Trimaran “Buddy” abandoned north of Bermuda

unShirley

Super Anarchist
1,912
502
Ventura
The amount of flotsam, jetsam, and solid pollutants floating in the oceans these days seem to have shifted the odds of hitting something during a passage from unlikely to highly likely. These stories are becoming common place. My only experience with passages were a few I did back in the 80s. I don't recall seeing or hitting anything on those. Now....it seems to have become something to expect.
 

AClass USA 230

Anarchist
971
82
Louisiana
The amount of flotsam, jetsam, and solid pollutants floating in the oceans these days seem to have shifted the odds of hitting something during a passage from unlikely to highly likely. These stories are becoming common place. My only experience with passages were a few I did back in the 80s. I don't recall seeing or hitting anything on those. Now....it seems to have become something to expect.

I'd agree that for the bluewater sailor or even coastal cruiser that the risk in today's world is higher of a collision with a floating object but I don't think we've reached a point where it is "highly likely". There are some excellent bluewater podcasts that discuss this in more detail with people doing bluewater passage sailing. While they acknowledge the same, it seems they all agree the risk is still relatively low for such an incident. You can also substantially reduce your risk if you can plan your routing to avoid the shipping lanes.

I'm not an experienced offshore sailor but I recently did a two day crossing of the Gulf of Mexico from Tampa Bay to Gulfport, MS (425 nautical miles across open water) and we did not see any floating debris at all during the entire trip.

In the case of Buddy, it does appear to have been pretty shitty "bad luck".
 

Zonker

Super Anarchist
11,572
8,404
Canada
One RTW:
- one log, damaged port daggerbard/bow
- one whale, bent starboard rudder
- other minor collisions/minor debris that caused no damage

We saw LOTS of floating junk over the years. Certainly some was big enough to ruin your day.
 
We may find out one day. I suspect it's still floating. When he owned her, John Patterson breached the center chamber of Buddy while sailing in the Caribbean. Something hard floating low enough to only effect that chamber. The boat floated with the fore and aft chambers in tact, and he was able to sail to port safely, the ama about half sunken. So clearly we had a different type of impact. The tracker was not waterproof. We were using a Predict Wind tracker app, broadcast through an iridium Go mounted quite high at the nav station. I had it plugged into the 12V system so it would continue broadcasting, but if the boat capsized, it would be under water with an open USB port. We brought the epirb with us for obvios reasons.
Just some thoughts here:'
We may never know. But what WESS said is fairly spot on. I too am concerned because we sail our trimaran thousands of miles offshore.
Your account of a previous ama collision that filled the center section... same ama?
During that collision she continued sailing and when our ama filled we experienced a similar situation with respect to being able to continue on.
From her interior pictures... it appears that Buddy was all wood core in main hull, but is it known how amas were constructed?
Was the foam floatation>> 'poured in place or loose foam blocks...what type of 'foam'... all this matters greatly. From my limited experience of owning one all-wood and one partially cedar cored trimaran>>> Sealed compartments and wood construction are not kind to each other with a 20 year old hull.
 
Last edited:

SPatton

Member
306
26
Why was Buddy listing at 45 degrees to port?

It seems to me that, once the port ama lost buoyancy by being filled with water, it would sit just below the surface. Seems like there would need to be another force to cause it to keep submerging.

Also, it seems to me like the port ama would act as a sea anchor, so the rest of the boat would be downwind of it, which would help the situation--the wind on the mast would help right the boat.

Note that I'm well-trained in the liberal arts (not anything useful in these sorts of discussions), so I could be entirely full of it here. I just saw this idea raised on the F-boat listserv and I didn't see it discussed here so I thought I'd let you guys tell me how dumb I am.
 

Raz'r

Super Anarchist
64,856
6,923
De Nile
Why was Buddy listing at 45 degrees to port?

It seems to me that, once the port ama lost buoyancy by being filled with water, it would sit just below the surface. Seems like there would need to be another force to cause it to keep submerging.

Also, it seems to me like the port ama would act as a sea anchor, so the rest of the boat would be downwind of it, which would help the situation--the wind on the mast would help right the boat.

Note that I'm well-trained in the liberal arts (not anything useful in these sorts of discussions), so I could be entirely full of it here. I just saw this idea raised on the F-boat listserv and I didn't see it discussed here so I thought I'd let you guys tell me how dumb I am.
Gravity acting on the mast would be plenty of force to push the damaged side under, assuming most of that flotation failed for some reason.
 

kruiter

Member
74
48
Honlulu
Congratulations on getting everyone to safety! From time to time I think about this possibility and consider putting air bags in my amas. Maybe waterbed mattresses filled with air?
 

CapDave

Anarchist
One RTW:
- one log, damaged port daggerbard/bow
- one whale, bent starboard rudder
- other minor collisions/minor debris that caused no damage

We saw LOTS of floating junk over the years. Certainly some was big enough to ruin your day.
Sailing from Grenada to Sint Maarten last month at 12 knots with the port dagger down we hit something at the proverbial 2.30am, three loud bangs. It didn't slow the boat at all, and we had no water ingress. Dagger came up and down ok, rudders worked, saildrives worked, no new vibrations.

We went straight into the lagoon in SXM and weren't brave enough to go in and look at it. Came out a few days ago and looked, yikes! Port keel shows impact at bottom of leading edge, with about a 6" crack on the inboard face, laminates cleanly broken. Starboard keel has a big divot halfway down the leading edge, about two hands to cover it, maybe 3" deep with full laminate destruction and foam core showing. So the keels did their job and protected the functional stuff. There is no evidence of motion, they're still firmly stuck to the hulls. Being non-structural, looks like an easy repair.

Glad we don't have a whale-bottom boat, that would have been a saildrive and maybe rudder too on starboard.
 

slug zitski

Super Anarchist
7,982
1,877
worldwide
Sailing from Grenada to Sint Maarten last month at 12 knots with the port dagger down we hit something at the proverbial 2.30am, three loud bangs. It didn't slow the boat at all, and we had no water ingress. Dagger came up and down ok, rudders worked, saildrives worked, no new vibrations.

We went straight into the lagoon in SXM and weren't brave enough to go in and look at it. Came out a few days ago and looked, yikes! Port keel shows impact at bottom of leading edge, with about a 6" crack on the inboard face, laminates cleanly broken. Starboard keel has a big divot halfway down the leading edge, about two hands to cover it, maybe 3" deep with full laminate destruction and foam core showing. So the keels did their job and protected the functional stuff. There is no evidence of motion, they're still firmly stuck to the hulls. Being non-structural, looks like an easy repair.

Glad we don't have a whale-bottom boat, that would have been a saildrive and maybe rudder too on starboard.
Ocean sunfish , whales, ship junk, logs …many things to hit

one year i tangled with a floating 50 meter long , polypropylene ships hawser ..with barnacles that monster was a foot in diameter

check out the floating pig…. Well offshore

0183EA83-A154-45E1-8862-D8EBB6BE88A2.jpeg
 

jmh2002

Anarchist
976
799
...Came out a few days ago and looked, yikes! Port keel shows impact at bottom of leading edge, with about a 6" crack on the inboard face, laminates cleanly broken. Starboard keel has a big divot halfway down the leading edge, about two hands to cover it, maybe 3" deep with full laminate destruction and foam core showing. So the keels did their job...

On the plus side, as you alluded to, it could have been much worse.

The combination of a performance boat, waterline length, but then letting go of a little bit of of the 'ultmate (maybe theoretical in a cruising context?) performance' by having fixed keels seems like a worthwhile trade off for a long distance live aboard cruising cat.

At some point, with a big enough performance orientated boat, it already becomes fast enough for cruising anyway.

(y)
 

Zonker

Super Anarchist
11,572
8,404
Canada
Our daggerboard damage & repair sequence. Barely an inconvenience

1670999883828.png


Jigsaw

1670999910049.png


Glue in some corecell and let cure

1670999936292.png


Shape foam and sand surrounding area. Make the foam leading edge a bit deeper to allow for glass builduip

1670999986121.png


Not shown - Glass a few layers of biax over the repair, fairing compound, antifoul.

A few hours work over 3 days. The green stuff is Jotun's equivalent to Awlfair. Lovely stuff as well.
 

harryproa

Anarchist
942
182
Another pov from Richard Spindler:
"Profligate slammed to an abrupt halt from about five knots when the starboard daggerboard crunched into one of the big rocks that are scattered around the otherwise sand bottom.
While Profligate came to a complete stop, the 11 crewmembers didn't. Some were tossed into bulkheads or knocked off their feet.
But Dona, who had been leaning on the seagull striker, suffered the most. When Profligate stopped, she kept right on going. Right off the front of the boat.
When Dona was in the water, she was surrounded by bits of foam and fiberglass, the source of which could only be the bottom of Profligate's starboard daggerboard, which is now firmly imbedded into the crash box. It's likely going to need a haul-out to get that daggerboard out, although we'll try other methods."

The forces involved go up as the square of the speed, so 20 knots(4 x the 5 knots in the report) results in 16x the force.

Daggerboards (and rudders, and auxillary drive systems) that can be impacted by fixed or floating solid objects have no place on a high speed cruising multi.
 
Last edited:



Latest posts

SA Podcast

Sailing Anarchy Podcast with Scot Tempesta

Sponsored By:

Top