threads laid out in your database, with the same exact message about assault weapons/ordinary .22's.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

jocal505

moderate, informed, ex-gunowner
14,236
287
near Seattle, Wa
It's better with the original formatting and the link back to the post for context. Like this:
I thought of you amidst the devastation of the inner cities, Tom. (You want perspective?  From there I could see forever. While MLK's understanding encompassed the poor and disenfranchised, his POV contrasted the incomplete understanding of many.)

You were going to take Judge Taney for a boat ride. How did that go?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
G

Guest

Guest
It's better with the original formatting and the link back to the post for context. Like this:
That’s true. I was just too lazy to go look for it and I don’t have joe’s stalker database to fall back on. 

 

bpm57

Super Anarchist
2,619
60
New Jersey
Jeff doesn't mind race-baiting, and distributes his own raw justice, against biker rapists.
Cite?

Remember all the way back a couple of weeks, Joe? When you claimed to not go down the 3rd grade gutter? When were you planning on living up to that claim?

 

Pertinacious Tom

Importunate Member
61,523
1,709
Punta Gorda FL
I truly don't think that the intention of the (proposed?) bill has any intention of restricting .22 cal. rifles.
That's true in the sense that they didn't just cover .22 rifles as "assault weapons."

.22 handguns are also covered, if they have a threaded barrel. Which is why I want to buy one with a threaded barrel.

 
Top