Tucker Carlson says it is immoral to criticize White Supremacists.

[badlatitude]

In a clip you truly must see to believe, anti-LGBTQ+ Fox News troll Tucker Carlson slammed members of the media who denigrate people due to their race and ethnicity.

On a recent episode of Tucker Carlson Tonight, Carlson claimed MSNBC is “openly advocating race hate” toward white people and compared the channel’s commentary on white supremacy to the horrific Rwandan Genocide.

After playing clips of MSNBC correspondents and guests talking about white supremacy, Carlson declared – without a hint of irony – “you can’t attack people, whole groups of people, on the basis of their race and ethnicity. Not in the media, especially, because of its reach. That’s completely irresponsible and immoral and ultimately can have very bad effects.”

He then compared 1993 radio broadcasts from a Rwandan ethnic group called the Hutus that were demonizing another group called the Tutsis. These broadcasts were in part what led to the 1994 genocide of hundreds of thousands of Tutsis by both the army and Hutu militia groups. Carlson said the Hutus were targeting the Tutsis due to their ethnicity, “just like MSNBC,” implying that MSNBC’s broadcasts would lead to some sort of white genocide.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...l-to-criticize-white-supremacists/ar-AA172pnP

 

[Bus Driver]

Trying to incite a race war.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

 

[Ishmael]

Trying incite a race war.

I look forward to his demise.

 

[Sol Rosenberg]

Fuck Tucker Carlson. It is one of life’s great ironies that it always seems to be the lowest white pieces of shit espousing supremacy bullshit, never one of the decent, intelligent, thoughtful people.

 

[beercanned]

Tucker Carlson is a provocateur. No more and no less.

It's a sign of his talent that he can rile up both his fans and his enemies with the same words.

He's not going anywhere. That he can drive clicks and views from both supporters and detractors makes him exceptionally valuable to his employers.

If you want him to lose influence, just don't give him your attention.

 

[3to1]

Tucker Carlson is a provocateur. No more and no less.

It's a sign of his talent that he can rile up both his fans and his enemies with the same words.

He's not going anywhere. That he can drive clicks and views from both supporters and detractors makes him exceptionally valuable to his employers.

If you want him to lose influence, just don't give him your attention.

is it ok to drag his ass into a dark alley and beat some sense into him?

 

[Voyageur]

i thought yesterday was punch a nazi day. somebody didn't see a shadow. send it antifa.

 

[Olsonist]

That might be mistaken for Punch A Fiscal Conservative Who Wouldn't Have Voted For Trump Were It Not That Democrats Nominated Hillary Who Was Worse Day. it's very hard to tell these days apart.

 

[Bus Driver]

That might be mistaken for Punch A Fiscal Conservative Who Wouldn't Have Voted For Trump Were It Not That Democrats Nominated Hillary Who Was Worse Day. it's very hard to tell these days apart.

Are there REALY any "fiscal conservatives" around, anymore?

Looks more like "social conservatives", other wise known as Regressives, who only pretend to care about fiscal responsibility.

 

[Happy]

By white supremacist-type logic, Tucker Carlson is proof that all whites are stupid jerks who'll do anything for some attention and big bucks.

Scientifically, he would be an example of retrograde evolution. A TV creature in a suit who is slowly devolving into an angry monkey.

Those who actually follow him and believe him are in another class altogether......

 

[Goodvibes]

Fuck Tucker Carlson. It is one of life’s great ironies that it always seems to be the lowest white pieces of shit espousing supremacy bullshit, never one of the decent, intelligent, thoughtful people.

But it's not really 'him' is it.

He is just a tool that you are expected to blame.

 

[Olsonist]

Are there REALY any "fiscal conservatives" around, anymore?

Looks more like "social conservatives", other wise known as Regressives, who only pretend to care about fiscal responsibility.

There never were. The term comes from the 30s as a Republican criticism of FDR. The term goes out of fashion when Republicans control the purse strings and then suddenly reappears when Democrats do. It's a pose, a troll. It's not a principle Republicans apply to themselves.

 

[billsreef]

is it ok to drag his ass into a dark alley and beat some sense into him?

Only one problem with that. I don't think it's possible get any sense into him.

 

[3to1]

Only one problem with that. I don't think it's possible get any sense into him.

maybe not, but ya gotta' at least try, right?

 

[justsomeguy!]

I'm sorry, but who the fuck cares what he says?

 

[billsreef]

maybe not, but ya gotta' at least try, right?

I think it will be like fixing a computer with a hammer. You won't actually fix it, but you will feel better afterwards .

 

[Bus Driver]

I'm sorry, but who the fuck cares what he says?

With folks "Truthing" they are ready to take up arms to fight for the defeated ex-President, who then "re-Truths" it, the gasoline has been spilled. Tucker is lighting and flicking matches.

 

[Goodvibes]

You are all blaming one guy?

Do you really think they just scrub him up, sit him in front of the camera and say 'Action'?

This is planned to the letter, he is a talking head. Blaming him means that he can be removed at any time as a scape-goat and the people directing are not harmed.

 

[Bus Driver]

I don't think anyone is "blaming one guy".

He does have a significant platform and audience. So, the words he uses can do far more damage than most. He needs to be held to account for what his words will incite.