Ukraine

dogwatch

Super Anarchist
17,887
2,178
South Coast, UK
I would have prefered EU including Russia, it could have put the focus on achieving economic parity intead of military one.
Ludicrous. The EU has the values of a rules based system. Russia has never, at any point, had rule of law. It works, from top to bottom,  through personal power and the threat of violence. I had an ex-boss who tried  to integrate a Russian industry into international systems. It turned out he was basically dealing with a state supported organised crime syndicate. You can’t deal with them without becoming like them. If you want to keep your soul, it is best not to try.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
47,972
11,666
Eastern NC
Ludicrous. The EU has the values of a rules based system. Russia has never, at any point, had rule of law. It works, from top to bottom,  through personal power and the threat of violence. I had an ex-boss who tried  to integrate a Russian industry into international systems. It turned out he was basically dealing with a state supported organised crime syndicate. You can’t deal with them without becoming like them. If you want to keep your soul, it is best not to try.
This is correct. I had an uncle who ran a business that expanded into Europe and from there into East Germany and from there into Russia. The Russian part sputtered along, as soon as it started making money the various aparatchiks showed up to claim their cut, just like a Mafia shakedown. He folded it shortly after Putin took over, telling his investors they were lucky to get out of it whole.

- DSK

 

MR.CLEAN

Moderator
they could have been/would have been much better integrated into the European economy if the west, particularly the germans, had not been so shortsighted, and if they had not felt so deeply disrespected by the west
Russia has either been conquered or conquerors for most of a millenium, they don’t do “friends” well, and their world view has fundamental differences to the rest of the western nations. This is very deeply engrained, and I doubt that touchy feely lovey in the 90s would have done much to change things in the long run. Past practice being the best predictor of future action and all. 

 

estarzinger

Super Anarchist
7,774
1,208
Russia has either been conquered or conquerors for most of a millenium, they don’t do “friends” well, and their world view has fundamental differences to the rest of the western nations. This is very deeply engrained, and I doubt that touchy feely lovey in the 90s would have done much to change things in the long run. Past practice being the best predictor of future action and all. 
you could have perhaps said the same about the germans at one point.

The marshall plan approach DID make make a significant difference in how they reacted to failure ww1 vs ww2.

I suspect we will just have to agree to disagree on this.   The fall of the USSR was a cataclysmic and traumatic enough experience that I believe there was a one-time window to make a difference despite/overcoming the history you allude to.  I was told this straight out by people there who could have made a difference.  A window which we did not take and instead let the mob take over.   There were factory managers literally waiting in their offices for western managers to come and show them how it was done (because that is what they would have done if they had won the cold war), and instead we left them to sit alone and the mob grabbed them.

Perhaps it would not have worked, but we don't know and just debate it on the internet because we did not even try.

edit: and btw treating with respect not equal to lovey dovey, you should know that

 
Last edited by a moderator:

dogwatch

Super Anarchist
17,887
2,178
South Coast, UK
This is correct. I had an uncle who ran a business that expanded into Europe and from there into East Germany and from there into Russia. The Russian part sputtered along, as soon as it started making money the various aparatchiks showed up to claim their cut, just like a Mafia shakedown. He folded it shortly after Putin took over, telling his investors they were lucky to get out of it whole.

- DSK
Here is a bit of a chicken-feed story but amusing in its way. I knew a highly educated Russian translator, a very moral person. In the dying days of the USSR, she was minding a group in the bar of the Hotel Cosmos, which at the time was the hotel in Moscow for western visitors. It was full of obvious prostitutes, milling about and discomforting her group. She spotted a couple of uniformed police and headed towards them to ask them to disperse them when she realised the women were actually queueing up, entirely openly, to pay the police their protection money.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

accnick

Super Anarchist
4,042
2,967
Here is a bit of a chicken-feed story but amusing in its way. I knew a highly educated Russian translator, a very moral person. In the dying days of the USSR, she was minding a group in the bar of the Hotel Cosmos, which at the time was the hotel in Moscow for western visitors. It was full of obvious prostitutes, milling about and discomforting her group. She spotted a couple of uniformed police and headed towards them to ask them to disperse them when she realised the women were actually queueing up, entirely openly, to pay the police their protection money.
We spent a few days in a nominally high-end hotel in St. Petersburg during a Volvo Race stopover. A group of us would gather in the lobby for drinks at the end of the workday. The prostitutes would wander through the lobby looking for customers, usually with a minder lurking in the background.

Subtle they were not.

We called them "Svetlanas". Not sure I ever saw one snag a customer, but with all the overseas businessmen there, they probably did OK.

 

Rennmaus

Super Anarchist
10,685
2,278
The problem is this- the devil you know vs the devil you dont. Putin is predictable, what comes after we dont know but Europe has fascism on the rise and as we can see in the US recently, its has legs there too.

The last thing we need is more nutters with the nuclear codes
Putin is predictable? Yeah, right... 

 
I dont agree, US sanctions have made Russia quite resilient over the years (remember the US needs an enemy to placate the voters and keep the MIC happy. Ukraine and Russia supply 24% of the world wheat and very important raw resources such as argon gas etc not to mention the oil and gas. Sure its going to hurt but never underestimate the power of having an enemy to boost your support (Putin). 

Nato is basically all about war and aggression, not defence as the propaganda people have painted it, it is an arm of the US military.

The Ukrainian population are mixed over Russia, now they are anti obviously but that blows with the wind, never forget that the aim of the Western capitalists is open slather on Ukraine's resources, democracy means the legal right to take it all for the 1%ers. As I said the world order is changing, democracy hasn't delivered- MAGA proved it. 
Wrong.

NATO is a defense force only.

NATO has not invaded anyone.

NATO is a group of countries working together. 

Poutines Russia is the aggressor here, nothing more nothing less.

Poutine fears the freedom of a happy and free democracy on his border.

 

idontwan2know

Super Anarchist
3,083
228
Putin is predictable? Yeah, right... 
Actually, I think he has been fairly predictable until recently, you just have to try and put yourself in the mindset of a person who is completely amoral and has two priorities: maintaining personal power and restoring the Russian empire. Within those confines he's been remarkably pragmatic until this Ukraine invasion, which is such a massive blunder that even his own military/intelligence people didn't think he'd ever actually do it.

 

Steam Flyer

Sophisticated Yet Humble
47,972
11,666
Eastern NC
Wrong.

NATO is a defense force only.

NATO has not invaded anyone.

NATO is a group of countries working together. 

Poutines Russia is the aggressor here, nothing more nothing less.

Poutine fears the freedom of a happy and free democracy on his border.
I don't think that Putin fears "freedom," he fears loss of power to a more free and open system competing against his system. When you genuinely believe in the heirarchy of "some people are better than others" then the idea of the people of a border country choosing to reject Russian hegemony and economic dominance is a tremendous insult. In a way, it is also a threat that more and more people will choose this.

So, it is a perfectly logical step to take that choice away from the people, by force if necessary.

The exact same kind of thinking is gaining ground in the US.

Putin is predictable? Yeah, right... 
Actually, I think he has been fairly predictable until recently, you just have to try and put yourself in the mindset of a person who is completely amoral and has two priorities: maintaining personal power and restoring the Russian empire. Within those confines he's been remarkably pragmatic until this Ukraine invasion, which is such a massive blunder that even his own military/intelligence people didn't think he'd ever actually do it.
The problem with depending on The Big Lie as a key part of your wealth/power. Eventually, all Big Liars get caught in the trap of believing their own bullshit.

- DSK

 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,446
1,002
quivira regnum
you could have perhaps said the same about the germans at one point.

The marshall plan approach DID make make a significant difference in how they reacted to failure ww1 vs ww2.

I suspect we will just have to agree to disagree on this.   The fall of the USSR was a cataclysmic and traumatic enough experience that I believe there was a one-time window to make a difference despite/overcoming the history you allude to.  I was told this straight out by people there who could have made a difference.  A window which we did not take and instead let the mob take over.   There were factory managers literally waiting in their offices for western managers to come and show them how it was done (because that is what they would have done if they had won the cold war), and instead we left them to sit alone and the mob grabbed them.

Perhaps it would not have worked, but we don't know and just debate it on the internet because we did not even try.
for sure this view is held by many Russian experts. a window was open. but now it's no more than an intellectual discussion - bombs are falling.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

idontwan2know

Super Anarchist
3,083
228
alright then. I see where you stand. alongside the murdering sociopath.

I'm quite content to take that risk.
Good lord man, calm down.

I am not alongside the murdering sociopath and would be happy if one of his generals put a bullet in the back of his brain.

But this is the real world not the movies ,and you have to consider all possible outcomes.

 

floater

Super Duper Anarchist
5,446
1,002
quivira regnum
interesting - and this sounds alot like the Ukrainian fighters rn: How are the Russians fighting, I ask. "They fight like stupid animals," says Reaper. "They fight like it's 1941 - they have no manoeuvrability, they just come to the front and that's all. They have a lot of people, a lot of tanks, a lot of vehicles, but we are fighting for our land, and we are protecting our families. it doesn't matter how they fight because we fight like lions and they won't win."  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60693166

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kiwing

Super Anarchist
3,969
746
Bay of Islands
Is it blind hope or is there some rational to it? But I think Ukraine will win.  The more they resist the more the world wants to and finds a way to help.  But it is their unimaginable determination which is the convincing factor.  I think even nuclear weapons would not make a difference?  It will be a long and horrible war. 

What will Putin's out be?

 
Top