Thanks. I did. Unsurprisingly, I was pretty high on implicit bias. Supposedly even black Americans suffer from implicit bias against black people. It's a history-and-media thing.
You can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you quote the Daily Mail.So you agree with this pair of fuckwits then?
By backing a group that believes boyhood should be 'fluid' and families have become 'gender factories', Prince Harry and Meghan have just joined the war on men plaguing our society. Their woke extremism is dangerous
Given their proclivity to aligning with woke movements, it was probably only a matter of time before Harry and Meghan joined the gender extremists.
But today’s revelation that the Sussexes are throwing their weight behind an organisation who describe the very concept of boyhood as ‘fluid’ and ‘socially constructed’ in an out and out attack on ordinary families is terrifying nonetheless.
As the couple’s true agenda is gradually revealed, it’s becoming obvious that destroying the British Royal Family is only the start of their ambition of a hard left Californian revolution of western society.
A big part of that agenda is erasing so-called toxic masculinity, which is slowly morphing into a general war on men and boys plaguing our society.
So far so woke.
However, it is only when you pull the bonnet up on the organisation that you discover just how radical their aims are.
The activist organisation, which is, somewhat worryingly, already working in UK schools via a curriculum pilot, asks primary school kids to question what they describe as ‘gender norms’ which are ‘not tied to sex organs’.
While it is becoming clear that Harry has been emasculated, most likely out of choice, throughout the course of his relationship with Ms Markle, that doesn’t mean hapless schoolboys should do the same.
DAN WOOTTON: As the couple's true agenda is gradually revealed, it's becoming obvious that destroying the British Royal Family is only the start of their ambition of a hard left revolution.www.dailymail.co.uk
Why would anyone know that a coworker was gay and why would they be fired for being gay?The right to not be fired for being gay at a company with fewer than 15 employees.
Well shouldn’t that be up to each state, same sex “ marriage “ is kind of a new thing and certainly not a Right.The right to have their legal marriage recognized in every state
You are a little slow. I don't expect anyone to take me seriously. But if you have a boner for Megan I understand. We all enjoyed watching her getting porked up againt the wall in the Pearson Specter Litt law library.You can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you quote the Daily Mail.
The right to not be fired for being gay at a company with fewer than 15 employees.
Why would anyone know that a coworker was gay and why would they be fired for being gay?
Perhaps they were not a productive employee of had workplace performance issues?
Fitting into any workplace is a two way relationship with most of the burden on the employee.
The right to have their legal marriage recognized in every state
Look at the fancy dance moves on V3!Well shouldn’t that be up to each state, same sex “ marriage “ is kind of a new thing and certainly not a Right.
Hell even traditional man and woman relationships don’t feel the need for official marriage.
Well shouldn’t that be up to each state...
Gun laws too ?Dear dumbass, no it should not. The Constitution requires each state to recognize the laws of every other state. For example, a couple that marries in one state is not unmarried by moving to another.
One of many things you do not know that you should, as opposed to all the dumb RWNJ bullshit that you think you know but is not true.