Mark_K
Super Anarchist
What makes that article a fantasy? Did you read it?Only if this militia had anti-tank weapons and artillery. But do carry on with your fantasy, you seem to enjoy it very much.
What makes that article a fantasy? Did you read it?Only if this militia had anti-tank weapons and artillery. But do carry on with your fantasy, you seem to enjoy it very much.
Without regulation they are not a militia, they are something else.Sounds like a well regulated militia could come in handy.
I was referring to Talk-To-Himself Tom's gunfondling fantasies, not your cited article.What makes that article a fantasy? Did you read it?
I see it now. Thought it was a reply to my post, which the notification said it was. Now I see my post was merely imbedded.I was referring to Talk-To-Himself Tom's gunfondling fantasies, not your cited article.
I did read it (just read it again), and it relayed a good bit of information about the pre-invasion actions of Zelenskyy and his gov't. Thanks.
The point is Zelensky ran on a platform of normalizing relations with Russia in the existent condition of Russian occupation of both Crimea and the two break-away republics, which was distinct from the policy of the strident anti-Russian Poroshenko. At that time the majority of Ukrainians were open to accepting the situation as it was, ending the shooting, and moving on.I read the article and I do not think your conclusion is on par with that article. Crimea was not even talked about. And goal was absolutely not Donbas or Crimea in Russian hands.
Quote;
However, the situation in the Donbas remains explosive. Despite the ongoing talks in Minsk and force disengagement on the line of contact, more cease-fire violations were committed in both Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in September than in the previous month. At this point, ending the conflict seems more an aspirational goal than one to be achieved on a timetable.
The point is Zelensky ran on a platform of normalizing relations with Russia in the existent condition of Russian occupation of both Crimea and the two break-away republics, which was distinct from the policy of the strident anti-Russian Poroshenko. At that time the majority of Ukrainians were open to accepting the situation as it was, ending the shooting, and moving on.I read the article and I do not think your conclusion is on par with that article. Crimea was not even talked about. And goal was absolutely not Donbas or Crimea in Russian hands.
Quote;
However, the situation in the Donbas remains explosive. Despite the ongoing talks in Minsk and force disengagement on the line of contact, more cease-fire violations were committed in both Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in September than in the previous month. At this point, ending the conflict seems more an aspirational goal than one to be achieved on a timetable.
The evidence is self-apparent in the policy of seeking normalization in the condition which existed.Maybe Ukraine was ready for peace, but as evident Russia wanted more.
Any source for your claim ? Ending of shooting and moving on, giving Russia all territory they occupied ? Because I never heard that that was a general position popular in Ukraine.
Zelensky is Pres since 2019 and tried to negotiate with Russia, Russia refused. And in 2020/2021 Covid was more in the news.
Ending the undeclared war with Russia was one of Zelenskyy’s promises, and he has tried adopting non-confrontational rhetoric towards Putin and making various concessions, such as holding elections in the occupied Donbas before reclaiming control of the Ukraine-Russian border – an extremely unpopular move in Ukraine.![]()
Ukraine still backs Zelenskyy despite slow progress
Expectations Volodymyr Zelenskyy would end the armed conflict with Russia or jail corrupt officials have faded, but so have fears he would sell out to oligarchs or the Kremlin.www.chathamhouse.org
The Normandy Meeting in Paris in December 2019 bore few results but, by demonstrating his willingness for constructive negotiations, Zelenskyy did succeed in swaying the support of Paris and Berlin towards Kyiv’s interpretation of the Minsk Agreements whereby security comes first and Ukraine’s sovereignty must not be further compromised by Russia and its proxies.
When Russia then rejected any amendments to the protocols..
And any possibility of that policy becoming something concrete went out the window once Russia invaded, didn't it?The evidence is self-apparent in the policy of seeking normalization in the condition which existed.
More than a possibility, "...rendered moot by events" as I previously said.And any possibility of that policy becoming something concrete went out the window once Russia invaded, didn't it?
The Russian people have been effectively neutered by the Kremlin's harsh response to the initial protests against the war.Ukraine's done pretty well with military strategy, and their political work has been top notch.
I hope that, with the west's assistances they are able to attack their real enemy, V Putin.
A good destabilizing push may possibly be the wartime masterstroke they need. Some sort of corruption charge which exposed his armies to needless destruction, lying to wartime moms. Something his country's people find unforgivable and can be taken advantage of by people who currently live in understandable fear of his power.
That, or a lone assassin with access.
I'm not holding out much hope, but Russia ain't Ukraines enemy as much as one aging ex KGB agent.