jerseyguy
Super Anarchist
And a gentleman’s agreement breaks down when you are dealing with thugsIt takes two to make a deal.
And a gentleman’s agreement breaks down when you are dealing with thugsIt takes two to make a deal.
MAGA types would see that as a plus. Fewer DemocratsShould work if you're keen to sacrifice a few US cities on the EC.
Right. So the US has made it public knowledge that the POTUS is always within reach of the "football" (an overt threat) and the UK is the bad guy? Really?
So far as I am aware, prayer is not a military strategy. But perhaps all they have left.
From what I understand from my Russian contacts, they blame England as the primary culprit. I don’t understand it and militate against it. So, for me, they (UK) are the primary target for any exchange.The USA and Russia have and had used overt threats of global thermonuclear war since the end of WWII and now Britain is working to violate their NPT obligations.
Your desire to create moralistic parallels can't erase this reality. There is no reason why the United Kingdom needs to increase their nuclear arsenal while the other signatories reduce their arsenals in compliance with the treaty.
Reminds me of that Eddie Murphy joke where Johnny Carson's wife gets a job to add $150 dollars to Johnny's $150 million. What is the point of the British nuclear arsenal anyway other than yet another accident waiting to happen?
Well? I hate politicians.
And violating the NPT with a half-assed nuclear arsenal is going to be a deterrent against that? The USA already has a few thousand NPT-compliant nukes pointed at Russia and China. What makes Britain sufficiently different from Belgium, Poland and others that they need nukes?From what I understand from my Russian contacts, they blame England as the primary culprit. I don’t understand it and militate against it. So, for me, they (UK) are the primary target for any exchange.
I like where you're going, but unfortunately, that horse left the barn a long time ago.And violating the NPT with a half-assed nuclear arsenal is going to be a deterrent against that? The USA already has a few thousand NPT-compliant nukes pointed at Russia and China. What makes Britain sufficiently different from Belgium, Poland and others that they need nukes?
The goal is to get rid of all the nukes, not kickstart this nutty process afresh.
I like where you're going, but unfortunately, that horse left the barn a long time ago.
Like Putin said, The US set the precedent when we used nukes on Japan, so turnabout is fair play, right?
.