Ukraine and Only Ukraine. If it isn't about Ukraine then fuck off

[billy backstay]

Happens a lot off the coast of Norfolk . At times there will be a mess of UK and US aircraft playing silly buggers with a company who’s name escapes me

N Zed war games!!

USAF and RNZAF to participate in Exercise Nocturnal Reach

The Royal New Zealand Air Force’s (RNZAF) and the US Air Force (USAF) personnel and aircraft are set to participate in the Exercise Nocturnal Reach.

www.airforce-technology.com

 

[Ex Machina]

well if it’s a dick swinging competition ….

 

[LeoV]

company who’s name escapes me

Draken ?

 

[Ex Machina]

Draken ?

I really can’t remember but they had a few passenger type craft , maybe Pilatus ?

 

[LeoV]

Adversary Air Contract For Nellis Air Force Base Won't Be Renewed

After years of providing Nellis with 'red air' capabilities, Draken International will cease operations at the base in June.

www.thedrive.com

 

[Ease the sheet.]

Aussie f18's being talked about...

Australian F/A-18 Hornet fighters could be transferred to Ukraine

The United States, Australia and Ukraine are discussing sending 41 Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) F/A-18 Hornet fighters to Kiev in response to President Vol

www.aviacionline.com

 

[Dervish]

egyptian shark eats russian draft dodger. brutal!

 

[Burning Man]

If true, it’s about FUCKING TIME!!

No Fly Zone when??

 

[Burning Man]

Very interesting clip from Russian State TV where what appears to be a couple of knowledgeable guests assert that:

1. The dam could not have been destroyed by external explosions (it was designed to withstand a nuclear blast. The one guy said in his opinion that it could only be done by a large amount of placed explosives resulting in a phenomenon he called a "water saw".
2. The dam was fully under Russian control.

In other words, IMO they imply that it could only have been done by the Russians:

Yeah. Large dams are exceedingly hard to destroy with conventional weapons. A few artillery shells are barely going to cause a scratch to the dam. Ask the British “Dam Busters” in WWII how hard it was to breach a dam.

Fucking OF COURSE the Russians blew it. Why is this even up for debate?

 

[Keith]

 

[phill_nz]

Ask the British “Dam Busters” in WWII how hard it was to breach a dam.

i was going to post you should watch the 50s film of the dam busters
barnes wallis ('s actor ) goes into a bit of detail about what is required

dont ask for a time stamp i havnt watched it in decades

 

[Keith]

"made in China"

 

[phill_nz]

we need the usa and nato to take another small step / giant leap

every time the rushtards do a despicable act ( as they seem of a regular want to do ) we up the ante
this time it should be both f16's and atacms
and just for fun a handful of fa18's in both the normal and super skins

 

[phill_nz]

as for china
they are obviously putting the feelers out by supplying in a round about way military stuff to the rushtards

no problem
time to burn the feelers

 

[Keith]

 

[Keith]

 

[Keith]

 

[Keith]

 

[barfy]

Yeah. Large dams are exceedingly hard to destroy with conventional weapons. A few artillery shells are barely going to cause a scratch to the dam. Ask the British “Dam Busters” in WWII how hard it was to breach a dam.

Fucking OF COURSE the Russians blew it. Why is this even up for debate?

Jake Broe with 18 reasons. Most of them pretty solid. There's more of course.

 

[The Dark Knight]

Nice sentiment, but before anything like that is done, a quick refresh of history should be done.

Hint: Treaty of Versailles -> Hitler -> WW2

​