I follow it closely.I gather you are ignoring all the more recent research on the efficacy and risks of the mRNA vaccines?
You have shown zero interest in a balance and informed view, so its more fun to take the piss.As a medical professional don't you have an ethical responsibility to present a balanced and informed view rather than taking the piss?
That's incorrect. I had doubts about the veracity of the data from the Pzifer trials from the beginning.You have shown zero interest in a balance and informed view, so its more fun to take the piss.
You have made up your mind and no amount of informed debate or scientific results is going to change your mind.
I follow it closely.
Because that's your pinhead RWNJ "narrative"That's incorrect. I had doubts about the veracity of the data from the Pzifer trials from the beginning.
No, it's pretty clear that you're a pinhead.Have you seen this various research? It’s pretty clear from these and many other research papers and articles that MRNA vaccines are causing myocarditis ...
To be clear. I was saying you doubted the data from the vaccine trials from the beginning and no amount of data is going to change your mind. So I think my statement is correct.That's incorrect. I had doubts about the veracity of the data from the Pzifer trials from the beginning.
Have you seen this various research? It’s pretty clear from these and many other research papers and articles that MRNA vaccines are causing myocarditis in children/youths. Whilst the risk is low, so too are the risks from covid for this age group. Shouldn’t the medical profession/government be spelling out the risks of both covid and myocarditis so that parents can make a more informed decision rather than trying to push vaccinations to this age group?
![]()
Age and sex-specific risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA vaccines - Nature Communications
There have been reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-9 vaccination. Here, the authors use nationwide data from France and find increased risks of these outcomes in the first week following vaccination, for both the first and second dose, and present age- and sex-specific...www.nature.com
![]()
Myocarditis from COVID-19 booster rare, but risk highest among teen boys, young men
Cases of myocarditis – an inflammation of the heart muscle – following a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine are rare and typically mild, research from Israel shows.www.heart.org
Right there you are guilty of politicizing public health discussion.Because that's your pinhead RWNJ "narrative"
Having experienced myocarditis from the flu when I was 19, and having lifelong impacts from it, myocarditis is no joke. (get your flu shot!) And yes, there is a risk of myocarditis from the vaccine. There is a higher risk of myocarditis from the virus. Roll your dice, take your chances.Have you seen this various research? It’s pretty clear from these and many other research papers and articles that MRNA vaccines are causing myocarditis in children/youths. Whilst the risk is low, so too are the risks from covid for this age group. Shouldn’t the medical profession/government be spelling out the risks of both covid and myocarditis so that parents can make a more informed decision rather than trying to push vaccinations to this age group?
![]()
Age and sex-specific risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA vaccines - Nature Communications
There have been reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-9 vaccination. Here, the authors use nationwide data from France and find increased risks of these outcomes in the first week following vaccination, for both the first and second dose, and present age- and sex-specific...www.nature.com
![]()
Myocarditis from COVID-19 booster rare, but risk highest among teen boys, young men
Cases of myocarditis – an inflammation of the heart muscle – following a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine are rare and typically mild, research from Israel shows.www.heart.org
Vaccines didn't exist yet, I would suggest that what you are labelling "Democrat vaccine scepticism" was actually "Democrat scepticism of Trump."Right there you are guilty of politicizing public health discussion.
Perhaps you have forgotten, that in the first year of the pandemic and when the vaccine trials where in phases 1 and 2 and completion of phase 3 of the trials, it was Democrats that made up the majority of vaccine skeptics and Republicans who authorized Operation Warp Speed to bring vaccines into production at record speed.
DO NOT POLITICIZE the debate on vaccines.
I agree that Democrat vaccine skepticism was driven by a distrust and dislike of Trump......Vaccines didn't exist yet, I would suggest that what you are labelling "Democrat vaccine scepticism" was actually "Democrat scepticism of Trump."
The fact is, this vaccine scepticism is very much driven by right-wing media. The same people hate Fauci and hate-hate-HATE Biden and will only say/post things they hear/read from these same sources. It's the current state of play. I'll stop when the problem subsides.
....
One of the worst impacts of the Covid pandemic is that the political rhetoric from both sides of the aisle, left and right, has driven some of our finest and smartest public servants to quit their jobs.
The fact is that unless we acknowledge that our biggest failing in the USA during the pandemic was a polarized media.....both left and right wing....then we are destined to fail again.
Individually we cannot change the world....but individually we (you) can acknowledge that you are a small part of the problem. Every time that you politicize a debate/discussion/argument about vaccines, you magnify the problem. If we could discuss our views without enabling the political activists......then our left wing and right wing media would becomes less profitable and do less damage.
Rant over.
Still a total dickwad. Your reply is typical of dumbarse sheep who can't handle your beliefs being questioned.No, it's pretty clear that you're a pinhead.
Literally the first sentence in your cite: "Cases of myocarditis... following a third dose of Pfizer vaccine are rare and typically mild."
You clearly don't understand fairly basic numbers, as the statisitics in both these mass-media (as opposed to professional journals) are dumbed down for public consumption, and all you seem to grasp is the alarmist tone of some of it.
Still a total dickwad. Your reply is typical of dumbarse sheep who can't handle your beliefs being questioned.
But you are generalising across the entire population. It is accepted that in younger cohorts the risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis and pericarditis is greater and more serious than that occurring through natural infection.They are also aware that there is a higher incidence of myocarditis from people who catch covid. Simply put, you have a higher risk of suffering myocarditis if you actually catch covid than if you have the vaccine.
thanks for an educated response compared with that of steaming pile of shit...Yes, I have read and been aware of the research on myocarditis associated with the covid vaccines. So have all the medical professionals associated with administering the vaccines. This is why, from the very first round of vaccines , prior to boosters, you were asked to wait at the vaccine facility for 30-45 minutes after your vaccine, and why you are asked at your booster shot if you have had certain symptoms.
They are also aware that there is a higher incidence of myocarditis from people who catch covid. Simply put, you have a higher risk of suffering myocarditis if you actually catch covid than if you have the vaccine.
The risk is apparently lower from the booster shot than from the original dosage.
The analysis is incomplete because the data relies on such small samples because the incidence is so small.
The myocarditis symptoms although rare, have also been mild. However you are correct there is an inverse relationship to age and good physicians are advising parents of young male teens so that they can make an informed choice.
However, I have noticed that many people prefer to spend more on a meal out than the co-pay to consult their doctor.
I was only countering your steaming pile of shit, because your sheep reply deservered nothing better.Ah, good response with countering facts.
So, not actually reading and comprehending your own cite leaves you bitter but unwilling to actually change your opinion?
The politicization of public science and medical policy is wrong when -any- politician does it. In my lifetime, the Republicans have been far worse at this
That is complete conspiracy theory nonsense. Since you didnt get it from working at the Fed. You got it from left wing conspiracy theorists , who in my view are often indistinguishable from right wing conspiracy theorists. I really don't care who is worse, or who has more conspiracy theories . In my book, it is just plain divisive and I don't care for either side.... from Allen Greenspan using the Fed to bring on "a mild recession" to help Bush/Cheney's chances in the 200 election,
And yet, you dont get Labor party voters intimating that the Bank of England conspired to win the election for the Tories.....or the CDP voters in Japan suggesting that the PDMA (Japan's equivalent of the FDA) are lackeys of the LDP (governing conservative party)Agree some here, one area I again disagree strongly is that we have no "left wing media" in the USA. We have lots of right-wing media, some genuine professional journalism, and some media that occasionally presents some political views that are almost approaching what would the political center in the rest of the world, and is considered wildly flaming pinko leftist here.
The reality is that the left wing and the right wing in America are nastier and less objective than any other of the major western civilized democracies.There is no winning this battle. There is only driving the racist fascist assholes back under their rocks.
It is a terrible think to say about the state of our nation, when all we can say is "The other side is worse than us"
Instead, how about leading by example. ...
...
FWIW, Greenspan was appointed by Bill Clinton, twice! ...
...
The reality is that the left wing and the right wing in America are nastier and less objective than any other of the major western civilized democracies.