Transgender Day of Remembrance

[Sol Rosenberg]

No worries. But you really should rethink using derogatory terms like "tranny".

I’ll give it some thought after you stop repeating bullshit narratives about marginalized groups that keep getting attacked and killed by people who believe the bullshit.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I’ll give it some thought after you stop repeating bullshit narratives about marginalized groups that keep getting attacked and killed by people who believe the bullshit.

Like the proposition that men cannot get pregnant?

 

[Voyageur]

Like the proposition that real men can be republicans.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Like the proposition that men cannot get pregnant?

Yes, fill your boots…amplify it until it becomes the great problem of our times. Drive that wedge and enrage the slope pated into a frenzy against the pedo democRAT menace. Just don’t get offended when the predictable results happen and I point out your role in it.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from responsibility for it.

 

[Dog 2.0]

Yes, fill your boots…amplify it until it becomes the great problem of our times. Drive that wedge and enrage the slope pated into a frenzy against the pedo democRAT menace. Just don’t get offended when the predictable results happen and I point out your role in it.

Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from responsibility for it.

Yes! ... Saying "men cannot get pregnant" has now become inciting mass murder. Are you fucking for real?

 

[Voyageur]

Yes! ... Saying "men cannot get pregnant" has now become inciting mass murder. Are you fucking for real?

don't you believe in miracles? the mother of jesus was a virgin, so probably a lesbian.

 

[Steam Flyer]

Yes! ... Saying "men cannot get pregnant" has now become inciting mass murder. Are you fucking for real?

Are you under the impression that repeating insulting lies is actually helping people grow in tolerance and respect for those who are different from themselves?

 

[Marty Gingras]

I think I must’ve finally figured it out, @Dog 2.0 is a somewhat inarticulate (and hypocritical) proponent of counter speech ala Brandeis.

“If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”

Is that what you are getting on about @Dog 2.0?

 

[Dog 2.0]

Are you under the impression that repeating insulting lies is actually helping people grow in tolerance and respect for those who are different from themselves?

Dude...saying "men cannot get pregnant" is neither insulting or a lie.

 

[Dog 2.0]

I think I must’ve finally figured it out, @Dog 2.0 is a somewhat inarticulate (and hypocritical) proponent of counter speech ala Brandeis.

“If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”

Is that what you are getting on about @Dog 2.0?

By now it should be clear to everyone with a brain that the stochastic terrorism charge is simply a thinly veiled attempt to stifle free speech.

 

[Marty Gingras]

By now it should be clear to everyone with a brain that the stochastic terrorism charge is simply a thinly veiled attempt to stifle free speech.

Both can be true and one can be worse than the other.

 

[Steam Flyer]

By now it should be clear to everyone with a brain that the stochastic terrorism charge is simply a thinly veiled attempt to stifle free speech.

"Free Speech" in the sense of shouting FIRE! in a crowded theater.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Yes! ... Saying "men cannot get pregnant" has now become inciting mass murder. Are you fucking for real?

That’s the way. Walk the discussion up the tree of abstraction and out on a limb, like a good bullshitter. But one limb isn’t the whole tree any more than it is a place to hide from your roll in perpetuating the bullshit message, not when you’ve pissed off of so many different branches.

 

[Grrr...]

And for the broader context...

“In unison, these media outlets decreed that not only would greater free speech on Twitter usher in the usual parade of horribles they trot out when demanding censorship — disinformation, hate speech, attacks on the “marginalized,” etc. etc. — but this time they severely escalated their rhetorical hysteria by claiming that Musk would literally cause mass murder by permitting a broader range of political opinion to be aired”...

“But the self-evident absurdity of this laughable meltdown and the ease of mocking it should not obscure that there are lurking within these episodes some genuinely insidious and serious dangers”. Glen Greenwald

Good read.

The Media's Deranged Hysteria Over Elon Musk's Promised Restoration of Free Speech

It was easy to predict that there would be an all-out war from Western power centers if Musk sought to mildly reduce censorship on Twitter. Still, the media outdid itself.

systemupdate.substack.com

First things first. Your source is substack. That is not a valid source, for many reasons. We will clarify proof of that in a minute.

Your link is actually quoting an Axious article that is well researched.

Activists warn lives at risk over Elon Musk's amnesty plans for suspended Twitter accounts

"You will have blood on your hands @elonmusk," said award-winning journalist Hopewell Chin'ono.

www.axios.com

The quote regarding murders is made by a Zimbabwe journalist who points out that the suspended accounts were ghost accounts the government was using to threaten and indirectly kill journalists.

There is no talk of mass murder. The axios article is very specific in who musk is going to hurt. The substack trash is something no reputable outlet would post because of its ridiculous hyperbole and borderline dishonesty.

Would you like to clarify and correct your statement?

 

[veni vidi vici]

What is the percentage of LBGTQ et al did not look like they belonged in a carnival freak show and ran their mouths like a midway dunk tank barker they would socially fit in.
Kinda like Bruce Gender

 

[Marty Gingras]

What is the percentage of LBGTQ et al did not look like they belonged in a carnival freak show and ran their mouths like a midway dunk tank barker they would socially fit in.
Kinda like Bruce Gender

Why do you care?

 

[Voyageur]

 

[Voyageur]

What is the percentage of LBGTQ et al did not look like they belonged in a carnival freak show and ran their mouths like a midway dunk tank barker they would socially fit in.
Kinda like Bruce Gender

maybe you are starting to get the feeling, it is you, who does not fit in. if so, just go with the flow.

 

[Grrr...]

What is the percentage of LBGTQ et al did not look like they belonged in a carnival freak show and ran their mouths like a midway dunk tank barker they would socially fit in.
Kinda like Bruce Gender

This appears to be a veiled suggestion that anyone who looks differently or talks differently doesn't "fit in" and that somehow justifies bigotry.

Oddly enough, this same type of statement has long been used as a veiled racist weapon used to denegrate black people, Indian people, Chinese people, Italians, the Irish.... .

Would you like to alter your statement or do you stand by it?

 

[Dog 2.0]

That’s the way. Walk the discussion up the tree of abstraction and out on a limb, like a good bullshitter. But one limb isn’t the whole tree any more than it is a place to hide from your roll in perpetuating the bullshit message, not when you’ve pissed off of so many different branches.

You said "yes", if you would like to amend it go ahead.