2 hours ago, jack_sparrow said:
You say they don't change direction that might be put to the test...though you right I think they have already sold the more deaths less economic impact message well and won't change.
This not the one I was talking about but a Swedish epidemiology pundit.
This only a few days old and at interview beginning Sweden 160 deaths/million versus UK 240/million is mentioned. Sweden today only couple days later is already 240/m and chasing the UK down at faster rate.
Also his Stockholm herd immunity is a nonsense with most agreeing Stockholm is around 25% infected. The automatic social distancing mentioned plays big role in that so Sweden suppressing more than it looks like.
His point about deaths occuring with lock-downs lifting and death rates balancing out is interesting. The US is the one to watch there.
NZ the beginning (Kiwi doesn't mention Aust the prick) . Sweden from 3.00
I suppose you mean repository, unless you are suggesting that this thread shoves itself up Sweden’s arse?The Swedish non-lockdown "herd immunity" approach to Covid-19 gets plenty of mentions in various threads, so maybe Sweden need a suppository of posts following their progress.
I wrote what I meantI suppose you mean repository, unless you are suggesting that this thread shoves itself up Sweden’s arse?
In context to Norway next door <40 deaths /million.This only a few days old and at interview beginning Sweden 160 deaths/million versus UK 240/million is mentioned. Sweden today only couple days later is already 240/m and chasing the UK down at faster rate.
In context to Norway next door <40 deaths /million.
It's a new invention called UTube...try it and you will get rid of your Super 8 guaranteed.WTF is .......... "only a few days old and at interview beginning Sweden 160 deaths/million versus UK 240/million is mentioned"
^^
You guys are hillarius.
Population Sweden 10.23 million in 2019.
https://www.google.com/search?q=population+of+sweden&amp;oq=population+of+sweden&amp;aqs=chrome..69i57.6595j0j7&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8
You MUPPETS both seem happy with the 2192 death toll figure.
WTF is .......... "only a few days old and at interview beginning Sweden 160 deaths/million versus UK 240/million is mentioned"
you MUPPETS roll out with your now familiar lets scare the bejesus out of ourselves routine.
MUPPET MATHS
2192/10.23 = 214 lets call it 215.
NOT 160
DICKHEADS
The higher the death toll in Sweden and the more wrong the Swedish herd immunity approach is, the better.
Warning. Ignore Belgium COVID mortality per capita...the UK should be the highest.
Rob I feel like a prick disagreeing with you the sensible and thinking Covid one, but I must. So to respect that I have to go "word salad" which bores many to death and some repeats from my posts elsewhere that refer to Sweden.It's way too early to know if the Swedish strategy is better than others. Give it a year, then it may be clear. Whatever strategy a country takes is probably reasonable as long as its health resources aren't overwhelmed.
Yes super important..they are more lock-down than it appears by culture etc.While writing I see Jack's answer above, so will add that a couple of things different there: about 50% were already working from home, low birth rate and small families, pretty disciplined.
An extraordinarily large number of people live alone courtesy of some decades old Swedish Govt social engineering.
The Swedes are the world's original social distancers by culture. This pic courtesy of @The Dark Knight the OP of this thread says it all. Anyone who has spent time in Sweden will recognise this is not an exaggeration.
Hop that is a global thing. Stats in UK USA etc aligning up. Mostly socio economic and understandable ..some suggesting though a higher risk genological thing but too early to tell.One thing that is not mentioned in Swedish media is the ethnicity of the deaths in Sweden. It seems that immigrant death rates are much higher than it is for ethnic Swedes.