The Melges 15 / Future of American Double Handed Classes

Fretz

Anarchist
614
156
I'd like to see videos of the Melges 15 sailing in the same big water that a Laser and Opti can handle. Rumor has it, it can't handle it.





We haven't ventured offshore but the chop in the bay gets pretty steep.



I would love to sail the boat in waves like you shared. Just haven't had the opportunity.
 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
48,151
11,774
Eastern NC
We haven't ventured offshore but the chop in the bay gets pretty steep.



I would love to sail the boat in waves like you shared. Just haven't had the opportunity.


I would hope that the Melges 15 is fast enough to not benefit from surfing. The Buccaneer (conventional spinnaker) and the Johnson 18 both are... when running in waves, the skipper looks ahead and steers for low spots. The boat planes faster than the local wave train.

Saves a lot of neck strain for the skipper, no trying to look back and catch the next crest.
 

Fretz

Anarchist
614
156
I would hope that the Melges 15 is fast enough to not benefit from surfing. The Buccaneer (conventional spinnaker) and the Johnson 18 both are... when running in waves, the skipper looks ahead and steers for low spots. The boat planes faster than the local wave train.

Saves a lot of neck strain for the skipper, no trying to look back and catch the next crest.
I can confirm the boat is quite a bit faster than the waves downwind.
 

Foredeck Shuffle

More of a Stoic Cynic, Anarchy Sounds Exhausting
When I look at a boat I tend to break it down into something like the following.
  • Hull weight a product of modern materials and technique that results in improved SA/D and D/WL than older designs.
  • Hull shapes that provide more righting moment for less weight with better shapes to minimize wetted surface in light air via bow loading and maximize stern area for control when on a plane.
  • Hull shapes that track well upwind and pierce waves rather than ride over them and is more stable downwind.
  • Hull that removes water out the stern faster than it comes into the cockpit via a false deck and open stern.
  • Narrow chord, long foils for better control especially at speed.
  • Mast with a modern design and materials to not just support a sail but provide automatic de-powering in gusts and high breeze and provide more longevity than prior materials.
  • Sail design that is more powerful but easier to de-power when designed in conjunction with the mast and rigging.
  • Sail materials and battening to provide better control and longevity.
  • If there is a spinnaker, launch and retrieval systems that minimize human effort to reduce the complexity of hoists and douses while avoiding the damage that often occurs during those transitions.
  • Rigging with both more details and simplified controls and providing for a cleaner cockpit for ease of sailing.
Boats that do well in a list like this tend to be more expensive so deciding on a boat with reduced capabilities becomes an exercise in what you do and do not want to pay for. Local one design class be damned because fast is fun.
 

Curious2

Anarchist
937
536
When I look at a boat I tend to break it down into something like the following.
  • Hull weight a product of modern materials and technique that results in improved SA/D and D/WL than older designs.
  • Hull shapes that provide more righting moment for less weight with better shapes to minimize wetted surface in light air via bow loading and maximize stern area for control when on a plane.
  • Hull shapes that track well upwind and pierce waves rather than ride over them and is more stable downwind.
  • Hull that removes water out the stern faster than it comes into the cockpit via a false deck and open stern.
  • Narrow chord, long foils for better control especially at speed.
  • Mast with a modern design and materials to not just support a sail but provide automatic de-powering in gusts and high breeze and provide more longevity than prior materials.
  • Sail design that is more powerful but easier to de-power when designed in conjunction with the mast and rigging.
  • Sail materials and battening to provide better control and longevity.
  • If there is a spinnaker, launch and retrieval systems that minimize human effort to reduce the complexity of hoists and douses while avoiding the damage that often occurs during those transitions.
  • Rigging with both more details and simplified controls and providing for a cleaner cockpit for ease of sailing.
Boats that do well in a list like this tend to be more expensive so deciding on a boat with reduced capabilities becomes an exercise in what you do and do not want to pay for. Local one design class be damned because fast is fun.

Not a bad list, but one that seems rather biased towards expensive boats (as you note) that are at their best in open water and moderate winds, and arguably that's not necessarily what "modern" must, or should, mean.

There was a htwo-person 15' hiking dinghy (pictured below) with just about all of the features you want about 20 years ago. It utterly flopped in the marketplace because it was too complicated and twitchy for most sailors, too hard to sail in confined waters of the typical club course, and yet too slow for the true fans of high speed. So why assume that it was right and the M15 is wrong?

After all, if fast is fun, why sail any non-foiling monohull dinghy instead of a board or cat? Even a Moth or 18 Foot Skiff wouldn't see which way a kitefoiler went in good conditions. Perhaps these days seahugging dinghy sailors should just admit that they can no longer come close to being leading edge in speed and concentrate on the other things dinghies still do really well?

Perhaps, therefore, we should call a boat "modern" even if, like the M15, it's not particularly light and doesn't have "modern" rig materials. At club level, dacron may well last longer for many sailors and full battens aren't necessarily better in the real world of light wind racing on small waters and less than perfect rigging and mooring areas.

If a boat is selling well to today's sailors - like the M15 is - isn't that evidence that it is actually more in tune with "modern sailing" than the more exotic boats that few modern sailors are buying?
After all, stuff like fully battened sails and self draining cockpits were around 50 years ago and carbon spars and laminate sails were seen in the '80s, so it's not as if they are "modern" anyway.

Perhaps in the 2020s we should re-assess where dinghies are in the sailing world and note that the classes that are selling well are generally ones where there have been lots of compromises that trade performance for ease of use, and that's what the modern world actually wants.

By the way, I've been lucky enough to be able to talk design with many of the best small-boat designers, and few (if any) of them today talk about maximising stern area for control; fast boats these days tend to much less planing area aft than those of the '70s and '80s to reduce wetted surface and to prevent nosediving. The way the Bieker boats made the Ice/Wedge style Australian 14s obsolete is an example of this, as is the development in classes like NS14s and the shape of Merlins.

Finally, if "fast is fun" why aren't you on a Formula cat or a foiler, at least? Around here, foilers have a yardstick of around 60 and the fastest thing similar to a Melges 15 (the one in the pic) is only rated 2/3 as fast. If it's really a case of "fast is fun" then you, and anyone who bought something like an upgraded M15, must be pretty miserable.

First glimpse.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Foredeck Shuffle

More of a Stoic Cynic, Anarchy Sounds Exhausting
Is that a 59er? That always looked like fun. I would own one if they were around here, it looks immensely fun.

Why not a foiling A-Cat or something else like that? Several reasons but I'll stick to the most important one. On the Chesapeake Bay, really most of the east coast United States from Connecticut to Georgia, you would be in displacement mode more often than not. Years ago while doing research to help the OA decide when to hold a North Americans for 505's, Bucc18's, J22's, in three different locations I pulled 20 years of NOAA data each time from relevant NOAA wind instruments with historical readings. After dumping that into a database and teasing out ranges for the expected hours of the day the event would occur I found that between June-August the wind is below 5kts on average. Expanding that range from April to October it is just below 7kts. It's is better if you include evening hours but that wasn't relevant to the events. I ws curious so I began pulling data from travel sites I had raced at and a pattern developed in the mid-southern US Atlantic coast, light breezes during expected race hours. Not very good for foilers or any boat that demands breeze to perform well. Hence my focus on powered up boats. Better to pick an over powered boat and sit on shore when it blows 25kts+ a few times a year than be in a boat that is struggling to hit hull speed most days of the year.

I used to help sell boats and what I learned is that fast catches most peoples eye. Take them out on a fast boat and manage it well for them and they get hooked, some even buy one. The problem is that most people cannot handle fast and a powered up boat will scare them and the sales pitch is over. Most people have very little understanding about boats and what makes the go well, what makes them easier to control, or how to manage it in any condition, fast or slow. What does work best is to sell people slow boats that look fast.

If you want to make money, sell sexy looking boats that are incapable of scaring them. The group I was with made enough money to stay afloat for almost a decade but our problem was that we refused to sell slow boats. I am glad we never did.
 

spankoka

Super Anarchist
Every OD class that thrives has its own niche. At my club-the guys who are very competitive are in the F-18 class. The 505 guys have another club-but I am sure they are good. Cats are not my thing, but I can see that the F-18 folks like their thing. Their after race ragchewing is taken up with F-18 tuning and rigging-that's what they like.
 
Last edited:

Kazrob

New member
18
30
Scotland
We had a 59er and it was a great boat, but possibly too far ahead of it's time. Pretty unstable at rest compared to other boats in the same 2 person, hiking asymmetric niche and not a boat to lounge around in easily. Perhaps when the current 29er kids who have grown up messing around in boats like 29ers get older and want a hiker that reminds them of their youth, it's time will come again. I do hope so.
 

JimC

Not actually an anarchist.
8,241
1,188
South East England
Perhaps when the current 29er kids who have grown up messing around in boats like 29ers get older
You realise the early 29er sailors are well into their 40s now? When the 29er came out I predicted a new golden age of high performance sailing when loads of well trained kids with all the skills would graduate to the adult classes. Hasn't happened. The adult high performance classes are even weaker than they were then.
 
2,512
379
USA
Interesting thread over in DA that touches on many of these issues.

 
2,512
379
USA
As the game shrinks, do does our volunteer pool. therefore, combing what was previous one design events to invite several one-designs (scored separately), plus an open class scored using a rating rule seems like a reasonable approach...

Tcat gets it:
Nothing wrong here... but this is the American way of doing things... 15 boats... chopped up into 4 fleets..... I find the fun factor ....simply as a racing event is over after a month.... the pecking order is what it is... and the racing results are predictable. Racing is just a good excuse to go sailing and drink beer with friends. IMO, If you raced everyone together and scored like the post about recording lap times and short courses.. the racing element would get a shot of life. The clock doesn't lie.... when you sail better you have a good measure of it.... If you don't care about performance improvement.... don't worry about the times and the score sheet. The Brits get it and that is why they race dinghies on handicap much more then we do and why the RYA stat tables work.
 

Curious2

Anarchist
937
536
You realise the early 29er sailors are well into their 40s now? When the 29er came out I predicted a new golden age of high performance sailing when loads of well trained kids with all the skills would graduate to the adult classes. Hasn't happened. The adult high performance classes are even weaker than they were then.

While all that is completely true, it makes me feel very old since I was in the first race the 29er prototype ever did! :-(

Sometimes it seems that in that last hour, millions of years into the future when the sun goes nova and the last bit of oxygen is boiling off the blasted blistered surface of planet earth, the final cry of humanity ever to be heard will be someone saying "soon everyone will get into skiffs (or foilers, cats, etc)".

It's a theme that will never die no matter how reality proves it to be wrong. As you know, skiffs and cats have been around now for about 135 years now but we still hear the cry some day soon, their time will come......

The M15, on the other hand, seems to show that a practical modern boat can succeed very nicely, which is wonderful to see.
 
Last edited:
Top