Transgender Day of Remembrance

[veni vidi vici]

That truly is a nice sentiment.

A way of life
If not for progressives getting in the way

 

[Voyageur]

has anyonr tried this?
it's a Harvard study. try and fool the test. it is sort of tricky to trick.

Race IAT

implicit.harvard.edu

 

[Marty Gingras]

has anyonr tried this?
it's a Harvard study. try and fool the test. it is sort of tricky to trick.

Race IAT

implicit.harvard.edu

Thanks. I did. Unsurprisingly, I was pretty high on implicit bias. Supposedly even black Americans suffer from implicit bias against black people. It's a history-and-media thing.

 

[veni vidi vici]

Thanks. I did. Unsurprisingly, I was pretty high on implicit bias. Supposedly even black Americans suffer from implicit bias against black people. It's a history-and-media thing.

Universal human DNA

 

[Voyageur]

Thanks. I did. Unsurprisingly, I was pretty high on implicit bias. Supposedly even black Americans suffer from implicit bias against black people. It's a history-and-media thing.

if you try it a few times, you can make it go many ways.

 

[3to1]

if you try it a few times, you can make it go many ways.

exactly.

 

[Liquid]

Tis’ best to just live your own life in an exemplary manner rather than demanding others to behave in ways you see fit

Live and let live!!

So, you're OK with LGBTQ rights then?


Was that so hard?

 

[veni vidi vici]

Live and let live!!

So, you're OK with LGBTQ rights then?


Was that so hard?

They don’t need any “special rights “ in my world
Understand the difference?

 

[Liquid]

They don’t need any “special rights “ in my world
Understand the difference?

Correct, they just need equal rights.

 

[veni vidi vici]

Correct, they just need equal rights.

They already have equal rights!
What Rights do they not have?

 

[another 505 sailor]

They already have equal rights!
What Rights do they not have?

The right to not be fired for being gay at a company with fewer than 15 employees.

 

[beercanned]

So you agree with this pair of fuckwits then?

By backing a group that believes boyhood should be 'fluid' and families have become 'gender factories', Prince Harry and Meghan have just joined the war on men plaguing our society. Their woke extremism is dangerous​

Given their proclivity to aligning with woke movements, it was probably only a matter of time before Harry and Meghan joined the gender extremists.

But today’s revelation that the Sussexes are throwing their weight behind an organisation who describe the very concept of boyhood as ‘fluid’ and ‘socially constructed’ in an out and out attack on ordinary families is terrifying nonetheless.

As the couple’s true agenda is gradually revealed, it’s becoming obvious that destroying the British Royal Family is only the start of their ambition of a hard left Californian revolution of western society.

A big part of that agenda is erasing so-called toxic masculinity, which is slowly morphing into a general war on men and boys plaguing our society.

So far so woke.

However, it is only when you pull the bonnet up on the organisation that you discover just how radical their aims are.

The activist organisation, which is, somewhat worryingly, already working in UK schools via a curriculum pilot, asks primary school kids to question what they describe as ‘gender norms’ which are ‘not tied to sex organs’.

While it is becoming clear that Harry has been emasculated, most likely out of choice, throughout the course of his relationship with Ms Markle, that doesn’t mean hapless schoolboys should do the same.

DAN WOOTTON: Harry and Meghan joined the war on men plaguing society

DAN WOOTTON: As the couple's true agenda is gradually revealed, it's becoming obvious that destroying the British Royal Family is only the start of their ambition of a hard left revolution.

www.dailymail.co.uk

You can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you quote the Daily Mail.

 

[veni vidi vici]

The right to not be fired for being gay at a company with fewer than 15 employees.

Why would anyone know that a coworker was gay and why would they be fired for being gay?
Perhaps they were not a productive employee of had workplace performance issues?
Fitting into any workplace is a two way relationship with most of the burden on the employee.

 

[Expat Canuck]

They already have equal rights!
What Rights do they not have?

The right to have their legal marriage recognized in every state

 

[veni vidi vici]

The right to have their legal marriage recognized in every state

Well shouldn’t that be up to each state, same sex “ marriage “ is kind of a new thing and certainly not a Right.
Hell even traditional man and woman relationships don’t feel the need for official marriage.

 

[Ishmael]

 

[LB 15]

You can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you quote the Daily Mail.

You are a little slow. I don't expect anyone to take me seriously. But if you have a boner for Megan I understand. We all enjoyed watching her getting porked up againt the wall in the Pearson Specter Litt law library.

 

[Marty Gingras]

They already have equal rights!
What Rights do they not have?

The right to not be fired for being gay at a company with fewer than 15 employees.

Why would anyone know that a coworker was gay and why would they be fired for being gay?
Perhaps they were not a productive employee of had workplace performance issues?
Fitting into any workplace is a two way relationship with most of the burden on the employee.

The right to have their legal marriage recognized in every state

Well shouldn’t that be up to each state, same sex “ marriage “ is kind of a new thing and certainly not a Right.
Hell even traditional man and woman relationships don’t feel the need for official marriage.

Look at the fancy dance moves on V3!

 

[Steam Flyer]

Well shouldn’t that be up to each state...

Dear dumbass, no it should not. The Constitution requires each state to recognize the laws of every other state. For example, a couple that marries in one state is not unmarried by moving to another.

One of many things you do not know that you should, as opposed to all the dumb RWNJ bullshit that you think you know but is not true.

 

[veni vidi vici]

Dear dumbass, no it should not. The Constitution requires each state to recognize the laws of every other state. For example, a couple that marries in one state is not unmarried by moving to another.

One of many things you do not know that you should, as opposed to all the dumb RWNJ bullshit that you think you know but is not true.

Gun laws too ?
Automobile radar detectors?
Speed limits?


Gibberish mix and match gibberish