Steam Flyer
Sophisticated Yet Humble
No, you don't. You react mindlessly and predictably.I think...
No, you don't. You react mindlessly and predictably.I think...
Nope. Neither was our criminal justice system.So are US people ok with the idea of killing someone over a few bucks?
That's an interesting leap being made there !The robbery suspect, who remains at large, will face felony murder charges in the killing, Ogg said. A $30,000 reward is being offered for information leading to his capture.
“We’re going to focus on catching the robbery suspect who started this chain of events,” she said. “I know we can find this killer with your help. Someone knows who he is.”
Because vengeance will make everything ok?I want somebody held accountable, because this family shouldn’t continue to suffer like this.
When somebody dies during a felony, the felon can be charged with that death even if the death was indirect.That's an interesting leap being made there !
So the person who may have had a gun is the killer (he wasn't apprehended, it could have been a fake, it could have been unloaded) and the tool who fired the round is ok.
Just say you thought you heard some gunshots and you're absolved from whatever happens next in Texas, I guess. Yee fukin ha.Shooting at a criminal that was running away and no longer posed an immediate threat. But, I guess you can get away with it.
Indirect?When somebody dies during a felony, the felon can be charged with that death even if the death was indirect.
When somebody dies during a felony, the felon can be charged with that death even if the death was indirect.
Tell it to the judge.Indirect?
In this case, that's a big fucking stretch.
It's not like a murderers get away driver....Tell it to the judge.
yupWhen somebody dies during a felony, the felon can be charged with that death even if the death was indirect.
Do you read english?Yeah. I can see why you want to draw an equivalence between these two scenarios.
In one case, we have an actor, using what he thought was a prop gun, to film a scene in a movie.
In the other case, we have a man who fired a gun with the intent to kill* a human being - but mistakenly killed a different one.
*Please don't embarrass yourself with some bullshit about him trying to wound his target.
Do you read english?
Steam said "Shooting a gun in a manner that kills another person, when the person killed was in no way committing any kind of illegal act, is in fact a crime....You're not allowed to kill people and just say "oops, my bad.""
Steam is wrong. Do you disagree?
When I went through my CCW classes.... that was YUGE no-no!Shooting at a criminal that was running away and no longer posed an immediate threat. But, I guess you can get away with it.
Do you read english?
Steam said "Shooting a gun in a manner that kills another person, when the person killed was in no way committing any kind of illegal act, is in fact a crime....You're not allowed to kill people and just say "oops, my bad.""
Steam is wrong. Do you disagree?
Sometimes....So, it's perfectly legal to kill people?
I made no comment on what Steam wrote. Jzk Did.
You demanding I comment on it now is bullshit. He didn't demand anything
You seemed to think the situation with Baldwin is (somehow) relevant to the thread. Mind reading again?
Else, why bring it up? Why not?
Is one more dead than the other?But, yeah. Using a gun as a prop for filming, and finding out someone fucked up in that a live round was included is exactly the same as what happened to Arlene Alvarez.
Ah, Grumpy. Helping out your little (minded) friend.Is one more dead than the other?
Talking about cute?Ah, Grumpy. Helping out your little (minded) friend.
How cute.