Chief Stipe
Anarchist
- 520
- 90
According to your theory you would approve as you assess them as whacko's and RWNJ's.When people die because of whacko medical theories, that's not "dissent."
According to your theory you would approve as you assess them as whacko's and RWNJ's.When people die because of whacko medical theories, that's not "dissent."
By far. He fell for or was ordered to mislead us re masks because they'd be needed by care providers. He did a bad bad thing. Gotta think his time in job mattered with retirement imminent. It was still not OK. We all want to think we'd stand up to that kind of pressure but until you fuck around and find out ... Ya just don't know.Does Anthony Fauci have a better record?
Does Anthony Fauci have a better record?
You have literally run out of things to do in your life if you can make time for that.If anyone wants an overview of what happened and why back then, just listen to Woodward's interview recordings with then-president Trump. He interviews him every few weeks and you get to hear from the horses mouth what his approach to Covid was.
About your level of science understanding. I must admit you get full marks for doggedly standing firm on your dogma in face of increasingly overwhelming evidence that contradicts you.Depends on what kind of music you like. IIRC Fauci's record collection is mostly jazz and classical
40 minute commute/Audible on 1.2…easy!You have literally run out of things to do in your life if you can make time for that.
What about your ethics? Funded by Pharmaceutical companies perchance?That is quite a grading system you have there.
Explains a lot.
The opinion piece is biased as hell and references a lot of scientific articles. I'll read at least the first several. I can speak to his mention of Gundry (an internet diet salesman with a silly shtick as well as Physician) because I've paid attention to that since it first came up. It was a poster presentation, had a hyperbolic title, got red-flagged then roundly criticized due to inaccuracies and other significant difficiencies, then got re-titled, cleaned up, and toned down. The top-line health-related criticism was that many/most vaccines cause the sort of responses he saw in his patients.Does anyone feel competent to assess https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-heart-damage-and-the-warnings-brushed-aside/ ?
I know the author was appointed a "medical and science correspondent" without the burden of first acquiring any relevant degree and that his career as such was not without controversy or criticism. I also realise that "The Conservative Woman" does not necessarily apply rigorous editorial scrutiny. Since I am already aware of those warning bells, ideally, can we keep comments related to the papers he discusses please?
Does anyone feel competent to assess https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-heart-damage-and-the-warnings-brushed-aside/ ?
I know the author was appointed a "medical and science correspondent" without the burden of first acquiring any relevant degree and that his career as such was not without controversy or criticism. I also realise that "The Conservative Woman" does not necessarily apply rigorous editorial scrutiny. Since I am already aware of those warning bells, ideally, can we keep comments related to the papers he discusses please?
What about my ethics? I suspect they were inherited from my parents.What about your ethics? Funded by Pharmaceutical companies perchance?
You mean Freedumb Fighters ON media platforms continue to spread lies and warp facts to their beliefs.and that social media/the internet spreads unwarranted fear on-topic
I personally suffered from autoimmune myocarditis from a bout of the regular old flu when I was 19. Lifetime effects. Sucks really. Had another bout, from some unknown virus trigger, a couple years ago, right in the middle of the first covid spike. Wasn't covid, some other virus. Takes a bit longer to heal when you are in your mid-50s.Does anyone feel competent to assess https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-heart-damage-and-the-warnings-brushed-aside/ ?
I know the author was appointed a "medical and science correspondent" without the burden of first acquiring any relevant degree and that his career as such was not without controversy or criticism. I also realise that "The Conservative Woman" does not necessarily apply rigorous editorial scrutiny. Since I am already aware of those warning bells, ideally, can we keep comments related to the papers he discusses please?